Got one in the mail, did ya lead-foot?![]()
Kinda sounds like it. Doesn't it? And he thought just not washing the car tag would fool them.
Last edited:
Got one in the mail, did ya lead-foot?![]()
Hey wiseguy,,,, don't let me come over there, I know where you live...![]()
Feel like you been left out to dry?![]()
LOL, it wouldn't be the first time Rocket.
Dave has a way of just "clamming-up" at the right moment.
He's "Watching TV, and checking back once in awhile..."
He's really enjoying this thread, though....
breakthru, isn't that circuit limited to 6 amp through the switch?
Inductor switching current might be much higher than output current.
I think it is somewhat related to I(output max)= I(switch max) X (V(in/Vout).
Wouldn't that circuit be limited to about 3.75 amp @ 6 volts with 3.7 volts in
(with optimum L and C)?
Switching losses at higher frequencies affect efficiency significantly.
I was initially surprised by the increase in loss I saw on the bench as switching frequency went up. At one point, I wanted to build a booster with a very small inductor. I saw efficiency go down the toilet when switching frequencies got into the MHz. I've found the ideal frequency to be around 600KHz. Much higher and you sacrifice too much efficiency. Much lower and things start getting too big. We're talking about a buck converter here not boost, but I imagine you'd see the same thing since the only difference between them is the placement of the inductor, rectifier, and switch.
Buck and Boost both suffer switching losses, that's why the commercial devices are all around the 600kHz range, it seems to be the "sweet spot". I tend to lean towards the 300kHz range for higher efficiency still and remain in the .50 x .75 pcb area.