I have to agree, it does suck to have us lumped in with the tobacco users. I do however understand the reasons why insurance companies charge higher rates, and raise them for certain issues. Whether anyone likes it or not they are a business and businesses are meant to make a profit. That being said the insurance industry as a whole actually makes only a 3% profit. However, certain news outlets when they reported the increase from 2% to 3% profit increase, a whopping 1%, they reported that the insurance industry had increased their profits by 50%. While technically accurate it conveys a much more evil spin on health insurance. In reality some insurance companies are actually operating in the red this last year due to the changes made by this health care plan.
People worrying about being tested while in the hospital for nicotine and their claims being denied are alarmists. First your insurance cannot require a healthcare provider to perform such a test, nor can the provider run a test on you without your consent. So telling your insurance company you are a non-smoker is fine.
I honestly cannot completely disagree with them actually raising these premiums on us as former smokers. We did smoke for many years most of us over 10 causing health issues that will cause our medical expenses to be higher for the insurance companies. Yes we have gone onto a healthier alternative, but most of that damage has already been done. We have already laid the seeds for us to get cancer, and by our use of nicotine increase the rate at which the tumors will grow. I say this last part based on recent medical findings on nicotine and increasing blood vessel growth, which can be a good thing, but with tumors causes them to grow more rapidly.
How is it different than a buffet charging more for an adult over a child for all you can eat? I mean my wife as an adult would eat a birds portion, and my son when younger would have cleaned out 6+ plates of food w/o a problem. The risk is for the adult to cost more in food than the child. Just like the tobacco user has a higher risk to cost more medically.
It sucks that a smoker can be charged the rate, but my 300 lb. neighbor cannot be charged. It sucks that a smoker can be charged that rate, but the guy on the motorcycle cannot be charged. It sucks that the smoker can be charged that rate, but the alcoholic down the street cannot be charged. It sucks that the smoker can be charged that rate, but the guy with an arsenal of weapons and children in his home cannot be charged. It sucks that the smoker whose taxes pay for SCHiP can be charged even more than he is already paying. Really, there are few among us who do not have their own bad habits that create a dangerous risk. If we are defining the need to pay upon the risk of lifestyle, there are many many more that we need to include. In reality, there are few in society who fit the fit and healthy profile. Perhaps we need to examine why drug companies are allowed to charge 10 times what they charge for the same drug overseas. Perhaps, we need to investigate the insurance executives to find out why they can charge so much. We can follow that with asking why doctors and the elite in medical care need to charge exorbitant rates for minor care.