Im not sure im using .5 resistance uwell crown III COILWhat gauge wire are you using? It may be too thin for that amount of power.
Im not sure im using .5 resistance uwell crown III COILWhat gauge wire are you using? It may be too thin for that amount of power.
TC does top at 80w. When set to 450 and drag on it it is like taking in slighlty flavoured air. It is disapointing. When Im in wattage mode and i use around 65-70 watts I get a fullbokied flavourful vape and thats what i look for but the little voltage meter in the corner reaches like 6 volts but it only tastes ever so slightly burnrt if a chain vape a bit. When you say the reading seel to be on the lesser side do yoo think im safe vaping at 70 watts or so?
Oh gotcha. You might be better off going with a lower resistance coil. I think .5 coils are designed for lower wattage. I could be wrong though I am not too familiar with sub ohm tanks. You may want to look up what coils are available for it.Im not sure im using .5 resistance uwell crown III COIL
@Fidola13 – Titanium Dioxide is harmful but that does not start to form until ~ 1,200°F – well above safe levels.
in what form is it harmful?? in toothpaste? in make up? in sunscreen? in paint? in about 7000 other products?
So your saying with the air from my draw the vaper may not be getting as hot becasue the air is working against the heating system?FWIW, Wattage in TC mode depends on the way you vape. A 10W vaper needs less wattage in TC mode than a 75W vaper. Air flow is the difference. The higher the wattage the more air flow you need to keep the coil cool and deliver the vape you like and that means you have to jack up the wattage to match your air flow through the atomizer.
If I were to vape at 75W in TC mode with my MTL atty I'd find the coil shutting down before I could take a hit. OTOH, a Subohm tank delivers so much air past the coil that it cools down quickly unless you crank the wattage.
Formaldehyde forms at higher temps. Match the wattage to the air flow and it's not a problem.
Even at a bit over 500F, where the onset of a burnt taste becomes detectable, the amount of formaldehyde in vapor is still only a fraction of that found in real cigarette smoke.
TC does top at 80w. When set to 450 and drag on it it is like taking in slighlty flavoured air. It is disapointing. When Im in wattage mode and i use around 65-70 watts I get a fullbokied flavourful vape and thats what i look for but the little voltage meter in the corner reaches like 6 volts but it only tastes ever so slightly burnrt if a chain vape a bit. When you say the reading seel to be on the lesser side do yoo think im safe vaping at 70 watts or so?
If you set your mod to 450F and it doesn't let you actually reach 70W then that means when in wattage mode you are vaping ABOVE 450F. It's up to you whether or not that is in your comfort zone. What I would do is slowly turn up the temp setting until it "feels" and "tastes" like your normal vape at 70W. Once you get it to taste the same look at what the temp is and that is going to be pretty close to what temp you are hitting in wattage mode at 70W. Then decide if you really want to be vaping at that temp or not.
The 80 watt limit as it is discussed here is a limitation of the Voopoo Drag. In TC, you cannot adjust the applied wattage beyond 80 watts. Why, have no idea – this is a design choice by Voopoo for a DNA device lets you apply what ever wattage the device is capable of. On the Drag you can reach that 80 watt cap in TC – how long it stays at 80 watts will be dependant of the coil used and what temp you have it set at.
Yes I am aware. What I said would not be possible if he normally vaped at 80W or more. Since he vapes at 70 normally, he can set the TC wattage to 80, and then slowly turn up the temp until it tastes like what he is used to and that will be a fairly good indicator of what temp he is at when he is using 70W non-TC.
So your saying with the air from my draw the vaper may not be getting as hot becasue the air is working against the heating system?
Understood. I used that phrase as a deliberately imprecise way of saying "less than".I have always disliked the phrase "only a fraction of". It's way too vague. I mean 99/100ths is "only a fraction of" but there really isn't much difference between that and "the same amount". Of course that phrase could also mean 1/100ths which is a huge difference.
I am in no way disagreeing with the overall meaning of your post. Just expressing my lack of enthusiasm for that phrase.
and it may depend on the composition of the liquid.