New design SLB DSE103 batteries and atomizers (and carts)?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ez Duzit

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
731
17
Southern California
1st just died :mad: Will change model to M401 to see if better quality.
Get the 401 manual version. Great vapor, good throat hit, really nice flavor, and the batteries last about 4-5 hours on a full charge. Sometimes a bit less if vaping really heavy.
Or are you just talking about using the 401 atty's with the 103 hardware?
 

Taelon

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2008
212
1
DE-Germany
Get the 401 manual version

No. Automatic µC control is mandatory to avoid overheat producing poisonous vapour. Manual systems are dangerous to health and should be avoided.

I concur on the 401...
can the 103 parts be used w/ 401?

No. And I haven't claimed that anywhere.
 
Last edited:

Ez Duzit

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
731
17
Southern California
No. Automatic µC control is mandatory to avoid overheat producing poisonous vapour. Manual systems are dangerous to health and should be avoided.
Not even sure how to respond to that, it's so far fetched. If you're going to make an off the wall statement like that, I hope you can back it up. Links to articles, or data, or anything that would give credence to such an outrageous claim.
 

Ez Duzit

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
731
17
Southern California
If your going to make claims like that, you need to provide some links that will back it up. Saying, "go do a search", (which you edited out), well, that just isn't gonna cut it. You can't make a claim like that. and then get off the hook so easy.

If you have any links to back this up, please just post them, and put all doubt to rest. But if you can't post at least one or more links, I suggest you refrain from making those types of remarks.

I'm trying to be nice here, but since you are the one who made the claim, the burden of proof lies with you. I truly want to see if there's any validity to this, but I think I already know the answer.
 
Last edited:

Taelon

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Dec 20, 2008
212
1
DE-Germany
I'm trying to be nice here,

Then You may want to respect the thread's topic and open another discussion thread. This is off-topic here, Sir.

And, as I've said in the old discussion (maybe deleted for critics on Janty), request for evidence for my claim is unserious since e-cigarette manufacturers keep their specs proprietary and closed as all the rebranding sellers do.

So manual systems manufacturers have to prove my claim wrong, not me.

Or should we ask the FDA?
 
Last edited:

Ez Duzit

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 16, 2009
731
17
Southern California
Off topic??? WTF is wrong with you? YOU BROUGHT IT UP!
If you are going to make a statement on this forum like "manual switch e-cigs are dangerous to your health and should be avoided" YOU DAM WELL BETTER BE ABLE TO BACK IT UP WITH SOME FACTS. You come up with some ridicules search criteria that yields no results, then have the balls to say it's off topic when you started it. You claim to know all these things, but can't come up with even an ounce of facts to back up your crazy claims, other then your say so. Let me get this right. We're supposed to take your word for this?? Well, I hate to break it to you, but that leaves you with zero credibility.

You made similar claims in another thread (http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/product-feature-design-requests/4887-manual-switch-901-a.html ), and after being asked in a very polite way, to please explain, again you wouldn't, and eventually got labeled as nuts by several members.

Nobody wants to hear you spout your mumbo jumbo cryptic techno babble bull crap. BUT, if you could actually back it up, I promise you, people would line up to listen. Since you can't back it up, please stop making outrageous claims that can't be substantiated. They are harmful to our cause.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread