stated that 15% of young people are trying e-cigarettes. I have no idea where she is getting this information (pulling it out of her ....?
We need to ask better questions. Its not where she pulled the numbers from, But:
1. What is the sample size? Anything fewer than 2500 is too few.
2. How many of these kids had smoked analogs? (I'll bet over 90%)
3. How many smoked analogs first?
4. What is the error rate?
5. Was there any surveyors bias? (Give me any answer you want and I can design a questionnaire which will produce the desired effect)
6. What other sampling errors are there?
There are a lot of legitimate ways to disqualify these random studies. If these details are not mentioned without being asked that most likely hints at the error rate being extremely high, probabilistically speaking.
Most live news segments, reporters etc. take questions on Twitter. Direct all responses to them, it reduces the chances of getting into flame wars with people who know little but want a say.
Create enough noise on twitter and we will be heard.
That said:
I was at a convenience store a few weeks ago that I visited often when I used analogs. Was surprised to see he had some brands of disposable ecigs on display. Spoke to him, he had 'em for quite a few months maybe longer. Here's the kicker though, he did not quite know what they were.
There were no warnings on the box, he was unaware that they contained nicotine. He is not dim either. He was immediately concerned as he did not know if he sold 'em to the younger folks, he discarded them immediately.
There are some concerns here. Some of these need to be fixed asap. Unfortunately a handful of people (albeit very small) trying to capitalize on the vaping opportunities are doing stupid things because of the lack of regulations.
I do not want regulations, but when stupid people do stupid things, I am forced to step back and ask is this what is needed?