Natural Tobaccos - Part Deux

Status
Not open for further replies.

MikeNice81

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Feb 24, 2014
3,497
5,468
NC
Thanks for this^^^

When when BJ was trying Maple Wildwood, it spurred me to start my Window Extraction of ~1/4-1/2 oz of the Milan Old Dominion. After 43 days, I'll be doing my filtering and reduction tomorrow, I figured it would be a good Autumn vape. I'll also be completing my Captain Black (White pouch) and Milan Celebration, also a 43 day maceration.

I gave Celebration a 36 or 37 day steep before filtering it at 3 microns. My early 100% PG sample mix was pretty good at a week out. My first impression of the smell was, the best vanilla cake you'll never eat. The taste is definitely a complex blend of vanilla, rum, and other flavored cavendish. I'm thinking some of them are black cavendish. The taste is pretty darn satisfying and enjoyable. It tastes like they custom mixed some Ataldis (Sutliffe) bulk tobaccos, so the quality isn't quite as high as Drew Estate in my opinion. However, it is a good vape that is definitely long session worthy.
 

Brobdingnagian

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 18, 2011
485
1,106
Tampa Bay Area, FL
Nice! I have a whole bunch of NET juices, I could probably spare a couple for trade of your Telecaster. ;)

I know you're joking, Jerms. There's no possible way you could have that much juice to send anyone. We're talking liters upon liters.

If you're not joking and are serious, send some my way. :D

Like I've said before: donations always accepted. :w00t:

I don't really have anything to trade with, but I promise that any items/proceeds will go directly back into vaping....

...or living expenses... :shock:

You can't forget about those when you're ordering vaping equipment/liquids or it comes back to bite you. :facepalm:

(hey, come on now, I try to budget, but buying e-juice is like buying stock or BTC when it was about to spike up... except you invest now and hope that your investment causes you to return to said vendor...but you know, discounts can help, if you've got the right timing for them. If you're ready to check out or bounce check, the decision is obvious :p)

If I could afford to get all of the NETs I wanted to or could get in smaller bottles, or just one of them in a large quantity?

Hmm.... Now...that's a problem I can ponder happily! :)


ANYHOW, back to business:

I just loaded up the Magma (resistance shifted a bit to 1.6Ω from 1.5) with some of MFToms' Nat Sherman 1930.

Smooth, golden notes. Almost a silky smoothness to the vapor, age and 'oiliness' coming through a bit on the exhale, somewhere in the middle of the TH and the initial flavor (Which is almost as smooth as...did I mention the other one? I might have forgotten; I'll mention it again up ahead) so there's the definite cigar flavor going on, definitely a light-leafed wrapper, couldn't tell you which because I haven't had a leaf-wrapped cigar since the days I was playing poker after work got out at 3am. :2cool:

Very expansive, smooth vapor; "luxurious" is the word I'm looking for here. I can't really explain it any better than that, in words, but it is far surpassing (and beginning to suppress) the memories of cigars I used to enjoy on New Years' eve celebrations. Definitely on the opposite end of the spectrum from, say, Opulence 3 or Nub Cameroon, IMO.

It's closer to the Padron 1926 I received, with the overall character being brighter and mellower (but still with that "leaf presence" you can taste in cigar vapes) compared to the rich and smooth flavor in the Padron, which is definitely a dark wrapper ( think it's Maduro. I'll need to double-check) with not as much 'punch' as you'd expect a darker liquid to pack to your coils/wick, with the flavor and presence of the cigar intact.

I mean, the Padron, Opulence 3, and Black Gold are very dark, but they don't clog wicks/coils like they look like they should.

Groovy Blue (lighter in color) Nub Cameroon (somewhere inbetween light and dark colored), Black Gold (definitely dark), and Padron (a bit lighter than Black Gold) have yet to be used in the Magma. I mean, I did put some of the Padron in there because I wanted to see how it came out, and though it was good... I think it'll be much better on a fresh wick than it was when I initially tried it in the KFL (defunct now) and Magma (which was about due for a re-wicking at the time).

I will note that I was actually holding out on even vaping the Nat Sherman 1930 since it's a small bottle, and I didn't have a decent RDA/RBA to test it on. All are mixed to 18mg (I've stepped down to 15 on the magma, not really noticing using a few puffs of 18mg making any difference, though). I get equivalent mileage across the board with MFT's liquids.

Imagine a day when you can just walk into a cigar shop and buy some NET liquid right off the shelf....:?:

Just my :2c:, because this is probably a long post at this point, I'm wrapping it up here.
 
Last edited:

Jerms

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 1, 2011
9,252
25,832
Fargo
I was waiting for your review to see if it was similar to what I was thinking. Yep, it was. They are real quality liquids with outstanding tobacco tastes. However, at a buck a mil, I can't see paying that. Especially since there are others out there with outstanding tobacco's at half the price. Now if the price was brought down, I would buy enough to stock up as I can vape Cowboy all day without getting sick of it. Just not at that price.
I'm vaping Cowboy now and see why you're taken by it. The Burley is dominant, and better than most Burleys I've had. Full flavored and complex, and a little unique. Very much an analog cig feel with this NET. Very good, but not $30 for 30ml good. One of the top cig NETs I've had though.
 

MikeNice81

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Feb 24, 2014
3,497
5,468
NC
Brob, The Nat Sherman sports a Connecticut wrapper. It is definitely a lighter and more golden taste than the Opulence which sports a San Andres Wrapper and the Nub which sports a Cameroon wrapper. The Cameroon is one of my favorite wrappers when teamed with the right blend. The Nat Sherman is definitely a smooth operator though. I remember comparing it to something I would smoke at 3am after doing live sound in a club all night. It made me consider extracting my own Nat Sherman or a Connecticut wrapped cigar of some sort. Maybe I'll go with a Room 101 Connecticut.

Unfortunately my Padron and Nat Sherman both bit the dust after being stored in a box that took out a few other juices. Most sadly, my Opulence and Sangria both took big hits as well. They didn't go toes up like the rest of the juices, but they went flat. The Sangria is basicly tasting like a straight cav/bur and the Opulence 3 is tasting flat with very little detail. Fortunately I pulled them out a bit sooner and put them in my "current rotation" box.
 
Last edited:

MikeNice81

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Feb 24, 2014
3,497
5,468
NC
I went back and checked. I had the 1930 confused with another Sherman product. The 1930 is the one I called a great example of a fine Dominican profile. The wrapper is actually a Dominican "natural" wrapper I believe. Still it is a much more "laid back" varietal than the Cameroon or San Andres.

Either way it is a top notch stick for extracting and a great vape. The 3am reference was still correct.
 

Brobdingnagian

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 18, 2011
485
1,106
Tampa Bay Area, FL
Brob, The Nat Sherman sports a Connecticut wrapper. It is definitely a lighter and more golden taste than the Opulence which sports a San Andres Wrapper and the Nub which sports a Cameroon wrapper. The Cameroon is one of my favorite wrappers when teamed with the right blend. The Nat Sherman is definitely a smooth operator though. I remember comparing it to something I would smoke at 3am after doing live sound in a club all night. It made me consider extracting my own Nat Sherman or a Connecticut wrapped cigar of some sort. Maybe I'll go with a Room 101 Connecticut.

Unfortunately my Padron and Nat Sherman both bit the dust after being stored in a box that took out a few other juices. Most sadly, my Opulence and Sangria both took big hits as well. They didn't go toes up like the rest of the juices, but they went flat. The Sangria is basicly tasting like a straight cav/bur and the Opulence 3 is tasting flat with very little detail. Fortunately I pulled them out a bit sooner and put them in my "current rotation" box.

Sorry to hear that, man.

I think that (and this is just my opinion) "steeping" is the 'exchange' of flavor from the extract to the actual end product. Sort of how like you'd brew tea, but instead of just drinking it off the bat, you make a super-concentrated tea that you only need to fill the container 25% full to get to taste 100% like tea after addition of water.

Now, what's making juices "reverse steep"; I think this is oxidation, plain and simple.

Every time we open our juice bottles, more oxygen and nitrogen (and who knows what else in the air) get in there. This is bound to change the taste of any liquid; I've heard that fire-cured tobaccos can reverse-steep more quickly than non-fire-cured tobaccos (I don't know whether or not this is the case) but I'll assume that there's an added aroma from the fire-curing process that kinda off-gasses from the juice over time.

