.
keep telling yourself that the people who disagree with you are a bunch of goofballs (or, in your words "high watt cloud chasers"). ad hominem is one way to deal with being on the wrong end of an argument.
that's a $40 item. do you really think Provape, with a device people are expecting to cost north of $250, will compete with that?
again, the people willing to pay upwards of $200 for a device are the same people who will at least want the option of going above 20 watts.
now, if you tell me the P3 will compare on price with the MVP, then you've got a winning argument.
speaking of a small audience, I wonder which is smaller--the number of people who want the option to vape above 20 watts or the number of people willing to pay $250 or more for a battery tube? I'm guessing the latter is quite smaller than the first.
.
Stubby said:...
It's a hoot reading post from high watt cloud chasers claiming they are the norm
...
keep telling yourself that the people who disagree with you are a bunch of goofballs (or, in your words "high watt cloud chasers"). ad hominem is one way to deal with being on the wrong end of an argument.
Stubby said:...
I don't have the numbers but I would guess the MVP 2.0 out sells everything and anything in the high watt market by many times.
....
that's a $40 item. do you really think Provape, with a device people are expecting to cost north of $250, will compete with that?
again, the people willing to pay upwards of $200 for a device are the same people who will at least want the option of going above 20 watts.
now, if you tell me the P3 will compare on price with the MVP, then you've got a winning argument.
speaking of a small audience, I wonder which is smaller--the number of people who want the option to vape above 20 watts or the number of people willing to pay $250 or more for a battery tube? I'm guessing the latter is quite smaller than the first.
.
