You've been here too long. Since when is a "newbie" question dumb? Everyone starts somewhere and some people don't know how to ask questions... they just have something on their mind. No question should ever be addressed as stupid... especially by those supposedly more experienced.
And to answer your question... Yah, I believed his question is just as legit as yours.
So, now you've got links to the reports, just like you asked... you still think the OP was imagining them? You should be apologizing to him... not throwing around more animosity.
Look, I'm not here to argue with you, but geesh... give the guy a break. He's new to all this!
They face many problems with this "test" 32 people is not a large sample and they chose people with asthma and CLPD as the non-smoker part.
32 people is a sample now? and when I try to Google the exact address you linked it doesn't appear, meaning it's not the one he saw. When you get 32 people and a smoker beats a non smoker in a challenge doesn't make the non smokers lungs weaker. There are no scientific evidences that vaping caused them to lose, other then the hypothesis made that is again unproven.
Very weak argument and not the OP's because he said he googled it and no keywords can make it come up because it is that unreputable.
Did you run the race before they vaped? What did the winner win by that time? He likely would have been the same guy by the same time, there were no medical devices or measurements other then we had smokers, asthamtics and CLPD run a race and the smokers won. Wat was scientific about that exactly? What was the X and Y variables?
What was the mean time before they vaped and the mean time after? Did the smokers gain time or the asthmatics lose time? CPLD stay the same? These questions you can't answer but claim it harmed everyone.
Care to try again?