Personally, I find that Latakia has lost absolutely no bite or flavor change whatsoever. I'm vaping a lot of Blackberry Burley to see if the same holds true in that department. I'll actually add some FCB (7/20 mixdate on this sampler) to this cigar to see if I can detect it (I know, I know. Good cigar, yes. Good fire-cured Burley, yes. But it's tobacco, it likes to be blended :D) over the cigar. Wouldn't be surprised if I could, though.

However, I find all tobacco vapes to be relatively pleasant. I don't think you could come up with a combination that amazes me that often, but there are a lot of hidden gems out there, I know that much. I'm somewhere between a NETCom Sun-Cured Turkish and a Fire-cured Latakia in mood, right now. Stressed, but not frizzled enough to jump straight into the bag of punches that is Latakia (that's a lie, I'm just waiting for an excuse to vape some).

:sneaky:

EDIT: Forgot to add, I think that something like Raymond mentioned: an ultrasonic jewelry cleaner, would probably be the best way to 'quick-steep' a liquid. But remember, we're making tobacco tea from tobacco tea concentrate here; the rules change.

The longer a liquid is allowed to extract (and I couldn't even tell you how heat factors into the equation, but I will say that too much is probably a bad thing) the more flavor we're going to see. Proportionally, the more matter that ends up in the final maceration; the more we need to filter. Now, I don't know about you, but I think my coffee tastes pretty well like coffee when it runs through the pot rather than using a Keurig.

Were I to reduce said coffee into an extraction, it would probably gunk the hardiest filters; stain everything it gets on; turn all of my white socks brown; and fail to produce vapeable anything. If coffee exposed to air affects its flavor, the same is definitely true for tobacco. Anyone who has ever found an analog in a pack they "thought they lost" and found it to be remarkably stale and disgusting might see a similar pattern emerging.

Vacuum filtration might make all of this a lot easier on us, but it's not practical for home use expense-wise.

I think we should honestly approach tobacco extraction the same way as tea, to be honest. Heat the heck out of whatever you're using to extract it to boiling, add tobacco "tea" and agitate the heck out of it until it's cool. I would keep trying to get everything steeping, and then transfer it to a maceration storage vessel once its cooling process was complete. Then, make it sit. It's done nothing wrong, but it's tobacco; like tea, it needs time for all the flavors to transfer over.

Gut instinct tells me to just leave it alone and let it brew. Fill the container as much as you can without spilling or compromising the seal. I think air definitely has something to do with this. There's too many factors at play to discount the most simple and apparent ones.

I'm sure someone has already suggested/used this method or discussed it. Sorry if I'm being redundant and a little out-of-bounds, having not extracted any tobacco myself; I just feel that there are logical reasons for these sometimes illogical things going on with our blends.

Mostly everything I know about macerations and heat-extractions is from this thread, so I figured I would go ahead and pose the question with my statement. Would it make a difference? Has anyone tried this method and had positive results with the end-product's flavor retention/quality? Loss/gained nuances?

Now, since I don't know if it's been done, I am assuming what I suggested is somewhere between a heat-extraction and a cold maceration? How to get the best of both worlds....without compromising the juice....?

I vape everything fresh, usually. I have had some liquids turn flat with age and/or air exposure. One single flavor will stand out, the rest is 'meh'.

I don't know why all of this got me thinking so much about this.
 
Last edited:

MikeNice81

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Feb 24, 2014
3,497
5,468
NC
Brob, several people are trying a combination of heated and cold brewing. I gave my Room 101 and H&H eight hours of warm bathing and my Milan Celebration had two hours. Then I let them sit for about 35 days. I really can't tell a huge improvement between two and six hours. The low heat I used may be the reason.

Boomer on the other hand heats the PG to 150 degrees Fahrenheit before adding the tobacco and then stores it away. His comes out extremely potent. So, you may be on to something. Getting the air out of the equation is the hard part. Vacuum sealing isn't something most people can do or know how to do.

I also think the choice of solvent makes a difference. There are so many factors that it is hard to nail down exactly what is happening with each variable. I think my next extraction is going to include more heat on the beginning and more cold soak time. I'm thinking that Boomer may be on to something with his longer than average soak times. I'm not going to replicate his method exactly. However, I believe something similar with finer filtration will definitely give me something closer to my ideal extract.
 
Last edited:

boomerdude

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mike, have you tried Victor Sinclair's Connecticut Yankee? It's an Habano Connecticut wrapper with Dominican Fillers, spicy with a hint of coffee chocolate. It was one of my first extracts and I have since done a second longer steeped, stronger extract that fits the description to a tee.

Brob, The Nat Sherman sports a Connecticut wrapper. It is definitely a lighter and more golden taste than the Opulence which sports a San Andres Wrapper and the Nub which sports a Cameroon wrapper. The Cameroon is one of my favorite wrappers when teamed with the right blend. The Nat Sherman is definitely a smooth operator though. I remember comparing it to something I would smoke at 3am after doing live sound in a club all night. It made me consider extracting my own Nat Sherman or a Connecticut wrapped cigar of some sort. Maybe I'll go with a Room 101 Connecticut.

Unfortunately my Padron and Nat Sherman both bit the dust after being stored in a box that took out a few other juices. Most sadly, my Opulence and Sangria both took big hits as well. They didn't go toes up like the rest of the juices, but they went flat. The Sangria is basicly tasting like a straight cav/bur and the Opulence 3 is tasting flat with very little detail. Fortunately I pulled them out a bit sooner and put them in my "current rotation" box.
 

boomerdude

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
You pretty much describe the method I've been using for quite awhile now. Tried several different methods and the initial heat, cold extract works best for me. All the heat or shaking in the world is not going to equal time stewing as far as flavor goes. I may extract a clunker every once in awhile but I'm pretty sure it would be a clunker no matter how it's extracted. Some blends and especially cigars don't transfer well IMHO.

Sorry to hear that, man.

I think that (and this is just my opinion) "steeping" is the 'exchange' of flavor from the extract to the actual end product. Sort of how like you'd brew tea, but instead of just drinking it off the bat, you make a super-concentrated tea that you only need to fill the container 25% full to get to taste 100% like tea after addition of water.

Now, what's making juices "reverse steep"; I think this is oxidation, plain and simple.

Every time we open our juice bottles, more oxygen and nitrogen (and who knows what else in the air) get in there. This is bound to change the taste of any liquid; I've heard that fire-cured tobaccos can reverse-steep more quickly than non-fire-cured tobaccos (I don't know whether or not this is the case) but I'll assume that there's an added aroma from the fire-curing process that kinda off-gasses from the juice over time.

Personally, I find that Latakia has lost absolutely no bite or flavor change whatsoever. I'm vaping a lot of Blackberry Burley to see if the same holds true in that department. I'll actually add some FCB (7/20 mixdate on this sampler) to this cigar to see if I can detect it (I know, I know. Good cigar, yes. Good fire-cured Burley, yes. But it's tobacco, it likes to be blended :D) over the cigar. Wouldn't be surprised if I could, though.

However, I find all tobacco vapes to be relatively pleasant. I don't think you could come up with a combination that amazes me that often, but there are a lot of hidden gems out there, I know that much. I'm somewhere between a NETCom Sun-Cured Turkish and a Fire-cured Latakia in mood, right now. Stressed, but not frizzled enough to jump straight into the bag of punches that is Latakia (that's a lie, I'm just waiting for an excuse to vape some).

:sneaky:

EDIT: Forgot to add, I think that something like Raymond mentioned: an ultrasonic jewelry cleaner, would probably be the best way to 'quick-steep' a liquid. But remember, we're making tobacco tea from tobacco tea concentrate here; the rules change.

The longer a liquid is allowed to extract (and I couldn't even tell you how heat factors into the equation, but I will say that too much is probably a bad thing) the more flavor we're going to see. Proportionally, the more matter that ends up in the final maceration; the more we need to filter. Now, I don't know about you, but I think my coffee tastes pretty well like coffee when it runs through the pot rather than using a Keurig.

Were I to reduce said coffee into an extraction, it would probably gunk the hardiest filters; stain everything it gets on; turn all of my white socks brown; and fail to produce vapeable anything. If coffee exposed to air affects its flavor, the same is definitely true for tobacco. Anyone who has ever found an analog in a pack they "thought they lost" and found it to be remarkably stale and disgusting might see a similar pattern emerging.

Vacuum filtration might make all of this a lot easier on us, but it's not practical for home use expense-wise.

I think we should honestly approach tobacco extraction the same way as tea, to be honest. Heat the heck out of whatever you're using to extract it to boiling, add tobacco "tea" and agitate the heck out of it until it's cool. I would keep trying to get everything steeping, and then transfer it to a maceration storage vessel once its cooling process was complete. Then, make it sit. It's done nothing wrong, but it's tobacco; like tea, it needs time for all the flavors to transfer over.

Gut instinct tells me to just leave it alone and let it brew. Fill the container as much as you can without spilling or compromising the seal. I think air definitely has something to do with this. There's too many factors at play to discount the most simple and apparent ones.

I'm sure someone has already suggested/used this method or discussed it. Sorry if I'm being redundant and a little out-of-bounds, having not extracted any tobacco myself; I just feel that there are logical reasons for these sometimes illogical things going on with our blends.

Mostly everything I know about macerations and heat-extractions is from this thread, so I figured I would go ahead and pose the question with my statement. Would it make a difference? Has anyone tried this method and had positive results with the end-product's flavor retention/quality? Loss/gained nuances?

Now, since I don't know if it's been done, I am assuming what I suggested is somewhere between a heat-extraction and a cold maceration? How to get the best of both worlds....without compromising the juice....?

I vape everything fresh, usually. I have had some liquids turn flat with age and/or air exposure. One single flavor will stand out, the rest is 'meh'.

I don't know why all of this got me thinking so much about this.
 

boomerdude

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
I use Parafilm to cover my extract containers. Not a vacuum seal, but once it's on nothing is getting in or out. I'm happy with the filters that came with my Aeropress. No floaters, but I'm sure there are more particulates than if I used a smaller micron size.

Another thing I discovered is that there's a flavor change the longer an extract sits, just like a steeping juice. Plays hell trying to figure out the sweet spot. Cigars do this more than pipe tobacco.



Brob, several people are trying a combination of heated and cold brewing. I gave my Room 101 and H&H eight hours of warm bathing and my Milan Celebration had two hours. Then I let them sit for about 35 days. I really can't tell a huge improvement between two and six hours. The low heat I used may be the reason.

Boomer on the other hand heats the PG to 150 degrees Fahrenheit before adding the tobacco and then stores it away. His comes out extremely potent. So, you may be on to something. Getting the air out of the equation is the hard part. Vacuum sealing isn't something most people can do or know how to do.

I also think the choice of solvent makes a difference. There are so many factors that it is hard to nail down exactly what is happening with each variable. I think my next extraction is going to include more heat on the beginning and more cold soak time. I'm thinking that Boomer may be on to something with his longer than average soak times. I'm not going to replicate his method exactly. However, I believe something similar with finer filtration will definitely give me something closer to my ideal extract.
 

Brobdingnagian

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 18, 2011
485
1,106
Tampa Bay Area, FL
Brob, several people are trying a combination of heated and cold brewing. I gave my Room 101 and H&H eight hours of warm bathing and my Milan Celebration had two hours. Then I let them sit for about 35 days. I really can't tell a huge improvement between two and six hours. The low heat I used may be the reason.

Boomer on the other hand heats the PG to 150 degrees Fahrenheit before adding the tobacco and then stores it away. His comes out extremely potent. So, you may be on to something. Getting the air out of the equation is the hard part. Vacuum sealing isn't something most people can do or know how to do.

I also think the choice of solvent makes a difference. There are so many factors that it is hard to nail down exactly what is happening with each variable. I think my next extraction is going to include more heat on the beginning and more cold soak time. I'm thinking that Boomer may be on to something with his longer than average soak times. I'm not going to replicate his method exactly. However, I believe something similar with finer filtration will definitely give me something closer to my ideal extract.

You know, when you said that about vacuum-sealing I couldn't help but think of using a hot water bath like one would do in the process of making jam. I haven't really made jam/preserves in a while, but I've never had a problem using the hot jar method to seal these puppies. You guys are using mason jars, right? That should make this a lot simpler.

Same method as described here:
Water-Bath Canning High-Acid Foods
 
Last edited:

MikeNice81

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Feb 24, 2014
3,497
5,468
NC
Mike, have you tried Victor Sinclair's Connecticut Yankee? It's an Habano Connecticut wrapper with Dominican Fillers, spicy with a hint of coffee chocolate. It was one of my first extracts and I have since done a second longer steeped, stronger extract that fits the description to a tee.

I haven't tried it yet. I got a couple of generous boxes of juice about the time I got the last batch of extracts you sent. SO, I haven't tried them. It may or not be in that batch. It sounds very interesting though. If it isn't in that batch, I'll look into it.
 

Vicman

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 6, 2014
753
2,181
Chicago
Broke into my NET.com order today and have to take back something I previously said. I said they were kind of bland right out of the mail, which my last order was until it steeped for a couple weeks. However, this order is kinda blowing my mind at the moment with how much flavor I am getting and they are only a week old. I ordered the French cig sampler and Smoked Leaf. I gotta say that each one of these is blended perfectly. Will talk about them after spending more time with them. So glad I went with the French cig pack as I wanted to (and still do) try some of the other offerings. It was the wording of the descriptions which sold me. Whoever wrote them did a masterful job as I was salivating when reading them :p
 

Jerms

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 1, 2011
9,252
25,832
Fargo
First vape of RBFS's Dark Honey Berry tonight; a Green River Black Cavendish with honey and "a tart berry essence". Flavor is pretty spot on as described on the site. Like Caven Fever, the black cav doesn't have any of those funky notes that usually turn me off from tobacco processed that way. The berry is very subtle, but plays a rope.

As all Fog Sauces for me, it's extremely vapable. Solid flavor, no off notes. Time will tell how much I get into it. I'm not as immediately taken to it as some of the other new ones, but like with Pirate's that doesn't mean I won't be later.
 

Dusty_D

Original Guru
Senior Moderator
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 22, 2010
16,228
47,678
53
Toronto, Canada
dustysfoodieadventures.blogspot.ca
You know I envy the fact that you get to spend time at BBQ's right?!

I've been busy with home stuff, making Tomato Sauce for the year etc etc and also trying out the 5 Davidoff NETs from MVJ. Nothing much to say about those. They are good, but no stand-outs for me from the few that I've already tested (Royalty, Scottish, Danish and Flake Medallions). The Royalty was the best of the bunch so far. Still have to hit the English Mixture.
 

Jerms

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 1, 2011
9,252
25,832
Fargo
:offtopic: :2c: when I left Friday to officiate at the 4th largest BBQ Bash in the mid-west in Wildwood Missouri we where on page 945 of the thread.
I'm back today and thought I'd need to catch up on a half dozen pages, but I see we are still on page 945.
Where di everyone go?
Must have been at the BBQ also..... :laugh:
I was enjoying the Indian summer this weekend. Beeeautiful out. Gotta get my kicks before the inevitable 6 months of winter.
 

MFToms59

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 19, 2012
1,547
3,842
Nevada
:offtopic: :2c: when I left Friday to officiate at the 4th largest BBQ Bash in the mid-west in Wildwood Missouri we where on page 945 of the thread... Where di everyone go? ..... :laugh:

This VVVV
When when BJ was trying Maple Wildwood, it spurred me to start my Window Extraction of ~1/4-1/2 oz of the Milan Old Dominion. After 43 days, I'll be doing my filtering and reduction tomorrow, I figured it would be a good Autumn Vape. I'll also be completing my Captain Black (White pouch) and Milan Celebration, also a 43 day maceration...

I loaded the Capt. Black in one of my Grand's, after a 24 hour steep of a 10ml bottle; Wowsa... good hearty Pipe Tobacco flavor, really enjoyable. I did a few tweaks to the maceration; I used Potato Vodka, extra steep time and filtered 3xs with doubled Coffee Filters only. All extracts were heat reduced/ concentrated by 75%, than mixed with an equal amount of VG for my NET Flavor Base, my final vape juice was mixed @20% extract, VG & NIC. Base.
 

luceblueboy

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 7, 2010
1,345
1,955
37
Ohio
Just another reason Diane at My Vape Juice is the best ever!! She sent me the entire line of pipe tobacco extracts!!

IMG_0170.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread