FDA MBV says FDA has bottle size restriction?

[Lessifer]

Does anyone know if the restricted flow portion of the PPPA applies to e-liquid? If so, it's likely the bulk bottles don't conform to CRP standards, since they don't have nozzles.

 

[Racehorse]

never mind got off topic about DIY..........

 

[Kent C]

Of note, Keller and Heckman also the attorneys for this group. which is the same as for the nicopure group

Nicopure Labs, LLC, Plaintiff
Represented by Covington & Burling, LLP

RIGHT TO BE SMOKE-FREE COALITION, Plaintiff
Represented by KELLER & HECKMAN, LLP

....is how it is listed in retired2's post, and I don't know if the consolidation changed representation or that they are both working the case.

 

[Robert Cromwell]

The large bottles with the ketchup bottle style lid is now illegal as it is not child resistant per the new law.

 

[Robert Cromwell]

Does anyone know if the restricted flow portion of the PPPA applies to e-liquid? If so, it's likely the bulk bottles don't conform to CRP standards, since they don't have nozzles.

yep approved child resistant tops only. As outlined by the CPSC I think it is.

 

[memeticengineone]

Everything in vaping is going to heck and I can't even afford to stock in DIY supplies... This is a disaster. I am not going back to cigarettes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Lessifer]

Everything in vaping is going to heck and I can't even afford to stock in DIY supplies... This is a disaster. I am not going back to cigarettes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You'll be okay. At the very least, you know what's coming, and where to come for help when you need it.

 

[LittleBird]

The right to be smoke-free coalition's motion for summary judgment was due yesterday. I can't find the text or any indication that it was filed.

It was filed. Haven't seen the text, yet.

ETA: Tobacco On Trial » Blog Archive » RIGHT TO BE SMOKE-FREE COALITION, et al. v. FDA: PLAINTIFF TRADE ASSOCIATIONS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, July 25, 2016

 

[bigdancehawk]

It was filed. Haven't seen the text, yet.

ETA: Tobacco On Trial » Blog Archive » RIGHT TO BE SMOKE-FREE COALITION, et al. v. FDA: PLAINTIFF TRADE ASSOCIATIONS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, July 25, 2016

Thank you. I'm glad they got something filed. But the important filing is the memorandum of points and authorities which, although referenced in the motion, isn't posted or linked there.

 

[retired1]

As mentioned earlier, Pacer usually has a copy of all the documents related to a case, but you have to pay to view 'em.

 

[LittleBird]

Thank you. I'm glad they got something filed. But the important filing is the memorandum of points and authorities which, although referenced in the motion, isn't posted or linked there.

The memorandum is linked at the top of the page that I posted, above. . Interesting read.

 

[bigdancehawk]

Thank you. I'm glad they got something filed. But the important filing is the memorandum of points and authorities which, although referenced in the motion, isn't posted or linked there.

Thanks. For some reason the link didn't show up on my Android thingie.

 

[LittleBird]

Thanks. For some reason the link didn't show up on my Android thingie.

Here you go. Tobacco On Trial » Blog Archive » RIGHT TO BE SMOKE-FREE COALITION, et al. v. FDA: MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF TRADE ASSOCIATIONS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, July 25, 2016

 

[bigdancehawk]

Here you go. Tobacco On Trial » Blog Archive » RIGHT TO BE SMOKE-FREE COALITION, et al. v. FDA: MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF TRADE ASSOCIATIONS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, July 25, 2016

Good brief, focused primarily on the grandfather date, how it would wreck the industry and how the FDA failed to consider reasonable alternatives.