Huffington Post editors promote guilt-by-association by citing Forest's criticism of unwarranted e-cig use ban on trains

[Bill Godshall]

Huffington Post editors promote guilt-by-association by citing Forest’s criticism of unwarranted e-cigarette usage ban on trains.

[h=1]E-Cigarette Ban On Trains Branded 'Ludicrous' By Pro-Smoking Lobby Group
[URL]http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/08/12/electronic-cigarette-ban-train_n_3743408.html[/h][/URL]

Notice how the Huff Post editors included "pro-smoking lobby group" in the title of this article when there was no need to to do so.
While I'm pleased that Forest criticized the e-cig use ban on trains, it seems that Huff Post editors are doing everything they can to deceitfully equate vaping with smoking.

 

[WarHawk-AVG]

Now smokers (I mean vapers) can feel the sting of "guilt-by-association" to those of us in the firearm community

Does everyone see the danger of an agenda driven media vs one that is "objective" in their reporting

 

[pamdis]

Ummm, but it was a pro-smoking lobby that they were talking about.

 

[BigBen2k]

HuffPo UK, not USA.

Scary to see the quick poll; 1/3 believe in banning e-cigs.

 

[Vocalek]

Funny comment:

'Rail bosses also fear some passengers may become confused and mistake the steam vapours from the e-cigarettes for real smoke.' Are these the same people that think their kettles are burning?