>
I read your response above with interest. Something is awry, though.
I've made a conscious effort to pause and simulate the double clutch without actually re-pressing the switch. I have alternated the pseudo double clutch with the actual act on a one for one basis since reading your response last night. I'm guess-timating about 100 drags. Each and every time the actual double clutch gives a significantly stronger
throat hit. I mean,
significant. It is analogous from a Lucky Strike to Marlboro Light kind of difference.
I'm wondering if we are performing it the same way to have such diverse results. As Julie so aptly described it, it is a long, slow, steady pull until the JS reaches the red line (pardon my car racing days expression lol). Then, it's release the button and re-press it for a second or two while never opening the mouth for the inhale until the short "re-hit" is complete. The pseudo double clutch is the same procedure sans re-pressing the button.
I absolutely get a stronger hit with the actual double clutch. The thought here is one of electrical in nature. There is an initial voltage surge to the coil/atty when one presses the button to complete the circuit. As one takes that first slow hit to the red line, he/she is heating up the coil (from cold) to it's near utmost point, thus the built-in safety cut-off of the JS. Hitting the switch momentarily the second time is sending a new voltage surge to an already hot atty which super heats the vapor and gives the stronger
throat hit. In essence, what the double clutch does is defeat the overheat safety built into the JS circuitry. In all likelihood it is a potential atty killer. Or, it could be an atty life enhancer/extender by simulating the equivalent of a dry burn-off. Or neither of the above. LOL How's that for a scientific discovery? <g>