I need the antifreeze thing cleared up

Status
Not open for further replies.

thana

Full Member
Sep 10, 2009
30
0
38
No one ever said PVs were 100% safe. The whole point is that they are safer/cleaner than tobacco smoke.

What people who use the "anti-freeze" arguement often fail to notice is that the 1% DEG is the WORST thing the FDA could find in ONE of the 18 carts tested and it's in much higher amounts in tobacco cigarettes! No tar, no arsenic, no ammonia, no carbon monoxide, etc...no one (Anti-PV) stops to think about how much cleaner that is than what is found in a real cigarettes.

The WORST thing they could manage to find was the 1% DEG, so they had to play it up. If they could have found anything worse than a tiny amount of DEG, you KNOW they would have been shouting it from the rooftops! Is DEG worse than inhaling arsenic or ammonia?

By ONLY finding the DEG as the "worst" ingredient, the FDA confirmed for me what I already knew - PVs are less toxic and, therefore, less deadly than tobacco smoking. And I don't use Smoking Everywhere 555 High brand cartridges, nor any tobacco flavors, so I'm not worried about DEG exposure, either!

I totally agree with you on this point. But at some point, we need to shift the argument from PV to Analogues, to PV to our bodies.
 

frankie1

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 7, 2009
796
660
Florida
Well that has pretty much been done. The information that we now have does not show any problem with PG or VG for that matter. The current information also suggests that nicotine in a form other than traditional cigarette smoking may be beneficial to certain individuals. The flavoring is the biggest question and that is mostly PG! The statement was made that we do not eat a gallon of icing a day...true, but I personally do not vape a gallon of eliquid a day and I suspect that no one else does either.

There is no way to do a long term study until the PV has been used LONG TERM. Until then, you can CHOOSE to believe they are better than analogs or you can choose to keep smoking or any choice in between. However, you cannot PROVE long term safety until they are used long term. I choose not to kill myself with analogs over the next 5-7 years that will be necessary to do that long term study.
 

frankie1

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 7, 2009
796
660
Florida
I use my 510 all day, but people need to understand that just because the FDA has cleared PG as "safe for human consumption" doesn't mean that it actually is safe in e-cigs. PG can be found in icing and skin products sure, but we are not ingesting or rubbing PG on our skins, we are vaporizing it. By doing this the avioli in our lungs are absorbing the PG into out bodies. It is a different delivery into our bodies and PG undergoes a phase change.

Are you totally disregarding the 1942 study that not only showed the inhalation of PG as safe, but actually beneficial in preventing flu?

Were you trying to indicate that you believe PG to be safe, but VG is not? Or were you attempting to discredit the notion that vaping should be, in absence of proof otherwise, GRAS?
 

kristin

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
10,448
21,120
CASAA - Wisconsin
casaa.org
I totally agree with you on this point. But at some point, we need to shift the argument from PV to Analogues, to PV to our bodies.

That's when you quit.

I doubt there will ever be a 100% safe PV. - you'll always be inhaling a foriegn substance into your lungs. It was invented to be a reduced harm product for those who can't or won't quit tobacco, not a 100% safe product.
 

Kent C

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 12, 2009
26,547
60,051
NW Ohio US
Are you totally disregarding the 1942 study that not only showed the inhalation of PG as safe, but actually beneficial in preventing flu?

That's correct. People who say "we don't know the long term effects of inhaling" haven't done their homework. The '42 (and '47 and later) studies that have been done on PG/VG factory workers have shown no long term effects.
 

BigJimW

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 17, 2009
2,058
7
61
Warwick, RI
www.moonport.org
Can somebody please help me cut this down so it is less harsh?

prestone.jpg


Would PG or VG go good?
 

pearlyvictoria

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Feb 15, 2011
83
9
california
Reading this post reminded me of something. One of my neighbors drank anti-freeze in an attempt to commit suicide. Brilliant man who was disappointed in the path his life took. He was laying on the curb and talking very loudly for about an hour. Thinking that he was just doing his usual schtick just to annoy us, we didn't pay attention at first. But feeling something was different this time, someone finally called the emergency crew. To wrap it up, I still see him sometimes volunteering at local festivals, the library and so on. The physical repercussions? He has a permanent slur and slight limp but is otherwise able to take care of himself. So, after ingesting antifreeze straight out of the container that is what the results are for him.
 

