Prediction: They're going to ban online sales of the nic, and mandate close-pod tamper-proof systems.
Of course, it will be due to the need for quality control, or stopping "illicit" substances, or whatever. But the end result is that you will only get it through "channels". How open those channels are? IDK.
It's already started:
WSJ News Exclusive | Sales of Illicit Vaping Products Find Home Online
Keep your hardware, keep your wire, keep your flavorings stock up on nic base. OR...accept the moderate future, owned by BT, but the plus side...the trade off...is reduced youth smoking (the literal smoking/combustibles) and maybe less nic addiction (I'm dubious, but that might be a goal out of BT too, at least for now).
E-cigs as we know them now, including Juul, are simply too successful. They have to make them "worse" to reduce rates.
You're basically stepping in front of a virtual-bullet to save the future-kids. It's amazing how people literally would step in front of a bullet to save their kids, but when it comes to highly successful nic products like Juul or really any vaping...we rationalize. "Oh, my rights! My vape!"
What if you asked me "Would you give up some of your vape-liberty in exchange for less deaths in the future generations?" Should I? Would I?
These are the questions I ask myself.
We as an industry were actually too good, but maybe too short sighted. It's not the flavors, it's the lack of nasty flavored deterrents. It's not the ease of use, it's the lack of the stink/danger/need-for-cleaning mess. It's not the open system, it's about the inability to hate BT when you have open systems...no common villain. There's not enough deterrent with modern vaping.
IDK. I'm rambling. Sorry. Waxing long-term philosophical.
But I think this trade-off deal was made a decade ago, or several decades ago. We in the grass-roots vaping community just didn't "get it". We actually made it too easy, too open, to acceptable.
And in a sense, we have to "save the children" not only from themselves, but maybe...just maybe...from us.
It's all give and take. That's life. IDK where any individual falls in the full spectrum of full issues here. Is all this God's will and inevitable, or a deal with the devil? And how much matters if the end goal is the same?
The real questions to me are: "Is there a 'third' option?" and "What is the best future, 80 years from now?"
But vaping as we know it will change. It's done, it's over, and been done for a long time. A lot of what you're hearing only makes sense in the larger context, because the individual points are B.S. It's all about the end-game, and it's a smokeless future. And about money and who controls the market. And deals.