lol yep, kind of a screwy situation right? I'm too lazy to do math on the reg so I'm thinking I'll usually just tell it 0mg target. It then gives me PG and VG values, and I'm thinking of just adding those two weights together.Just tell it 0mg base and 0mg target. Since you don't care. Will it accept that? Or will it just tell you to use 0ml of that and give you amounts of PG and VG to add?
EDIT: Since you're not shooting for any particular target, it might be best to simplify. Tell it your target is 0mg, 100%PG (and if it asks, tell it your flavorings are 100% PG as well). Then it will give you a recipe with only PG and flavorings. Use your premade nic base as the "PG" value, and add the flavorings in the appropriate amount.
...oh, I sort of forgot what thread this was, though. This will work for measuring amounts in ml, but since we're mixing by weight, you will need to convert it to grams by hand, since the weight per ml given for PG in the calculator will not match that of your mostly-VG nic base.90%VG, 6.4%PG and 3.6%nic (what you have if you made "90/10" with 36mg PG as the "10") is:
(.9 * 1.036) + (.064 * 1.261) + (.036 * 1.01) = 1.076734 g/ml
...scratch that...had my PG/VG values mixed up, and my nic math was off by a factor of 10...
90%VG, 9.64%PG and .36%nic:
(.9 * 1.261) + (.0964 * 1.036) + (.0036 * 1.01) = 1.2384064 g/ml
IE if I tell it I want 85% VG and I am using 5% flavorings, it will give me the weight for an additional 10% PG and 85% VG. If I add those together I'll have the weight of my 90/10 nicbase...(except the quick math test I did with a recipe yielded different results than when I honed it into be precise to my nicbase...but the difference was like .04mg

lmao...I doubt anybody else out there managed to do this nonsense to themselves
ETA I think I just realized what you mean...so all I need to do on any given recipe is taken whatever total of ML of base it is calling for and mulyiply it by 1.2384064 g/ml. I just did that and it came out exactly as ELR told me a recipe would be when I fidgeted enough to get it exact. That's awesome man. Thank you
Last edited: