I'm not a Lawyer.
But to me, a "Inhalant Delivery System" is a piece of Hardware when it comes to e-Cigarettes.
Right. An "inhalant delivery system" is a piece of hardware, but the bill doesn't say "inhalant delivery system,
[period]." It says "inhalant delivery system,
product." An "inhalant-delivery-system
product" is a product
related to that piece of hardware. And a "
flavored inhalant-delivery-system product" is a
flavored product, related to the piece of hardware. And that "flavored product" is what would be prohibited by the bill, not the "inhalant delivery system" itself.
Otherwise, please show me an example of a piece of hardware that, by itself, you would classify as a "flavored inhalant delivery system." I suppose you
could also parse it as a "
flavored inhalant delivery system product" meaning "delivery-system product for a flavored inhalant" but, again, the inclusion of "flavored tobacco products" leads me to believe that's not what they meant, at all. They're trying to ban the
flavored products -- tobacco and inhalant-delivery-system alike -- not just the products themselves. If you're going to include all vaporizers in the ban as being "products capable of delivering flavored inhalants," then you also have to ban all pipes and rolling papers too, as being "products capable of holding flavored tobacco."