I think there is too much policing of teens these days, and it's a shame. When I was young, if something "bad" happened, the parents would call each other, or talk to school personnel, etc. These days, parents have little involvement and then the police "catch" and create future criminals. The Juvenile Prison in my town is pretty epically awful. My stepdad used to work there and I've visited kiddo's I worked with there. Locked up, and with a "record" that they will later have to "expunge" if they are lucky. It's policing for profit around here, and I don't like it one bit.
When my son finally asked to go to a public HS, I let him. I also got to know school staff, and other parents. But it's a LOT harder these days. When my kiddo decided to "unfriend" a gang member in 10th grade because he was getting in too much trouble, I hauled my .... in to the (new, from Chicago) principal who had basically turned a "functional but steady, but not great situation" into a pressure cooker by thinking he could "crack down" on the gang kids. He thought he was pretty tough, but I have worked with a LOT of gang kids here, and they're vicious, and nothing like Chicago. So he created a simmering powder keg of awful by "cracking down" on illicit teen stuff.
He was quite surprised when I showed up in his office, and demanded to know how he was going to keep my kid "safe" in school. His "opinion" was the fight was "after hours," and my opinion went on a LONG time but basically contained the following facts:
1) You are big and "tough" and think you can fix juvenile gangs, so why aren't you going to give me a safety plan moving forward?
2) My son and the gang kid both attend your school, what will you do?
3) Okay, nothing? Let's get my kid withdrawn TODAY and he can complete his GED because if you can't maintain a safe environment I will not subject my son to this.
4) My husband got so mad he called the media and our governor and eventually that school got safety support personnel and the new principal it needed AFTER a kid got badly damaged, but it wasn't MY kid.
Teens need a certain amount of illicit activity to learn life lessons, but they also need a container of safety, and that should be the school, the parents, NOT the police. Not unless it gets really, really bad.
But mainly, kids today have so little structure and parental involvement in many cases, they don't get good outcomes by being "charged" with every offense.
If I had been "charged" with every offense, I'd still be locked up today, I think. But with parental involvement and school involvement, well, I got consequences:
Stuff like rehabs, residential treatment facilities, etc., things that at LEAST allowed me to address my problems, not get charged and treated like a criminal. Some teens are animals but most aren't and rehabs and RTCs aren't perfect, but they sure are better than hauling around a juvenile "record" that stays with you for life.
I think it's almost better to NOT charge kids at all as juveniles, unless it's something INSANELY major. For many kids around here, it's stuff like drinking alcohol in a public place. That should result in family therapy and etc. progressing up as needed, not an "open container" charge and then the police put that kid on their watch list.
We need police. We even need police SOMETIMES for kids. But mostly, kids need good parents and good schools.
Just my thoughts, as always.
Anna