Kent C

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 12, 2009
26,547
60,051
NW Ohio US
Reading this post reminded me of something. One of my neighbors drank anti-freeze in an attempt to commit suicide. Brilliant man who was disappointed in the path his life took. He was laying on the curb and talking very loudly for about an hour. Thinking that he was just doing his usual schtick just to annoy us, we didn't pay attention at first. But feeling something was different this time, someone finally called the emergency crew. To wrap it up, I still see him sometimes volunteering at local festivals, the library and so on. The physical repercussions? He has a permanent slur and slight limp but is otherwise able to take care of himself. So, after ingesting antifreeze straight out of the container that is what the results are for him.

It's probably the fact that they started adding PG to the mix, is what saved him.
 

WomanOfHeart

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Sep 19, 2010
5,430
1,253
60
Colorado
You can find a Material Safety Data Sheet on PG. It isn't as safe as advertised. Probably a good idea not to chain vape.

HTH,
Dave

You mean THIS MSDS?

You'd have to chain vape without stopping for one hell of a long time, every day 24/7/365 before you would experience any over exposure. Make sure that you aren't reading the MSDS for Industrial Use PG. It's different from what we use in vaping.
 

wdave

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 11, 2009
1,491
115
Cincinnati, OH
You mean THIS MSDS?

You'd have to chain vape without stopping for one hell of a long time, every day 24/7/365 before you would experience any over exposure. Make sure that you aren't reading the MSDS for Industrial Use PG. It's different from what we use in vaping.

Everyone is on their own journey with ecigs. I eventually upped my nicotine concentration to 36 mg. At that level I no longer need to chain vape. I use my 510 more or less like a would a cigarette. And if I vape too long I get a nice warning signal--a headache :)

Thanks for posting the MSDS sweetheart. I can tell you like being well informed.

Dave
 

LKSkang

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 13, 2012
127
45
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
"Veterinary data indicate that propylene glycol is toxic to dogs with a 50% chance of being lethal at doses of 9mL/kg, although the figure is higher for most laboratory animals (LD50 at levels of 20mL/kg).[33]
However, propylene glycol may be toxic to cats in ways not seen in other animals. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has determined that its presence in or on cat food has not been shown by adequate scientific data to be safe for use. Any such use is considered an adulteration of the cat food and a violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act."

Propylene glycol - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Can someone explain this to me please? ESPECIALLY the bolded section? I have pets and this has gotten me a little worried :(
 

MadHatter

Sic itur ad astra
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 6, 2010
274
70
54
Waco, Texas
If your dog weighs 50 pounds, if it drank about a cup of PG there's a 50% chance it could die. Cats are apparently more susceptible than other animals.

But keep in mind, the nicotine levels in most juices would kill the pet in even lesser amounts of liquid.

So, use common sense and keep your e-liquids in a safe and secure spot so that kids and pets can't get to it.
 

Levitas

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 2, 2011
4,374
4,396
40
Saint Louis
If your dog weighs 50 pounds, if it drank about a cup of PG there's a 50% chance it could die. Cats are apparently more susceptible than other animals.

But keep in mind, the nicotine levels in most juices would kill the pet in even lesser amounts of liquid.

So, use common sense and keep your e-liquids in a safe and secure spot so that kids and pets can't get to it.

Well said.

Also, even though it isn't noted, I believe that the above doses is through ingestion, as opposed to inspiration (inhalation). Keep in mind your sources... wikipedia = take it with a grain of salt. I double checked the references used in that excerpt, and though the book seems legit, there was no way for me to compare actual information from the book. (Anyone can adjust, change, or post on wikipedia... anyone.)
 

LKSkang

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 13, 2012
127
45
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Also, even though it isn't noted, I believe that the above doses is through ingestion, as opposed to inspiration (inhalation).

That really puts my mind at ease... I always keep my e-liquids away from the reach of pets and/or children. I was more worried about the vapes.

Thanks!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread