Ho no... we're we go again, with the MORAL judjement of the issue... it's like telling that if you drink 2 liters of non-alchoolic beer, you are a drunkard, because that think 'looks just like beer'... well, let me tell you this: when I was into vaping for about 2 months (a year ago

), were I work, I made the CO measurement test just out of curiosity (they had invited a couple of doctors for an anti-smoking counseling, and anyone who wished could make the test...) Well, it was right after lunch, and I had just had a 'smoke'... 'the perfect time for the test, then' said the doctor, with a smile... well, you should have seen her face, when she saw the normal values for a non-smoker on the display

. Only then did I explain about the e-cig, and my curiosity to know about the health benefits... and the reaction was TOTALLY supportive

. She knew about the e-cig, but had never seen one... even took note of the brand (It was a Janty Dura). Well, she was a doctor whose expertise area is tobbaco related problems, and she totally supported de e-cig, because, MORAL questions apart, she knows that it's not the nicotine wich is killing people... what kills people is the SMOKE (hence, 'smokers'...) I really can't understand some people (some doctors included); when presented with a smokeless alternative, still can't see the (obvious) benefits. To them, you're still a 'smoker' - even though you don't 'smoke' anymore...
