The Nano
- Thread starter Renolizzie
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
- Status
The Nano, in theory is a real solution for my personal vaping habits (wants, needs, preference). I personally want simple; I don't want to fiddle with it or have space set aside in my garage for repairing, MODing, wet burns, dry burns, etc. I don't mind paying a reasonable price for a disposable product. I have and WILL stick with SI because they have taken care of me personally, they really care about their customers and they are highly recommended by others. Imagine had said in another post that SI is for beginners and intermediate users but I would also add to that, people like me who just want a simple, quality product and a company that stands behind that product..................and SI is exactly that.
The SI carto was my first buy. It had the simplicity I wanted, it was well constructed (better than others sold on the market), flavor on the pre-filled was pretty good but refilling them lowered the experience each time and was a bit of a chore. I could carry them with me easily without worry of a leak or spill and could turn it any way I wanted to without an issue......... I bought 5 clearos next. The flavor was much better but the lack of mobility and fear of leaking was a big downside to MY PERSONAL PREFERENCE and cleaning them and using them after a fill took longer than I would prefer. I bought CE3s next and the flavor seemed much better to me. Filling them with syringe made me look and feel creepy but I could carry them with me without any issue and basically gave me everything thing I liked about the clearo and the carto at a pretty cheap price. The quirks and the tricks and the methods and QC are really what put me off the most about the CE3 and if those things were not in place, I would say that I found my sweet spot. With the Nano, I really had fingers crossed that it was a solution; the CE3 without the quirks and whatever.
I would pay $5 each for a Nano that performs correctly every time, reliable and consistant. Even though I might appear to be on Team Anti-Nano, I am really not - If the QC or taste or leaking or whatever issues are fixed, I am not buying anything else. When these are working, they are AMAZING and I would encourage anyone to buy one and give it a try................
The SI carto was my first buy. It had the simplicity I wanted, it was well constructed (better than others sold on the market), flavor on the pre-filled was pretty good but refilling them lowered the experience each time and was a bit of a chore. I could carry them with me easily without worry of a leak or spill and could turn it any way I wanted to without an issue......... I bought 5 clearos next. The flavor was much better but the lack of mobility and fear of leaking was a big downside to MY PERSONAL PREFERENCE and cleaning them and using them after a fill took longer than I would prefer. I bought CE3s next and the flavor seemed much better to me. Filling them with syringe made me look and feel creepy but I could carry them with me without any issue and basically gave me everything thing I liked about the clearo and the carto at a pretty cheap price. The quirks and the tricks and the methods and QC are really what put me off the most about the CE3 and if those things were not in place, I would say that I found my sweet spot. With the Nano, I really had fingers crossed that it was a solution; the CE3 without the quirks and whatever.
I would pay $5 each for a Nano that performs correctly every time, reliable and consistant. Even though I might appear to be on Team Anti-Nano, I am really not - If the QC or taste or leaking or whatever issues are fixed, I am not buying anything else. When these are working, they are AMAZING and I would encourage anyone to buy one and give it a try................
Well said Drummerskey! I started with the 808 and went to the 510 mods and tried all the stuff that was around then. I came back to the 808 when SI was born. I prefer simple, easy, plug and play. I also prefer larger capacity like the clearos and T3 but there is definitely a good market for the Nano, just not my thing. I must have refilled my Nano 6 times the day I used it so I am looking forward to less refilling with a 3ml tank.
Well summed up drummer and it's all pretty much my point of view. I just wanna vape.
I think I'm going to like these, after all. I made the mistake of putting a really thick nicquid in the first one. I had to work hard to vape...like drinking a thick shake through a straw. Tried some thinner juice in the second one and it is great. Lots of vapor and what I would call an easy draw. I didn't think anything could replace my CE3s, but these just might. 
Thanks it would help if I could spell today. Do you know what the pg/vg ratio was?
Thanks, Trichman. I couldn't find it on the bottle or maybe the print is so small I couldn't see it.
Thanks, Trichman. I couldn't find it on the bottle or maybe the print is so small I couldn't see it.
Heh I tried looking on the site before I asked but didn't see it.
70/30 isn't usually that thick. Is it maybe the flavoring that makes it so syrupy?
Could be, Cindy. Malty Toffee tastes like dessert. It's good, but thick.
It is 70% VG/30% PG. It says that on their site
I use 50/50 nicquid without any problem in my nano.
I got my nanos about a week ago, but have only started testing them 3 days ago. So far I have had no problems whatsoever. I was seeing some people posting about cracks in the plastic tube, but there are absolutely no cracks to be seen on mine. The tip also seems to be pretty securely threaded into the metal post. I haven't experienced any burnt/weird tastes either. I am using a few 20/80 VG/PG juices and also some thicker Mrs T's Bakery juices. So far all of the juices are wicking great. No crackles/pops like I would get with the ce3s. I have also not had any of them leak a single drop. I'm anxious to see how theses nanos are going to hold up over time. From some other posts I've seen, it seems they may be harder to clean than the ce3s. So far I am very impressed and can't think of a single bad thing to say about them other than the difficult cleaning (although I haven't actually cleaned any of mine yet). I will write another reply in a few weeks after some wear and tear.
From my expierence the inner post cannot be removed for cleaning/ dry burning.
I got my nanos about a week ago, but have only started testing them 3 days ago. So far I have had no problems whatsoever. I was seeing some people posting about cracks in the plastic tube, but there are absolutely no cracks to be seen on mine. The tip also seems to be pretty securely threaded into the metal post. I haven't experienced any burnt/weird tastes either. I am using a few 20/80 VG/PG juices and also some thicker Mrs T's Bakery juices. So far all of the juices are wicking great. No crackles/pops like I would get with the ce3s. I have also not had any of them leak a single drop. I'm anxious to see how theses nanos are going to hold up over time. From some other posts I've seen, it seems they may be harder to clean than the ce3s. So far I am very impressed and can't think of a single bad thing to say about them other than the difficult cleaning (although I haven't actually cleaned any of mine yet). I will write another reply in a few weeks after some wear and tear.
give it time unless you have a lucky star over your head.
I was really...really..really wanting to love these Nanos and the first few days where great.. but now.. I am having the issue where the mouth piece won't thread onto the one nano so it leaks like a sieve. The other I washed and have tried to try it out and it seems still wet cause I can't taste my juice. Ugh..
- Status
