Well, if only I had looked for a VaporNine forum earlier, I wouldn't have had to bug you with emails today, Ben. My questions were all answered right here.
Thanks again for your help. I placed my order and can't wait to try these!
you're right about the resistance but wouldn't a thinner wire heat quicker? Like a light bulb filament opposed to a metal rod?
~Jo~ classic rookie mistake. Always check forums first! haha j/k. Its good to hear it straight from the horses mouth sometimes, so to speak.
I have around 50 of these cartos on their way to my door step, I am a big supporterI love em and they are my daily use now, in fact my 901 and other cartos get no love anymore, I kinda feel bad for them. *caresses 901* "We had a great start, but its me, not you. Ok its actually neither of us, its Ben's fault"
![]()
It's very surprising that I got any dates at all in high school...![]()
Besides, you look *just like* Hugh Laurie.![]()
![]()
Why thank you! But some folks thought I looked better back in my longer hair, ginger, cross-dressing days....
![]()
8-o
Sorry for the delay in responding to this... I was busy bashing my head against the keyboard...![]()
I was doing some analysis on your new cartos earlier tonight while doing a "thinking out loud" discussion with one of the forum senior members and "experts". These cartos are one of the rare examples of how one can actually get increased apparent performance (vapor production with flavor) without using the knee-jerk big-hammer method of dropping the resistance in order to generate more wattage.
If a cartomizer or atomizer is working at a nice balance, the outer body of the unit won't actually get very warm at all. Any heat transferred to the outer shell is.. well.. wasted heat. These cartos appear to have a very nice equational "balance".
Sorry for the delay in responding to this... I was busy bashing my head against the keyboard...
While you have a valid point... the thermal "mass" or thermal capacitance that we're talking about here... in comparison to the other factors like wattage, convection cooling, conduction cooling.. etc.. etc.. is so small that the transient response (heating up from an ambient temperature) isn't really a significant factor.
I was doing some analysis on your new cartos earlier tonight while doing a "thinking out loud" discussion with one of the forum senior members and "experts". These cartos are one of the rare examples of how one can actually get increased apparent performance (vapor production with flavor) without using the knee-jerk big-hammer method of dropping the resistance in order to generate more wattage. In a super-geek kinda way, it's an interesting equation that balances heating with cooling. Heating obviously from the power delivered to the coil.. and cooling from the airflow, conduction to the liquid, and the actual act of vaporizing a volume of liquid. If a cartomizer or atomizer is working at a nice balance, the outer body of the unit won't actually get very warm at all. Any heat transferred to the outer shell is.. well.. wasted heat. These cartos appear to have a very nice equational "balance".
It's very surprising that I got any dates at all in high school...![]()
i personally don't like these at 5V; they do, however, improve the 3.7V experience over standard cartos, gmav44. so if it's a voltage issue you're thinking of, keep that in mind.
can someone please post the link on vapornine web site which carto you folks are talking about so i can order the correct one. So most of you folks like these new cartos and they are good at 3.7v? Thanks a million.