Senator/Canadian Government, might be right

[bbruiser]

I never would reply to a thread thats more than a month old let alone a year old. majority of the more refined members allready know this.

 

[TheBlueAdept]

I never would reply to a thread thats more than a month old let alone a year old. majority of the more refined members allready know this.

Well, it would appear that in a way at least, you just did.

I for one am happily unrefined.

 

[yanks21]

OP: you're a .....

I for one am happily unrefined.

Me, too

 

[DerekPGH]

me three. i usually just read the content and post my thoughts. why would i bother looking at the day it was posted, especially when it was on the front page of the sub forum?

 

[bbruiser]

me three. i usually just read the content and post my thoughts. why would i bother looking at the day it was posted, especially when it was on the front page of the sub forum?

Becuzz you aints refined!8-o

 

[bbruiser]

Well, it would appear that in a way at least, you just did.

I for one am happily unrefined.

Cyber bully!!!!!

 

[TheBlueAdept]

Cyber bully!!!!!

You just did it again!

 

[Thornbyrd]

Old thread or not- back on topic

I'll take my personal doctors opinion over some politician that was slotted into a role motivated by tax dollars and lobbyist for the big tobacco companies.

I have enough health problems w/o my cigarette addiction adding to them and when I switched to e-cigs my doctor was estatic. The amount of nicotine consumed through an e-cig was of no concern- the fact that I was off the 1001 other cancerous agents was.

In addition anyone smoking an analog if you think they haven't added additional chemicals to keep you addicted to their product your dreaming. Analogs of today vs. those made 50 years ago are far far more dangerous than we are led to believe.

So inconclusion, I'll trust my doctors and if they don't have a problem with it then the gov't can go stuff itself.

 

[DerekPGH]

I agree with thorn byrd. If nicotine was the only thing that was keeping me addicted, my first week or so on the e-cig wouldn't have been nearly as miserable as it was.

 

[Splattered]

the fact that I was off the 1001 other cancerous agents was.

Don't you mean 4001 But then who can be sure, some people say hundreds, others say thousands... those who withold the truth are never going to let that one be revealed!

I agree with thorn byrd. If nicotine was the only thing that was keeping me addicted, my first week or so on the e-cig wouldn't have been nearly as miserable as it was.

Touche... I found that in the first week or so as well.

And unrefined or not, I'm a n00b to this so despite the OP being almost a full year old I liked having a read of a few different approaches/opinions even if I do or don't agree

 

[M & M]

YOu got to love the trolls, but hey, I for one, enjoyed hearing from some of the vets I haven't seen or heard from for awhile.