North Dakota Petitions to be presented tomorrow

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
This thread has been discussing this petition since June: http://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/fo...uld-ban-smoking-e-cig-use-all-workplaces.html

We already know what's in them. https://docs.google.com/file/d/13MS0REmSFm8_SAf_L12qFd2f_R_aYljXYdq3X3lJGQyz6qJ5K6jCuCqz9dny/edit

They used the model legislation being pedaled by Stanton Glantz's Americans for Non-smokers Rights that tells a bunch of lies about e-cigarettes and gives suggested wording for revising state law to roll e-cigarettes into smoke-free legislation. The only way we can fight this thing is by word of mouth and trying to get into the media.

There was nobody to write to, visit, or call because this was not being proposed by lawmakers. We had no way of stopping the Smoke Free North Dakota committee from gathering signatures on the petitions.

What we do have tomorrow is a PR opportunity. If a large group of vapers were to show up at their press conference, it might throw them a curve and hopefully steal their thunder:

Members of the Smoke Free North Dakota committee plan on turning in signatures at the North Dakota Secretary of State’s office at 9:40 a.m. Thursday. At 10 a.m. the group will hold a press conference in the judicial wing atrium of the state Capitol to discuss the ballot measure. The group needed to have at least 13,452 signatures.
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
On Smoke-Free North Dakota's facebook page (Smoke-Free North Dakota | Facebook) they posted a link to an ASH article and then commented:

This article was posted to reference that some countries have entirely banned e-cigarettes. This measure proposes limiting where you can use e-cigarettes as they have not been proven safe in any rebuttable peer-reviewed research to date. If e-cigs are proven safe and effective they can be used outside of public indoor places where they have created confusion.

Several of us have posted comments that have been removed. I posted several comments, each with a link to an article that appeared in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, with nothing but a short description of the researcher's findings. Nothing critical was said about SFND -- in fact nothing at all was said about or to SFND. Nevertheless they removed them all.
 

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
67
Interestingly, the CDC gave a Community Transformation grant to the ND Health Dept, and "Work will target tobacco-free living" is included in the grant's stated purpose
CDC - States and Communities ? Program Descriptions - Community Transformation Grants

The North Dakota Department of Health is receiving a $370,684 planning award to build capacity to support healthy lifestyles in the entire state of North Dakota, an estimated population of over 640,000 including a rural population of 330,000. Work will target tobacco-free living, active living and healthy eating, quality clinical and other preventive services, healthy and safe physical environments, and social and emotional wellness.

If the ND Health Dept has (as I strongly suspect) funded Smoke-Free North Dakota, e-cigarette advocates would be wise to expose this to the ND news media.

Since a majority of voters in ND oppose Obama, ND voters may not be pleased to find out that Obama appointees at CDC (via the ND Health Dept) have been funding the ballot initiative campaign to ban smoking and e-cig use.
 
Last edited:

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
On the SFND facebook page, they posted a link to an ASH article with this comment: "This measure proposes limiting where you can use e-cigarettes as they have not been proven safe in any rebuttable peer-reviewed research to date." Under that post I gave them links to several articles published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Without adding any editorializing whatsoever, I posted several responses that merely gave a link to an article that had been published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and a one- or two-sentence synopsis of the content.

All of these were deleted. Apparently they were not really interested in rebutting.
 

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
67

CapitalPuff

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 6, 2011
146
90
Lansing, MI
Illinois has a ban on smoking in public buildings of any kind and you can not smoke on any school grounds. So I am used to that. I do not vape anywhere you can not smoke. Good luck with everything...It is not so bad and you get used to it.

But you are not smoking... Used to it or not, we can't just roll over as we did when we were smokers.
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
Illinois has a ban on smoking in public buildings of any kind and you can not smoke on any school grounds. So I am used to that. I do not vape anywhere you can not smoke. Good luck with everything...It is not so bad and you get used to it.
When you roll over that easy, they rev the engine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread