Prohibitionists post, health activists remove, false and misleading e-cigarette propaganda posters at U of Kentucky

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
67
Prohibitionists post, health activists remove, false and misleading e-cigarette propaganda posters at University of Kentucky
https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/539329_3907125310574_1847040116_n.jpg

The poster mentions tobacco-Free UK, which I couldn't find any information about in various searches.

But the poster cites as a reference the Hahn/Riker propaganda article "E-cigarettes: Promise or Peril" that was irresponsibly published earlier this year in a nursing journal.

Wonder who made and is posting these posters?

I encourage all health activists at University of Kentucky to tear down every poster that can be removed, and to cover over those that can't be removed.
 

Placebo Effect

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 19, 2008
1,444
1,562
As an alternative to defacing these posters and risking being barred from UK's campus, those in Lexington should work to get a student organization sympathetic to our cause (i.e., conservative or libertarian groups) to go through the red tape necessary to get permission to put up flyers countering the propaganda shown on the flyer.
 

VapApe

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 6, 2011
727
767
Ohio
You can just about make out the brand name on the e cig in the poster.

Some one should inform the University of Kentucky, That the vendor of that brand mite not be to happy seeing their brand being bashed like that. And they need to take them down just in case. To prevent a possible law suite.

I doubt that they could be sued . But if we could spin it as possibly it mite work.
 
Last edited:

Myk

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 1, 2009
4,889
10,658
IL, USA
You can just about make out the brand name on the e cig in the poster.

Some one should inform the University of Kentucky, That the vendor of that brand mite not be to happy seeing their brand being bashed like that. And they need to take them down just in case. To prevent a possible law suite.

I doubt that they could be sued . But if we could spin it as possibly it mite work.

I would be amazed if they wouldn't lose in such a lawsuit. Brand showed, false claims. To get any money may require a proof of losses but cease and desist should be pretty easy.
 

Placebo Effect

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 19, 2008
1,444
1,562
After looking at that poster again some things aren't adding up. Now does UK mean United Kingdom or University of Kentucky? The photo credit is to a guy in Las Vegas. This thing stinks on so many levels.

Yes, this is University of Kentucky.

The photo can essentially be used by anyone who isn't charging for it and gives credit to the photographer -- Electronic Cigarette Smoking | Flickr - Photo Sharing!
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran

jtpjc

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 8, 2010
1,521
2,291
Netherlands
But she's right in slide 29 that "Definitions are critical!!!" Even if hers is wrong:

“Smoking” means inhaling, exhaling, burning, or carrying any lighted or heated cigar, cigarette, or pipe, or any other lighted or heated tobacco or plant product intended for inhalation, in any manner or in any form. “Smoking” also includes the use of an e-cigarette which creates a vapor, in any manner or in any form, or the use of any oral smoking device for the purpose of circumventing the prohibition of smoking in this Article.”
 

Bill Godshall

Executive Director<br/> Smokefree Pennsylvania
ECF Veteran
Apr 2, 2009
5,171
13,288
67
Placebo Effect wrote

As an alternative to defacing these posters and risking being barred from UK's campus, those in Lexington should work to get a student organization sympathetic to our cause (i.e., conservative or libertarian groups) to go through the red tape necessary to get permission to put up flyers countering the propaganda shown on the flyer.

I'm not aware that political signs posted on public property (especially those posted without obtaining formal approval to do so) are protected by private property laws. Besides, ever since political signs began being posted on public property, opponents (many of whom subsequently became councilmen, commissioners, mayors and legislators) have been removing them. Its a long standing American political tradition.

I never obtained permission to post any of many signs I've posted throughout the University of Pittsburgh and the eastern neighborhoods of Pittsburgh during the past 30 years (as well as at the courthouse, city/county building and the state capitol). Folks who post political signs are concerned about being charged with defacing public property or littering (by putting up signs), and assume that they no longer own a flyer once its posted.

I've also removed many political signs (e.g. that promoted racism, the criminalization of abortion, the war on drugs and cigarette smoking).

Besides, I strongly doubt that any administrators at UK or its College of Nursing would take action against anyone who removed Hahn's signs (especially those taped, thumbtacked, stapled or attached to a stick in the ground), as long as no property was damaged (e.g. an enclosed display case containing a sign). In the latter case, I'd tape a sign over the display case saying "The poster under this is a lie".

I agree that concerned folks at UK should also expose and oppose (in the news media) Hahn's posters and her other false claims.

But seeking permission to posting a competing flyer next to Hahn's is like asking permission to post a "peace" sign next a swastika on public property.
 
Last edited:

VapApe

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 6, 2011
727
767
Ohio
Just throwing this out there. Could we start a group or post here on ECF to work on strategy's to counter the ANTZ.
Just taking a page from EH as it were

Call it the advocate team or A-TEAM.
Yes we do have CASAA but they have a very full plate as it is.

Many of us are not as well spoken as we would like to be.
To be able to have frame works and strategy's to look at would be a big help.
Be it letter writing or speaking in front of a city government.

I just love it when a plan come together;):vapor:
 

recidivus

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 20, 2012
1,331
693
Canada
www.youtube.com
Oh jeez. How many chemicals are used to treat that paper, the ink, the glues, etc. First thing I saw was that the ecig brand is visible (I'm not sure if it even is a brand, it's just the common No Entry symbol). Even IF these claims were true, the ecig itself is not the cause of any harm. Oh no! Dihydrogen monoxide is in the very air we breath! Something must be done to...

Bah I give up. Let em live in a bubble.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread