Natural Tobaccos - Part Deux

Status
Not open for further replies.

regal55

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 20, 2013
1,353
525
york,PA
How Is EtherVapes in comparison to stronger tobacco types like Ahlusion Flavored Aero's or NET.com?

Jerms,

My experience parallels yours, with the possible exception that I'm even less certain of the validity of my conclusions than you seem to be.

When I read Johni's post---I can't remember what thread he posted it in, one of the home extractor threads probably---it was literally the first time I'd been exposed to the idea that sugars might cause gunking. Now, I trust that Johni has his head screwed on straight, so I took in what he wrote in one bite, and with less than my usual skepticism. What you and I have been tossing around in this exchange is a sort of backtracking to run the presumption through various reality checks, with the caveat that both of us acknowledge uncertainty about what's "real."

At this point, I'm inclined to go with your point of view. If sugars do cause gunking and carbon build-up, I'm guessing that they contribute to those effects in only a very minor way. Particulates and other organic compounds that leech into the maceration solvent from the tobacco still seem to me the most likely suspect on which to pin the crime.

In that vein, I just re-coiled/wicked the heads of five Evod-style clearos that I've been using on Vision Spinner clones and iTaste V3 batteries for my best homemade cigar NETs. I didn't bother dry-burning the coils, since they were all heavily crusted, and anyway I had 50 pre-made coil/wick assemblies (NR-R-NR 32ga wire, 1.5 ohms) from fasttech all ready to go. Rebuilding the Evod heads by swapping out the coils and flavor wicks was almost as fast as dry-burning, with much better results. The restoration of flavor and uptick in vapor production were instantaneous and quite dramatic. The old coils and flavor wicks lasted for about a month of moderate daily vaping (maybe 10 minutes per day on average), but probably should have been changed a week or two ago.

Thing is, my cigar extracts are really fairly clean performers, relatively speaking. Just goes to show that macerated NETs require at least periodic and often frequent coil/wick maintenance. But so what? Changing coils and wicks is a small price to pay for the delicious experience that good macerated NETs offer.


I've switched to 100% RDA's for any NET, the Kayfun is such a chore to rebuild in comparison to a dripper and coils for clearomizers are expensive. I use the same premade coils from fast tech, I highly recommend these they are very small and made of thin wire but they really pump out the flavor in a dripper (I use the brass monkey just because it is so easy to build.) I still use my clearos for long work days but with fruit juices, by lunch time I am craving a hit of net off the dripper.
 

johni

Extractor
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 8, 2012
2,007
5,908
Columbia, Missouri
Bill hit the nail on the head IMO. Sweetness of a juice does not necessarily indicate the presence of sugar. I got some confirmation of my suspicions about sugars in tobacco casings from a vendor post. Sugar molecules are much smaller than one micron so you could repeatedly filter through one micron media and still have a result that will gunk coils. Makes sense to me but what the hell do I know, I'm a carpenter not a chemist!:laugh:
 

sandman97289

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 16, 2014
173
239
San Jose, CA, USA
Tonight I've been dripping RBFS's Petner's Pipe in a Delasco rayon wicked Atomic.

I was fairly surprised by this. I was guessing it would be more heavely cased like Pirate's and Caven Feven, but it's not. The flavoring it's been topped or cased with is playing a pretty minor role. It's more like Fab&Burley than Pirates, but the tobacco's added flavors are more subtle than the vanilla in F&B. After a couple hours I detect what I think is raisin, but no rum yet.

The tobaccos are Virginia and Burley. It's stronger than the tobacco in F&B, about a medium in tobacco impact. It's leafy, a touch nutty, and overall a pretty dry sweetness level. The raisin and rum seem to modify the tobacco instead of having their own presence. That may change during future sessions and as it steeps, but I have no idea.

I was underwhelmed at first, a big reason being I was expecting stronger rum and raisin flavors with a sweetness instead of this drier pipe tobacco, but it grew on me fairly quick because it's a very solid tobacco flavor. Petner's Pipe doesn't have the unique flavor I was preparing myself for, but there is something different going on under the surface. It'll be an easy one to grab for, and will be fun to see what layers and subtleties may be revealed in time.

Nice description of Petner's Pipe. I wasn't that impressed either when I tried it, but I put it off to maybe needing more steeping. To me it had an almost artificial taste to it, even though I know that it's a naturally extracted cigar. It even had a funny pinkish color to it on my cotton while vaping. I'll give it another go in a day or two to see if the taste improved.
 

sandman97289

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 16, 2014
173
239
San Jose, CA, USA
Jerms,

My experience parallels yours, with the possible exception that I'm even less certain of the validity of my conclusions than you seem to be.

When I read Johni's post---I can't remember what thread he posted it in, one of the home extractor threads probably---it was literally the first time I'd been exposed to the idea that sugars might cause gunking. Now, I trust that Johni has his head screwed on straight, so I took in what he wrote in one bite, and with less than my usual skepticism. What you and I have been tossing around in this exchange is a sort of backtracking to run the presumption through various reality checks, with the caveat that both of us acknowledge uncertainty about what's "real."

At this point, I'm inclined to go with your point of view. If sugars do cause gunking and carbon build-up, I'm guessing that they contribute to those effects in only a very minor way. Particulates and other organic compounds that leech into the maceration solvent from the tobacco still seem to me the most likely suspect on which to pin the crime.

In that vein, I just re-coiled/wicked the heads of five Evod-style clearos that I've been using on Vision Spinner clones and iTaste V3 batteries for my best homemade cigar NETs. I didn't bother dry-burning the coils, since they were all heavily crusted, and anyway I had 50 pre-made coil/wick assemblies (NR-R-NR 32ga wire, 1.5 ohms) from Fasttech all ready to go. Rebuilding the Evod heads by swapping out the coils and flavor wicks was almost as fast as dry-burning, with much better results. The restoration of flavor and uptick in vapor production were instantaneous and quite dramatic. The old coils and flavor wicks lasted for about a month of moderate daily vaping (maybe 10 minutes per day on average), but probably should have been changed a week or two ago.

Thing is, my cigar extracts are really fairly clean performers, relatively speaking. Just goes to show that macerated NETs require at least periodic and often frequent coil/wick maintenance. But so what? Changing coils and wicks is a small price to pay for the delicious experience that good macerated NETs offer.

After all of these discussions I think there are just a lot of variables in the picture; amount of sugar from NET, amount of particulates, the maceration techniques, PG/VG ratio, type of coil used, wattage while vaping and even the wick material to name a few. That being said I'll be experimenting for some time and report back my findings.
 

johni

Extractor
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 8, 2012
2,007
5,908
Columbia, Missouri
Here you go:

Filtering Net is more about removing undesirable tobacco particles, than it is about creating a coil safe NET solution.

The main corporate to coils “gunk” up is sugars in the extract, the more sugar, the faster it “gunks” up. This can be tested by doing the following:

Control Base: pure PG (100ml)

Solution #1: pure PG with 15g pure sugar

Solution #2: pure PG with 30g pure sugar

Solution #3: pure PG with 45g pure sugar

If you test the 4 solutions above, you will find that the more sugar the faster the coils gunk up. Mind you, the speed in which they gunk up between them, will not be dramatic.

This is also the case when mixing weaker NET solutions. The coils still gunk up at basically the same rate. The difference maybe as subtle as vaping 2mls for a strong solution, and vaping 4mls for weaker solutions, before you get the undesirable “burnt” taste.

Sugar is the main problem. Undesirable and desirable tobacco particles play a smaller role. You can test this by replacing the Pure PG with the finished NET solution. You will find the results are negligible.

Now looking at sugar as it relates to a liquid solution, from a practical real world perspective.

There is basically no practical and affordable way for a small home based lab or small business lab to separate glucose from a liquid solution, and maintain the desired finish product results.

A glucose molecule, within a liquid solution, is 10 Angstroms or about 0.001 micron

A water molecule is less than 3 Angstroms or about 0.0001 micron

These micron levels are beyond the scope of affordable and practical filtration.

Point being, if you repeatedly filtered a NET solution with an absolute 1 micron filter, the amount of sugar that you would remove would be negligible, at best.

Secondly.

Sugar itself is a “taste” or flavor on its own. Without sugar or sweetness, most if not all the flavors we vape would be undesirable, in general.

If your end product is a sweet or semi sweet solutions, then it would not make since to filter out all the sugars.

If you took a solution with water and sugar, and passed it through a filter process down to 0.001 micron, to remove the sugar. The end result would be water. Defeating the purpose. This would also remove most if not all of the desirable flavors as well.

In my opinion, if we want to enjoy NET juice, we have to get use to gunk up coils.
 

regal55

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 20, 2013
1,353
525
york,PA
Bill hit the nail on the head IMO. Sweetness of a juice does not necessarily indicate the presence of sugar. I got some confirmation of my suspicions about sugars in tobacco casings from a vendor post. Sugar molecules are much smaller than one micron so you could repeatedly filter through one micron media and still have a result that will gunk coils. Makes sense to me but what the hell do I know, I'm a carpenter not a chemist!:laugh:


Sugar dissolves, we can't filter out anything that dissolves, only particulate that stay in suspension. When you think about it unless you shred your tobacco there shouldn't be much micron sized tobacco in the extract. I know there is but that is from the shredder when they process the tobacco. Maybe a good thing to do is wash the tobacco with a solvent in which the flavors aren't very soluble, like VG. Do that before the extraction and it may was away the tobacco "dust."
 
Last edited:

regal55

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 20, 2013
1,353
525
york,PA
How Is EtherVapes in comparison to stronger tobacco types like Ahlusion Flavored Aero's or NET.com?


I wouldn't say ether vaps is less strong than net.com, they have maybe less refinement but are still a fantastic vap. I really like elipse and confederate. I also ordered nomad to try. My experience with net.com is limited but all I've tried is like the crem dala crème of nets, hopefully his business will pull thru. I don't like Ahl at all its like comparing apples and oranges and don't consider their processs really produces an authentic tobacco experience but we all have different taste buds..
 
Last edited:

checkum

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 8, 2014
788
1,849
Missouri, USA
Bill hit the nail on the head IMO. Sweetness of a juice does not necessarily indicate the presence of sugar. I got some confirmation of my suspicions about sugars in tobacco casings from a vendor post. Sugar molecules are much smaller than one micron so you could repeatedly filter through one micron media and still have a result that will gunk coils. Makes sense to me but what the hell do I know, I'm a carpenter not a chemist!:laugh:

Yeah, yeah, you may be a carpenter, but you sure can also build some ultra fine extractions! :2c:
 

papabogart

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 15, 2013
513
827
Satis, Faction
Apologies to the vendor/author, but I don't find his analysis useful, leave alone conclusive.

The main corporate to coils “gunk” up is sugars in the extract, the more sugar, the faster it “gunks” up. This can be tested by doing the following:

Control Base: pure PG (100ml)

Solution #1: pure PG with 15g pure sugar

Solution #2: pure PG with 30g pure sugar

Solution #3: pure PG with 45g pure sugar

If you test the 4 solutions above, you will find that the more sugar the faster the coils gunk up. Mind you, the speed in which they gunk up between them, will not be dramatic.

This is also the case when mixing weaker NET solutions. The coils still gunk up at basically the same rate. The difference maybe as subtle as vaping 2mls for a strong solution, and vaping 4mls for weaker solutions, before you get the undesirable “burnt” taste.

Sugar is the main problem. Undesirable and desirable tobacco particles play a smaller role. You can test this by replacing the Pure PG with the finished NET solution. You will find the results are negligible.

The main reason that a mixture of gasoline and water will ignite and burn is the alcohol in the gasoline. the more alcohol, the easier to ignite and the longer the burn. This can be tested by doing the following:

Control Base: pure water (100ml)

Solution #1: pure water with 10ml of pure alcohol

Solution #2: pure water with 30ml of pure alcohol

Solution #3: pure water with 90ml of pure alcohol

If you test the 4 solutions above, you will find that the more alcohol, the easier the solution ignites and the longer the burn.

Therefor, alcohol is the main catalyst for ignition and burn. Gasoline plays a smaller role. You can test this by replacing the water with gasoline and adding the varying amounts of alcohol. You will find the results are negligible.
 
Last edited:

Jerms

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 1, 2011
9,252
25,832
Fargo
Vaping Petner's Pipe again all morning, very satisfying pipe tobacco. If someone's worried that a raisin and rum tobacco vape might be too odd, I don't think they'll find an issue with the flavor, but if someone wants a strong raisin and rum experience they will probably be disappointed. Me, I happen to like this quite a bit.

I think I'll give KillrY4 a session later today when I get home.
 

Frankenmizer

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 6, 2013
570
972
Dimension V
The Two-Tank Test

The test is simple. Take one Aspire Nautilus Mini and vape two tankfuls - about 4ml - through one coil.
Subjectively evaluate the juice for vapor, throat hit, and flavor.
Objectively observe coil life.

Why evaluate juice in an Aspire Mini BVC? Because it appears to be the current best-of-breed clearomizer. It is one step up from entry-level rigs, and one step below RDA's and RBA's. The Bottom Vertical Coil (BVC) head is very transparent, i.e., the ceramic wicking material does not color juice flavor at all, at least to my palate. The Mini BVC is a darned good middle-of-the-road setup. Its convenience and ease-of-use, combined with its flavor transparency make it a standout.


Smokie says the standard loadout of Smug Juice is 70VG/30PG. This shows in the initial shake of the bottle. The very small bubbles produced stay stuck at the top as the juice runs back down the bottle sides more slowly than the usual PG-dominant mix.

About Cuban Perfecto: Sumg Juice says: "You used to have to travel south of the border to taste the flavor of a real Cuban cigar. Now you can get that luxurious taste right here at home with our Cuban Perfecto. The extract is made from 100% Cuban seed tobacco leaves that are aged to perfection.."

So what is Cuban seed tobacco? According to Cigar Advisor, "..when a manufacturer refers to “Cuban seed,” they are most often referring to “heirloom” seeds selected from tobacco plants originally grown from native Cuban seeds." Other sources indicate "Cuban seed" is hybridized from Habano, Corojo, and Criollo varieties.

The juice is a mid-range amber color, darker than SJ's HUMP. I detected little to no aroma from the raw juice itself in my standard 18mg strength.


Vapor: Good to very good, in line with what one would expect from a 70VG/30PG blend.

Throat Hit: Solid. Very good.

Flavor: Smooth. Ephemeral to the point of nonexistence in the Mini tank with air flow set fully open. I took the air flow down a notch. Only then did I start to get recognizable flavor notes. My first thought was, "This is Managua Light", i.e. very reminiscent of Want2Vape's "vision of a dark, oily Corojo-wrapped maduro, lightly toasted." The best I can say is that perhaps Cuban Perfecto needs steep time. I'll try it again in a week or two and see if it improves. But fresh out of the bottle, there's not much to write home about. I ran my ZNA from 8 to 17 watts in one-watt steps, thinking somewhere in that range the flavor would find a place to pop. It didn't.


The Coil: The Aspire Bottom Vertical Coil (BVC) survived one tank, and died quickly in the second as I was taking down the airflow in the search for flavor. Cuban Perfecto gets mid-grade marks for performance. It is probably best in an RDA or RBA.

Notes: Make sure you give more time than normal for the blend to bed into the wicking material to avoid initial dry hits.


The Verdict: Cuban Perfecto is a loser for me. 4/10. I may revise the score when I try this juice after a 7-14 day steep.
 
Last edited:

vjc0628

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 23, 2013
3,082
5,834
Maryville TN
I havent tried the others to compare and thus couldnt answer... However, I would recommend adding Confederate to your order if you like Perique (and even if you dont ;)).. It is in my top 3, along with Top Leaf and Nomad.

Great I was going to say too late I ordered but they emailed me if I wanted another flav to sample for free
so Confederate it is
 

vjc0628

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 23, 2013
3,082
5,834
Maryville TN
I'm sorry, but your question got lost in the crashing waves and ebbing tides of the latest DIY homebrew discussions.

I have only sampled EtherVapes Vanilla Skye and it is very comparable to NET.com as far as tobacco impact. Vanilla Skye's Virginia leads followed by the creamy Cavendish and Vanilla. It is a sweet vape, but unlike a lighter liquid (HHV's Shadow, for example), the tobacco is unmistakable, but the vanilla is equally strong (which NET.com's Coventry or Quicknic's Godz'nilla were not) which is a plus. Many vanilla tobaccos... the vanilla is very faint, but Ethervapes got it right... for my tastes.

Comparing Vanilla Skye to HHV's Shadow: EtherVapes is more "raw" and bold in flavor, while HHV is lighter [tobacco impact] and more refined flavor wise.

If you like NET.com, then try Ethervapes -- you might find something you enjoy.

Great I am excited
 

NotSoMini

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
Jul 13, 2014
3,367
13,654
This is a copy and paste of a review I posted on the EV forum:

My reviews are not eloquent as many of you nor have I have been a pipe/cigar smoker however here are my thoughts about EV Confederate. From EV’s website: "Virginia tobaccos spiced with Louisiana Perique and to smooth it out a hint of Black Cavendish. This is a more robust and stronger flavored Tobacco. It is Southern style Tobacco at its best.” I’ve had Virginia and Black Cavendish tobaccos and I was most curious to try Perique so I asked Vash for a small sample. Instead he sent 12 mls – thanks Vash – with his comment that he felt I would like it. Right he was. The Virginia is not overly sweet (I don’t care for very sweet eliquids) and was perfect. The one tobacco that I did not recognize I knew was the Perique being this is the first for me. It was nothing that I expected although I was not quite sure what to expect and found it to be easy to vape. The combination of the various tobaccos and a little smokiness with a iittle sweetness makes Confederate an ADV for me. This is not an in-your-face NET and instead has enough flavor intensity in a nice way so as not to be so subtle. I will definitely reorder this the next time I place an order. Good job EV!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread