Urgent New York - Rosenthal at it again! This time, a purported public use ban.

Status
Not open for further replies.

yvilla

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 18, 2008
2,063
575
Rochester, NY
See this: Bills

Unsurprisingly, based on Rosenthal's two utterly stupidly written previous bills aimed at outright sales bans, this proposed statewide use ban is also ridiculously written, such that in it's current state it fails to effectively ban vaping in public, even though that is its sole intended effect.

But, this proposal's very existence is hugely threatening, because if other, perhaps smarter New York legislators decide to support it, the problem with its current language could be easily rectified.

And a possible New York statewide use ban would be just as disastrous for the whole country as would a California use ban. It would be a horrible precedent and inspire other states to follow.
 
Last edited:

ennagizer

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 18, 2013
344
508
South Florida, USA
New legislation would increase regulations on electronic cigarettes
legislativegazette.com/Articles-Top-Stories-c-2013-10-01-85268.113122-New-legislation-would-increase-regulations-on-electronic-cigarettes.html

Assemblywoman Sandy Galef is pushing legislation that would categorize electronic cigarettes, or e-cigs, as conventional smoking along with cigarettes, cigars and pipes. The bill is still being drafted, but would add the product to health law banning traditional forms of smoking.
 

AgentAnia

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
May 22, 2013
3,739
9,455
Orbiting Sirius B
So, Galef's bill is still in the drafting stage, but she grants interviews about it? Looks to me like she's coming to us from the "Legislation by Press Release" ANTZhill...

"...there's no smoking in places like railroad stations, children's playgrounds and hospitals. Smoking...
[Does she mean vaping? AA]
...in any of these places visually demeans what has been done, it's counterproductive and we find more young people gravitating to e-cigarettes."

Only an ANTZ, riddled with ANTZ logic, could come up with a statement like this... :facepalm:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread