For the Knife conversation, I can go with this. But I don't think I would Extend this to Atomizers.
Sure, 440C is a Good Choice for a Surgical Scalpel. It has a One Time Use. Can be made Sterile thru Passivation. Cost of Material or Manufacturing is Not Relevant. And the demands that will be Placed on the Blade are pretty much Defined and Narrow.
But can the Same thing can be Said for a Everyday Carry or a Kitchen Knife? Trade Offs might be made say for Sharpness for Corrosion Resistance. Durability/Flexibility for Hardness. Cost verses Lifespan.
The are a Lot of Factors that go into the Choice of a Blade Material for a EDC or a Kitchen Knife. And people/OEM's Don't always Prioritize them in the Same Way.
But what about an Atomizer? What is the Single Greatest Factor that goes into the Choice of a Metallic Alloy? I would think it would be that it Doesn't "Rust" of exhibited Corrosion/Decomposition while in contact with e-liquids.
Most (just about All) Stainless Steels with satisfy the Requirements of an Atomizer with regards to Physical Durability, Appearance, Fabrication, Cost, Electrical/Magnetic Properties, etc. But some Stainless Steels have Superior "Rust" and Corrosion properties.
So to me, those Stainless Steels would be considered the "Best".
I not sure I would call myself a Metallurgist. Because it wasn't a Primary area of Expertise. But I do have a Background in Physical Manufacturing. And although it was Not the my Main area of Instruction, I did teach Metallurgy Courses on the College level.
I guess Im, old school thinking my best and most used knives are a butcher knife made from a lief spring and a folding Henry pocket knife. also has a carbon blade in it. They are alot more easier to maintain an edge on I can shave hairs on my arm with both knives.