No one disputes that the FDA has the authority to ban--that is one of their legistated functions. The issue here is do they have jurisdition to ban. The Senate just answered that question clearly now.
SE and njoy argued that e-cigs are a tobacco product and should fall under the jurisdiction of the ATF. Now that the FDA will be gaining control of tobacco products as well, the issue is rendered moot. No matter what you try to call them, they fall under the FDA's jurisdiction. All the FDA has to do is hold a hearing prior and then act.
In the case of SE and njoy---they argue in the alternative, that the FDA never held any hearing before issuing import alerts to have customs seize e-cigs. Was this procedural defect? Yes. Is it fatal to the FDA's stance that they are illegal and banned---not when the FDA argues in the name of saftey.
Example--if the FDA is apprised that there is lead paint in toy ABC--toy ABC can be banned from sale on the spot and no hearings are needed under the guise of saftey.
So is there a ban in effect? According to the very agency that is charged with banning them---the answer is yes subject to challange by judical action. The fact that the FDA enforced the ban on an ad hoc bases really does fly in the face if exogent circumstances to ban in the name of saftey and hearing should have been held, but that is not likey to save the day--------------Sun
SE and njoy argued that e-cigs are a tobacco product and should fall under the jurisdiction of the ATF. Now that the FDA will be gaining control of tobacco products as well, the issue is rendered moot. No matter what you try to call them, they fall under the FDA's jurisdiction. All the FDA has to do is hold a hearing prior and then act.
In the case of SE and njoy---they argue in the alternative, that the FDA never held any hearing before issuing import alerts to have customs seize e-cigs. Was this procedural defect? Yes. Is it fatal to the FDA's stance that they are illegal and banned---not when the FDA argues in the name of saftey.
Example--if the FDA is apprised that there is lead paint in toy ABC--toy ABC can be banned from sale on the spot and no hearings are needed under the guise of saftey.
So is there a ban in effect? According to the very agency that is charged with banning them---the answer is yes subject to challange by judical action. The fact that the FDA enforced the ban on an ad hoc bases really does fly in the face if exogent circumstances to ban in the name of saftey and hearing should have been held, but that is not likey to save the day--------------Sun