The Whole basis of this post seems to be that mech mods are dangerous, and mech mods aren't ecigs. It's like you want to throw an entire subset of vapers under the bus to save yourself.
Why not?The Whole basis of this post seems to be that mech mods are dangerous, and mech mods aren't ecigs. It's like you want to throw an entire subset of vapers under the bus to save yourself.
Yea! And ECF was named incorrectly.Umm guys? Technically OP was correct. A mech mod is an electric cigarette, not an electronic cigarette.
Electric Versus Electronic Systems
Don't start talking about bioelectronics or the FDA will decide the user is part of a nicotine delivery system and will want to regulate us.The definition for electronic, of or relating to the movement of electrons, is too general to use in law as it would include living organisms and many other things that were not intended.
As an aside, let us all remember that while sub-ohming is popular, using a mech is NOT synonymous with the practice.
Why not?
Words like "safe" or "dangerous" are opinions, debatable, subjective. "Risk" is quantifiable. Mechs are higher risk for injury accidents. Both government and the vape industry understand that but each, for different reasons, don't want to clarify the difference for the sake of public safety. I have a problem with that.The Whole basis of this post seems to be that mech mods are dangerous, and mech mods aren't ecigs. It's like you want to throw an entire subset of vapers under the bus to save yourself.
Words like "safe" or "dangerous" are opinions, debatable, subjective. "Risk" is quantifiable. Mechs are higher risk for injury accidents.
It also isn't necessary to sub-ohm to use a mechanical.
(my 8 amp batteries (18490s) handle a 2.3 amp load quite nicely)
Words like "safe" or "dangerous" are opinions, debatable, subjective. "Risk" is quantifiable. Mechs are higher risk for injury accidents. Both government and the vape industry understand that but each, for different reasons, don't want to clarify the difference for the sake of public safety. I have a problem with that.
My source is news reports found in Google searches. Based on those virtually all injury accidents while vaping involve mechanical mods.What's your source? I have not found a quantified risk assessment of each.
What carries more risk, using a very sharp knife or one that is less sharp? Racecar driving or highway driving in a sedan?
In their response to a pending lawsuit the FDA says "electronic cigarettes" need to be regulated like pharmecutical drugs in part because they blow up. That's a lie and a smear and the FDA knows it. It's nobody's business whether people use mechs but I'm not going along with making no distincition. Mech's are risky devices that do blow up and do hurt people and they are NOT "electronic" cigarettes. In the response to the FDA in the pending court case I would call them out for being intentionally misleading about the difference. In court everybody is supposed to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, right?
Mechs aren't electronic cigarettes because they have no electronics. When news reports say an "electronic cigarette" exploded they are always talking about mechs, which are not, in any way shape or form, regulated by any sort of electronics therefore they should not be called electronic cigarettes. That may sound like a quibble but it's not. May be making the distincition will help the public understand the difference.
I can imagine they got a really good laugh whenever they came up with that one. so very apropos.I just got the memo ... mechs will no longer be called electronic cigarettes
The FDA has renamed them ENDS![]()
The whole safety issue should be left up to the CPSC and not the FDA.
My source is news reports found in Google searches. Based on those virtually all injury accidents while vaping involve mechanical mods.
My source is news reports found in Google searches. Based on those virtually all injury accidents while vaping involve mechanical mods.