Is this acceptable Registered Supplier behavior?

[MagnusEunson]

EDIT: Post voluntarily removed... Roly addressed the thread ~one hour after this post and as he said nothing, I assume that's that. Moving on.. -Magnus

 

[rolygate]

People need all possible information in order to make up their minds, and I found nothing offensive in this thread, so it appears on the surface to be a valid discussion that can be left visible. I closed the thread as all that can be said appears to have been said.

I have no idea what this is all about, in terms of any larger debate, as that is a matter for our Forum Manager and/or Complaints Officer (see the Contacts page). If someone has a complaint about a member then they should report it to the Forum Manager, and a complaint about a Supplier should be sent to the Complaints Officer.

Those admins would be aware of any ongoing issues, if any have been reported.

 

[MagnusEunson]

Thank you, it was just the "Box Elder" bit that I thought was ~new~.. the rest is the way it's been since the beginning. I was just trying to figure out how/why Box Elder was pulled into it. Cheers, -Magnus

 

[rolygate]

Please do not remove the content of Post #1 as it renders all subsequent discussion meaningless and pointless - and is incredibly annoying. This is why I prefer to have a 45 minute limit on post editing, though since this is apparently not the view of the Mods, it is currently much longer than this. I view this as a mistake but the team works by compromise, so it is as it is. However abuse of this privilege will certainly lead to it being removed as there is a limit to my tolerance of annoyance

 

[MagnusEunson]

Roly, I removed #1 before your first comment above. ~15m before and in deference and out of respect to the fact you had just gone and visited the subject thread and addressed it how you saw fit. It was an honest intent and you can verify the edit date/time against your post #2. My apologies if I caused you further grief, -Magnus

 

[rolygate]

Understood.