Okay, so it is mainly an argument with respect to second-hand-smoke?
I will admit to being mostly clueless when it comes to the science behind that subject.
I do agree that we can frame our argument in ways that avoid such references.
Using such references is an attempt to use their own lie against them.
Which is basically confirming their lie.
I will admit to being mostly clueless when it comes to the science behind that subject.
I do agree that we can frame our argument in ways that avoid such references.
Using such references is an attempt to use their own lie against them.
Which is basically confirming their lie.