Wondertwin:8393256 said:The biggest single issue here to me is not warmfuzzy vendor feelings, rather slowing down meaningful innovation through deceptive practice. If a cheap, poorly performing knock off puts what could be the beginning of an excellent product on the bottom tier, we're the ones who lose.
The nature of this hobby or practice is disposable. Why? Does it have to be? Maybe. If manufacturers had to evolve their product to a more lasting one, they absolutely would for the almighty dollar. They'd also be a lot more likely to stand behind their product, which would likely translate to online vendors standing behind more of what they sell. They simply don't have to now due the accepted disposable nature of what they carry. rba's you say! Replaceable vivi heads! Yes, but should paying a marked up (severely in some cases) price for the privilege of kanthal tinkering and wicking practice and mesh cutting and Lord knows what else be the norm?
Further, should this even be *available* when not all mods/batteries have the safeties or circuitry in place to test these projects safely? We, the customers, are not only pushing along evolution of the business with our wallets. We're also the tech, Q&A, manufacturing, creative department, and guinea pigs for the industry. I've never seen ECF call out a vendor, but I have seen product recalls and user posted pictures of "HORRY SHEET LOOK WHAT HAPPENED! AVOID!" stuff posted. On one hand, consumer driven innovation is great. On the other, should the masses have to be hostage to a host of imposters or shady sites to accomplish this?
When has innovation been stifled in this industry?