Just for laughs.. A comment I made regarding of those "scientific studies"

[GBalkam]

So a bit of back story.. Regarding http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0116861

The "test" was to administer 35ml of ejuice in a 2 second puff, every 10 seconds, for an hour and a half, twice a day, for 2 weeks. (I suppose 36 ml tended to asphyxiate the mice within the first few minutes). I also suggested they save time and money, and just fill a 500ml beaker with ejuice and drown the mice in it.. much more cost effective and humane.
You can check my other comments on the comments page. I was not gentle. however.. here is my last comment:

I'm wondering.. how many mice either resumed or started smoking cigarettes after vaping for 2 weeks?

I'm guessing none, but you will have to confirm that. However, pending your results disproving this assumption, I can state that since (unless you state otherwise) none of the mice are currently smoking cigarettes, e-cigs are a successful means of quitting smoking and do not in fact act as a gateway to tobacco smoking.

They had it coming....

 

[mcclintock]

It doesn't say 35 ml of ejuice. How many of the NJoy's they're using would it take to use 35 ml of ejuice?

 

[retired1]

The "test" was to administer 35ml of ejuice in a 2 second puff, every 10 seconds, for an hour and a half, twice a day, for 2 weeks. (I suppose 36 ml tended to asphyxiate the mice within the first few minutes). I also suggested they save time and money, and just fill a 500ml beaker with ejuice and drown the mice in it.. much more cost effective and humane.

>.<

The 2 second puff (35ml) refers to the volume of air that was created.

In the future, unless you thoroughly understand the study, please refrain from commenting on them. Your comments hurt the cause more than it helps.

 

[GBalkam]

>.<

The 2 second puff (35ml) refers to the volume of air that was created.

In the future, unless you thoroughly understand the study, please refrain from commenting on them. Your comments hurt the cause more than it helps.

Oh so 1800 puffs a day, 600 per hour for 3 hours, every day for 2 weeks is a realistic dosage? Even at air volume, I have never seen a mouse with 35ml lung volume. I've never seen a 35 ml mouse. I challenged their methods and results. Now if you want to bend over and take what they give ya, that's up to you. According to that logic, you would all still be paying taxes on your tea.

 

[retired1]

Just.. stop. It's obvious you don't understand the study, nor do you understand the methodology used.

As such, closing.