So Callie the T-Shirt printer sees the word manganese in a press release and declares the Panasonic an IMR?The panasonic cgr's (calliesKustom) are IMR and have been proven to be the best cells available without a doubt. The AW are also great batteries but are not as good as the callies.They are the only two cells i will use.
IMR has always referred to cells that are LiMn2O4, these Panasonics you claim as IMR are of a different chemistry... period.
Panasonic in their own literature only compares them to IMRs, saying "like the LiMn2O4".
http://www.pohl-electronic.de/pdf/Panasonic/CGR18650CH.pdf
Overpaying for Callie's generic re-wraps is silly BTW, the same cells can always be found at better prices.
As far as your 'proven best cell' claim let's take a look at this TrustFire.
If we use 3.3V as a vaping/loaded cut-off @ 3A the TF gets to 2100mAh. Looking at SuperT's lower 2.5A test the Panasonic only makes to 1800mAh.
So the TF at an additional 20% amp load, still manages to get 17% more mAh than the best battery.
As the kids would say, PWNED.
Lets look at them at 3V. Pretty much the same story. At the same additional amp disadvantage the TF manages about 15% more mAh than the 'best' Panasonic.
They may not be 3000mAh but they certainly do a fine job, even at 5A they still produce about the same ending mAh.
I have to salute forcedfuel50 for analyzing real data and not using a one-size-fits-all approach to his recommendations.
And as far as longevity if you were to peruse the specs sheets of some of larger players; Sanyo, Panasonic, Moli, Samsung etc. you'll note that at about as little as 110 full charge cycles performance starts to drop by about ~4% and continues to drop as the charge cycles add up.
Here's one more test, where the tester made a point of saying that his AW IMRs were about a year old and never abused vs new Panasonic high drains.
Compare this test to forcedfuel's I think it's obvious that time and use have taken a toll on the AWs.
Food for thought.