The term "aromatic" can be used to denote
tobacco that has added flavorings to the leafs themselves like a cherry tobacco, or it can just refer to tobaccos that are blended to have a more robust room note or flavor. Non-aromatics provide less "flavor" and more earthy
tastes like hay, grass, spice or woodsy notes.
Honestly, the term itself is not
necessarily upheld by all tobacco lovers and manufacturers to refer to a specific type of thing. The way Ahlusion uses the term for their e-juice, is not totally in line with actual tobaccos but it adds distinction between their two lines. Here is what Ahlusion says:
"
What is an aromatic blend? Generally (not necessarily in the vaping world), aromatic tobacco blends are those which give off a distinct, complex and more robust aroma and room note, like in various moist pipe blends. This is mainly due to added flavoring. When it comes to our natural aromatic blends (in our Premium line), we've captured those specific flavors and aromas derived (mainly) from our Burleys, Virginias, Perique and Latakia blends.
Non-aromatic blends can be in anything from cigarettes, to pipes; traditionally non-aromatic blends can consist of any blend of tobaccos, but they usually lack that distinct aroma and flavor; most of the focus is on the pure natural flavors of the tobaccos used. For our non-aromatic blends we use milder Cavendish blends which are a bit sweeter and balanced with complementary flavors.
If you've only smoked cigarettes, it's almost impossible to convey the experience or difference of aromatic blends."
So, is Vita Bella considered an aromatic e-juice? Some may say yes because it is a tobacco (extract) that has added flavor, but some may say no due to the specific leaf used: (A single, non-flavoring added domestic tobacco). Maybe someone else can give you clarity from their perspective, but it will simply be a perspective, not necessarily law.