We have a saying around my house... "There's little better than having a great union, but there's nothing worse than having a

union."
The biggest problem with the ADA is that it was never meant to be final legislation - even former Sen Tony Coelho and Sen. Kennedy, who wrote it, said that. It was meant to be foot-in-the-door legislation to pave the way for something more concrete, and as such, it's pretty mealy-mouthed. If I say to a business owner, "hey man, you're the only store that carries X for 50 miles, and I need X, so you need to put in a ramp," and he says "how about I just bring X to you and we conduct this transaction outside?"... technically, he can argue that's a "reasonable" accommodation. It's not reasonable to *me*, and if I took it to court, a *judge* would not find it reasonable, since there are federal funds available to put a ramp on your place of business and all I'm asking for is a ramp.... but there's the rub. At the end of the day, to get that ramp in, I'd have to have the time, energy, and money and/or representation to take it to court.
That's the gap between the text of the law and the actual day to day of being able to enforce it, and it's all down to that weasel word "reasonable." That was my school's excuse too, "hey, crawl up the stairs, there, you've been reasonably accommodated!" Of course it's not, but what was I going to do, take it to court? (Why yes, I was. Unfortunately, life intervened. Long story.) But there was certainly no way to *quickly* rebut "crawl up the stairs," and even if I had sued, if you have enough money you can just settle everything out of court... which is what that school does. I'd like to think I wouldn't have taken a settlement, but as a working class kid who just wanted to go to school for god's sake, if they'd offered me $10 mill (their going rate) to go away? God, that's enough money to make sure my sister would be okay for her whole life, buy my mom a nice house, buy my dad another Harley, pump up both of their retirement funds, go to school, and still have enough to stick plenty in *my* retirement fund. It would have been sorely, sorely tempting to say the least.
And that's why the ADA is a broken law, and it was broken from the moment it was written. If a business doesn't feel like complying, or doesn't understand the spirit of the law, there are zero consequences a disabled person *happens* to notice and then *happens* to have the resources (not just money, but time and energy, which are at much higher premiums for most of us) to sue. No one's doublechecking for compliance, explaining why compliance is important, or reminding businesses that compliance benefits them financially. After all, if I can get in, I can spend money, but that ramp isn't *mine* - if I can get in, so can the mom with the stroller, the employee who broke his ankle, and the rich old guy whose knees aren't quite up to stairs anymore.
Indeed. I'm glad you can see it. I spend so much time arguing with people who can't see that (in the process of trying to fix it) that sometimes I start to wonder if I'm the one who's crazy.
No worries, I didn't take it as a rant, and I appreciate the ego boost and the moral support. It's always a good thing to have more people in your corner.
So yeah, it's on schedule. Are you?