The costs of running this huge site are paid for by ads. Please consider registering and becoming a Supporting Member for an ad-free experience. Thanks, ECF team.

tobaccoanalysis.blogspot.com

Discussion in 'Media and General News' started by somdcomputerguy, Jan 9, 2020.

Image has been removed.
URL has been removed.
Email address has been removed.
Media has been removed.
  1. somdcomputerguy

    somdcomputerguy vaper dedicato Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Supporting member
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. Rossum

    Rossum Surly Curmudgeon Verified Member ECF Veteran

    Supporting member
    Dec 14, 2013
    NE FL
    I don't have a problem with saying the "95%" thing may not be accurate. IIRC, the exact phrasing from the RCP was something to the effect of, "Unlikely be more than 5% as harmful as smoking".

    We discuss the degree of harm reduction. It's probably not 100%. It might be 99%, or it might only be 66%, but it's utterly insane to for Eissenberg to advance the notion that vaping may be more harmful than smoking. Sorry, that flies in the face of all common sense, not to mention the experience of millions who have switched.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice