OH, good! this'll be right up your alley then!
I'm thinkin' maybe we should try this again? . . . . and you kids should behave yourselves
- Thread starter pdib
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
You know he can't wait to share his new mod.
Should be posting pics any time now.
Yep, any minute.
Hmm, maybe he's waiting for a break in the clouds for better lighting.
Should be posting pics any time now.
Yep, any minute.
Hmm, maybe he's waiting for a break in the clouds for better lighting.
You know he can't wait to share his new mod.
Should be posting pics any time now.
Yep, any minute.
Hmm, maybe he's waiting for a break in the clouds for better lighting.
Should be posting pics any time now.
Yep, any minute.
Hmm, maybe he's waiting for a break in the clouds for better lighting.
Congratulations!
That ought to keep you smiling
Errrr. I was referring to a different sumpin' going on. Different thread. But still, congratulations!
That ought to keep you smiling
Errrr. I was referring to a different sumpin' going on. Different thread. But still, congratulations!
Lmao..I can't help it,..it's true it was all Kogijiki's fault.
HOLY WOW..there really WAS something going on and I didn't even know it at the time...
always, always listen to your Mama, C
I'm in Seattle right now and if he's waiting for a break in the clouds he's gonna have to sit in the driveway with the camera in ready to shoot at a seconds notice.
Well, I detailed it (fine sanding), oiled it, got it all assembled, and got that second switch on there, and it was a little long. So, I put a ccouple crimps in it to get it positioned right, and now it don't look so pretty anymore. So, I guess there's one more switch in the making. I had no intention of posting any pics or vids tonight. I'd been aiming to have something to show y'all later tomorrow.
So, I just had another failed attempt at the switch piece. Meaning, things are happening that I don't expect when I'm working the materials. So that means I have a bit of a learning curve to reliably achieve the physical specs and aesthetic results that I have pictured in brain. No biggie; but I'm not gonna let it hold up the run or the "show-me". Looks like I'm going to present with a less than stellar switch tomorrow, with some description of what it is I'm shooting for. That'll give you kids plenty of time to shoot down the circuit concept I have going on while I work on the switch in the off hours and move along with run#9.
Speaking of which, this is a really simple internals scenario; but it's doing everything exactly that I want to see done. One of those things is getting the make/break contact away from the battery. When I made the Dublin'(s), the make/break was silver-on-silver and isolated from the battery. Well, I've been noticing that I rarely, almost never, have to clean the contacts and (as they're exposed) I can never see a visible spark at the make/break either (lights off and all). . . . . and I'm consistently running a 0.16Ω build in there. This got me to very unscientifically suspecting that the coating on our battery contacts is designed for good conductivity; but with no mind to it being a make/break. Furthermore, whatever contact material we use, it's certainly not of the exact same composition and conductive properties as the coating on a battery. With an external, silver/silver contact, I'm hoping to arrive at some of the same benefits as I'm seeing in the Dublin'. Mind you, it's nothing like it structurally. It's a top switch. Also, just by happenstance, I've got that neg. leg running straight to the atomizer. (not to the 510 . . .. to the atomizer).
Speaking of which, this is a really simple internals scenario; but it's doing everything exactly that I want to see done. One of those things is getting the make/break contact away from the battery. When I made the Dublin'(s), the make/break was silver-on-silver and isolated from the battery. Well, I've been noticing that I rarely, almost never, have to clean the contacts and (as they're exposed) I can never see a visible spark at the make/break either (lights off and all). . . . . and I'm consistently running a 0.16Ω build in there. This got me to very unscientifically suspecting that the coating on our battery contacts is designed for good conductivity; but with no mind to it being a make/break. Furthermore, whatever contact material we use, it's certainly not of the exact same composition and conductive properties as the coating on a battery. With an external, silver/silver contact, I'm hoping to arrive at some of the same benefits as I'm seeing in the Dublin'. Mind you, it's nothing like it structurally. It's a top switch. Also, just by happenstance, I've got that neg. leg running straight to the atomizer. (not to the 510 . . .. to the atomizer).
Congrats Keepsmiling!
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
