So - are we getting it or are we not - nicotine

Status
Not open for further replies.

TWISTED VICTOR

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Sep 14, 2009
3,461
67
61
The edge of Mayhem
Back on topic...I care less if I am getting any nicotine from e-cigs or not since it allowed me to leave analogs behind. For me, that is the bottom line. If anyone trying to quit analogs cannot do so with the e-cig, there is a series of videos by premier forum member Tropical Bob who shows how you can satisfy your nicotine cravings for pennies on the dollar. vaping, snus, nasal snuff and other nicotine sources are potential schemes you can use to kill your tobacco habit.

It's pretty well documented here that we're getting it, alright. Question is, and I think this is what Trogg is asking, why do some of us (not all), if we're really getting ample nic, still don't get satisfaction, feel edgy, lose focus, find it hard to experience the gammit of emotion we had as analog smokers. It's a long thread, rich in info that's pushing for a resolution by some pretty smart people (excluding myself:)) and in the end, well, I think Trogg may have his answer. As to the other methods, that's a good point, but that also makes it obvious that it isn't just the nic that some of us are addicted to. Definitely worth a full read. ;)
 

Vaporer

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 23, 2009
1,767
22
Away..
breakfastchef,
Yea, a few pages back it says everyones toolkit may not look alike.
The idea is to be off the analogs, reduce, quit find your destiny without analogs.
TB has been a plethora of info in these areas.

Twisted,
It would be nice for ecigs to fall into a new catagory or recreational usage devices.
The FDA's NRT's keep the level of nic alone so low they are prone to failure. They all seem to start off maybe ok, but fail miserably with time.

This forum is a great place. Support, openness, many skilled levels and actual real down to earth people. As a whole, you don't see slamming, ridicule for failure....just people wanting answers and many willing to help. I was amazed to read th recent ecig testing done allowed 16mg liquid. Most would have expected 4mg. Maybe they actually learned something reading here.
 

exogenesis

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 1, 2009
877
16
UK
Great stuff DVap,

Your quantification of alkaloids by titration showing pretty much
all alkaloids and only alkaloids in the extract is a significant relief,
wasn't sure what else could have been in there :)
(TSNAs not-withstanding)

Wish the movers & shakers of the global industry did read this forum
(maybe they do), cos they'd certainly get a better perspective
of the real need/demand/true-safety effectors that exist, rather
than the carry-on-in the-same-old-way attitiude that ended us up
with smoking-cessation containing only nicotine.
 
Last edited:

Kurt

Quantum Vapyre
ECF Veteran
Sep 16, 2009
3,433
3,607
Philadelphia
Anyhow they (RJRT and the Goberment FDA) tested the Eclipse and the harm profile, if used correctly, was reduced by an estimated 70%.

So let me get this straight. RJRT creates a heating-tobacco cigarette, the Eclipse (Eclipse - Tobacco Products), which depending on how it is used can still burn tobacco, although 70-90% less than an analog. FDA says sure, no problem, its certainly safer than an anaolg, go ahead RJRT!! The smoke from these, although less than an anolog, is still burning tobbacco smoke!

And they are having a fit over PVs, which burn nothing and do not have the carcinogenic chemicals of tobacco smoke.

Clearly, the mistake we are making is that we are not burning tobacco. This whole ridiculous saga with the FDA reminds me of a child caught in a lie, and having to lie again and again to cover his tracks.

I've been buried with research for some days now, but I have something from the heart for DVap:

:thumbs::thumbs::thumbs::thumbs::thumbs::thumbs::thumbs::thumbs::thumbs:

You, sir, have serious chemistry chops! I totally envy your access to all that orgo glassware and chemicals. You either have an entire lab at home, a very cool boss, or you ARE the boss! You certainly are boss-chemist here.

For those lamenting not having the background to be able to follow this absolutely seminal thread (certainly one of the more important ones), its ok. If you CAN try this at home, that means you have an entire organic chem lab, and also the education to know what to have, how to use it, and why. What he is doing requires many years of advanced, post-graduate knowledge, not just book smarts, but practiced hands. And to make it worse for the novice, he is telling you maybe 10% of the details of what he is actually doing, at most. Unless you are actually a professional organic chemist with years of experience, namely in alkaloid extraction and purification, there is simply NO HOPE for you to do this, and it would lead to almost certain hospitalization, if not death, as in bad awful horrible messy death. I am fairly well trained in this, and I would not want to do what he is doing. For those that are well trained in this, he is actually not doing anything unusual or particularly difficult. Sort of like playing the Bach Unaccompanied Sonatas for cello is not particularly hard for Yo-yo Ma. It really does require that level of expertise.

I do have some general questions and comments. I have some experience with taking a tricyclic MAOI, back in the early '90s for depression. Anyone that takes these, or other antideps, knows that your psychology and physiological response is strongly dose-dependent. A tiny bit too much, and side effects become big. There is also a general danger with MAOIs, in that anything containing tryptamine (I believe) is forbidden. So red wine, hard cheeses, and others I forget. Same could be the case with tobacco MAOIs (TMAOIs). Additionally, MAOIs have fallen out of BP's favor, since they have lots of other side effects (Colon shuts down, weight gain, blurred vision, dry-mouth, sedation), even when used at normal therapeutic levels...which are different for everyone.

The trick is to create a mixture of nic and TMAOIs (and maybe other alkaloids we are not considering) that has the same relative balance as tobacco. Does anyone know the naturally occurring ratio of these alkaloids? Extraction of everything psychoactive is certainly possible, but will it have the same balance, and thus the same relative safety as what is in tobacco? I believe this is an important question, and extraction may not produce said balance, since different substances have different solubility equilibrium constants in a given solvent. You may end up with too much MAOIs compared to nic in the final material, or too much of something that is actually quite active, but we don't know about it yet because in tobacco it is in much lower amounts.


While I am thoroughly impressed by your prowess DVap, I am concerned about your relative safety in giving this final brew a vape. I believe there are too many variables here, and too many unknowns.

I do think all this will lead to excellent learning experiences about tobacco use in general. I just hope they are also forgiving experiences.

There is also the question of why these MAOIs are in tobacco in the first place. It may be that they keep nic from being oxided to cotinine, thus allowing the plant to retain its vital nicotine. Is it known that these MAOIs have dopamine/norepi activity? Or do they just get into us and keep nic from oxidizing to cot, thus allowing us to have the amount of nic needed to maintain the addiction?

Kin, shout out to you too! Excellent literature work and insights! Question: what is the enzyme in your avitar?
 

DVap

Nicotiana Alchemia
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 26, 2009
1,548
1,586
While I am thoroughly impressed by your prowess DVap, I am concerned about your relative safety in giving this final brew a vape. I believe there are too many variables here, and too many unknowns.

Thanks.. It does take some know-how, but the procedural side is simpler than you imagine. It's like the TV repairman who comes in, smacks the top of the TV with his fist, and it starts working perfectly. When he hands the customer the bill for $200, the customer freaks, "All you did was smack it!", the repairman replies, "That's $10 for smacking it, and $190 for knowing where to smack it."

Actually, I have given this more than a little consideration.

Alkaloids partition strongly to the intended phase. While what I have here is, in as far as I'm satisfied, generally representative of the raw tobacco alkaloid spread, whether it is representative of smoked tobacco is another thing entirely.

The pyrolysis (fancy word for combustion) might take a harsher toll on one component or another, and that's the issue I've given the most attention.

I'm convinced that most of the alkaloids that we get are a result of the heat of the proximate red hot coal (that sucker is hot) releasing them from the soon to be burned tobacco to be carried by the inhaled smoke, while those alkaloids in the coal itself are pyrolyzed and end up as contributors to the witches-brew that we call tar. In this analysis, it is likely that the unburned tobacco (and secondarily the filter, if there is one) play a role in the condensation of the vaporized alkaloids. The notion that tar condenses in tobacco, and the last quarter of a cigarette is far nastier than the first quarter is something we all have realized from experience. In this sense, how we smoke a cigarette plays a significant role in the manipulation of the alkaloid mix we receive, and different smoking styles likely produce different alkaloid profiles in the inhaled smoke.

In summary, I believe that different smoking style produces wide enough variations in the profile of the inhaled alkaloids, that vaping the representative alkaloid mix creates an alkaloid profile within or near enough to the alkaloid profile range that might be seen in smoking.

Personally, I find vaping the alkaloid mix at 28 mg/mL to hit far too strongly for my former "smoke that ultra-light 2/3rd's of the way down" style. It reminds me very much of my days in college when I got a complementary carton of unfiltered Camels in the mail, and felt compelled, somehow, to smoke the whole damned thing.

For me, the alkaloid mix feels "right" at around 12 mg/mL, which is coincidentally the concentration of nicotine only e-liquid that I prefer. I just seem to feel like vaping less of it than the nicotine only liquid.
 
Last edited:

olderthandirt

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Mar 28, 2009
9,044
9,192
Willamette Valley, PNW
...
For those lamenting not having the background to be able to follow this absolutely seminal thread (certainly one of the more important ones), its ok.

...he is telling you maybe 10% of the details of what he is actually doing, at most. Unless you are actually a professional organic chemist with years of experience, namely in alkaloid extraction and purification, there is simply NO HOPE for you to do this, and it would lead to almost certain hospitalization, if not death, as in bad awful horrible messy death....

While I am thoroughly impressed by your prowess DVap, I am concerned about your relative safety in giving this final brew a vape. I believe there are too many variables here, and too many unknowns.

I do think all this will lead to excellent learning experiences about tobacco use in general. I just hope they are also forgiving experiences.
...

Hey Kurt
I for one am continually kept in such a state of awe by some of the insights posted here I've no time for lamenting my igor-ance :confused:

And while it's a darn good thing Dvap is only sharing a hint of the actual process being performed, DVap that sig of yours is priceless, I'm with you Kurt with regards possible Jekyll/Hyde outcomes for our resident chemists from self administrations of their brew.

S'pose as long as DVap and Kin keep posting we'll know all is well :D

Back igor, back to your lurking.

lurking.jpg
 

kpolen

New Member
Nov 6, 2009
2
0
Baltimore
I wonder sometimes if some of the folks here actually read (or at least browse) the entire thread? :)

Hey DVap,

My mistake, not sure how I missed your posts. [I must admit to not reading every single post in full, but I took about 15 min or so to go through the thread and get the jist of things]. However, I feel like an idiot, as you are definitely a person to whom I was referring in my post script.

I am going to finish reading the thread now.

Definitely nice to know that the experts are delving into e-liquid advancement. I look forward to continued discussion here.

-Kelly
 
In summary, I believe that different smoking style produces wide enough variations in the profile of the inhaled alkaloids, that vaping the representative alkaloid mix creates an alkaloid profile within or near enough to the alkaloid profile range that might be seen in smoking.

That's my judgement too, as we can be pretty sure that you extracted just about all the nicotine, so the other alkaloids could not be in excess proportion.

It reminds me very much of my days in college when I got a complementary carton of unfiltered Camels in the mail, and felt compelled, somehow, to smoke the whole damned thing.

Just as 'lights' are now seen as a mistake, nic-only e-liquid, and nic-only NRTs are a similar mistake.

I just seem to feel like vaping less of it than the nicotine only liquid.

I maintain that the benefits of WTA are likely more than just MAOI effect, but that alone could explain the unexpected - that even those who do ok with just nic could well do better with WTA.

Toxilogically, WTA will not be different from normal e-liquid to any significant extent. Rather, the greater efficacy of WTA will go some way to answering the critics. It is not an extra burden for us, it relieves that burden somewhat. (* there is a footnote here I will address later)

There have been a few voices raising this issue with regard to NRTs over the years, and their fairly dismal success rate at getting people off smokes. Now we have the beginnings of real evidence to back the (pretty obvious) theory.

:)
 
Last edited:

DVap

Nicotiana Alchemia
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 26, 2009
1,548
1,586
Hey DVap,

My mistake, not sure how I missed your posts. [I must admit to not reading every single post in full, but I took about 15 min or so to go through the thread and get the jist of things]. However, I feel like an idiot, as you are definitely a person to whom I was referring in my post script.

I am going to finish reading the thread now.

Definitely nice to know that the experts are delving into e-liquid advancement. I look forward to continued discussion here.

-Kelly

Information on these forums does tend to get spread out. What was being discussed on the nicotine determination thread in DIY E-liquids has wandered, quite accidentally, over here to Nicotine. So it's quite understandable that, given the sheer volume of posts to wade through (combined with the sometimes mind-numbing technical nature of the posts that some of us more egregious eggheads are known for posting), things can get missed. :)
 
Last edited:

IANAN

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 20, 2009
170
2
So let me get this straight. RJRT creates a heating-tobacco cigarette, the Eclipse (Eclipse - Tobacco Products), which depending on how it is used can still burn tobacco, although 70-90% less than an analog. FDA says sure, no problem, its certainly safer than an anaolg, go ahead RJRT!! The smoke from these, although less than an anolog, is still burning tobbacco smoke!

And they are having a fit over PVs, which burn nothing and do not have the carcinogenic chemicals of tobacco smoke.

Clearly, the mistake we are making is that we are not burning tobacco. This whole ridiculous saga with the FDA reminds me of a child caught in a lie, and having to lie again and again to cover his tracks.

PM and RJRTs release of their products sparked a lawsuit between the FDA and The BT companies that made it to the Supreme Court... In essence the FDA wanted to control these products as NRTs however the Supreme Court voted 5-4 that they were tobacco products hence could not be regulated by the FDA as congress never gave the FDA authority over tobacco products (The ATF was given authority over those).

It is only more recently that the FDA has been given control by congress over tobacco...

Anyhow decided to go "shopping" today... it was a little disappointing. Ran into four well known stores to look for MOAIs (Preferably containing Harmala alkaloids ) containing herbal supplements... I have some Kava Kava on hand but the expiration date was 2001 and I only have 9 capsules left . The "Good People" have really done a number here. Most of the mood enhancing supplements have been removed from the shelves...

...Anyhow settled on a supplement purchased from a well known pharmacy store that has W and the word green in its name. The supplement contains Valerian (Not What I was Looking for), Hops (Are we brewing beer ?), Passion Flower Extract (What I was looking for), and Lemon Balm... Anyhow I don't know if it was placebo or not but I did vape and smoke (Down to 1/3 of what I normally do when vaping alone) less... really didn't have a strong desire to smoke . The Valerian root was 450 mg and the calming blend (The Hops, Passion Flower Extract, etc) is 100 mg in this supplement.

The theory here is it should be possible to supplement Vaping, or other NRTs, with an an herbal supplement with a better safety profile instead of tobacco itself in order to discontinue the use of tobacco altogether...
 
Last edited:

TWISTED VICTOR

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Sep 14, 2009
3,461
67
61
The edge of Mayhem
Dvap and kin, I think I've got this straight, WTA simply means a given nic level would include a given amount of this alkaloid spectrum, ratio staying the same, right? So, theoretically, we might assume that with WTA the satisfaction level comes up, stays longer? Probably not any faster, due to the delivery from vaping, though. Also, theoretically, some of us may be a little overkill :rolleyes: on the nic mg to try and compensate for the lack of these alkaloids, maybe? Just trying to stay up with you. :confused:
 
Dvap and kin, I think I've got this straight, WTA simply means a given nic level would include a given amount of this alkaloid spectrum, ratio staying the same, right? So, theoretically, we might assume that with WTA the satisfaction level comes up, stays longer? Probably not any faster, due to the delivery from vaping, though. Also, theoretically, some of us may be a little overkill :rolleyes: on the nic mg to try and compensate for the lack of these alkaloids, maybe? Just trying to stay up with you. :confused:

Correct :)

Tentatively, the other alkaloids constitute ~10% of the total.
 

ladybug

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 7, 2009
324
13
northern calif.
Really interesting post, and I've had much the same experiences, and the mechanics of it is a mystery to me. You can rest assured that you're not alone.

I could never quit using e-cigs, not even close. I could vap for an hour straight and I still needed a cig. Started using snus and all was well. It gave me the nicotine satisfaction I needed, and the whole oral fixation thing just fell away. Very much a secondary issue for me.

I'm not going to question the validity of those that can quit with e-cigs. I believe it, more power to you. I'm just happy I found a good source of my beloved nicotine from a clean high quality source. If someone figures out whats going on clue the rest of us in please.
I agree,snus did the trick for me,though I try to use small portions cuz hubby says I look like homer simpson(upper lip sticking out) if I use full portions.:)
 

Vaporer

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 23, 2009
1,767
22
Away..
Just tell him you are going for the Angelina Jolie look lol
snus does take the extra off that seems to be missing.
Kind like what got to the "whats missing " part.
The results here so far and in snus threads pretty well substaniate nic alone will help, but not satisfy all.
Check out DVap's blog and see what catagory you are in.

Just like Virgina Slims.........we've come along way baby hahaha

Main credit to certain people, but credit to all because it tells a mystery story you would have thought the gov would have figured out. Or , they knew it and decided to play both sides for the $.

<insert Alfred Hitchcock Theme Here>
 

four2109

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 9, 2009
2,995
1,787
S. Indiana
Vaporer and Dvap.
Thanks for your help on the USP question.
It is "Priority" brand from Tractor Supply. I got a pint of Paddock from the pharmacy, then filled my empty Paddock pint bottle with the Priority brand just to make sure it wasn't because of the volume of liquid. The Paddock has a very faint odor. The Priority is much stronger and something between rubbing alcohol and laquer thinner is the only way I can describe it. The first pint lasted me 6 months so I think I'll just try to kill some weeds with this stuff.
Thanks again,

Dvap Great Work! I volunteer to be a LabRat!
 

IANAN

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 20, 2009
170
2
Ianan,
Try a health food store. I got 350mg capsules. 100 for $8.00. What a difference!

I paid 7.99 for 100 capsules of the supplement... I did hit GNC -- They had nothing useful (Well they did have some Rhodelia)... tried to sell me some vitamin C when I was looking for MOAIs... Might try online for some passion flower extract. I don't want to mess with Syrian Rue or Caapi.

-- Anyhow did some more reading and got the answer I was looking for in regards to why PM looked so heavily at particle size. With regards to e-cigs;

Nicotine absorption site The nicotine dose and
particle size are too small to ensure deposition in
the alveoli or bronchioles and rapid nicotine
absorption as in cigarette smoking.

They basically concluded that e-cig vapor is absorbed through the upper respiratory system and not the lungs... that would explain the 10% measured in the blood vs 40% in vapor difference and the tMax question.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread