Amazing how they "spin" that stuff Catt. "Net Neutrality" and "fast lane (big $$$$)" in same title.
At first, before reading it, the headline sounds as if they were making the net more neutral. Alas, quite the opposite.
They (Big business) is already responsible for upping everyone's NetFlix bill and/or reducing content. (for those that use NetFlix)
Oligarchy indeed.
I can sort of understand their position....that streaming services take up a lot of constant bandwidth. They aren't intermittent. But giving pay-extra-big-players a "separate but equal" "lane" is not the way to go, IMHO. Equality of access to bandwidth is important.
IDK. Maybe NetFlix likes the idea....if they "get something for their money" that they are forced (extorted?) to shell out.
At first, before reading it, the headline sounds as if they were making the net more neutral. Alas, quite the opposite.
They (Big business) is already responsible for upping everyone's NetFlix bill and/or reducing content. (for those that use NetFlix)
Oligarchy indeed.
I can sort of understand their position....that streaming services take up a lot of constant bandwidth. They aren't intermittent. But giving pay-extra-big-players a "separate but equal" "lane" is not the way to go, IMHO. Equality of access to bandwidth is important.
IDK. Maybe NetFlix likes the idea....if they "get something for their money" that they are forced (extorted?) to shell out.

