USA Today: States target e-cigarettes as potential revenue source

Status
Not open for further replies.

LDS714

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 27, 2013
1,562
3,212
65
Nashville, TN, USA
Ok, let's try a different tack.

Explain to me why eCigs SHOULDN'T be taxed. I'm sorry, but I don't buy the "They Save Lives" reasoning. Not that they don't, but it's still all voluntary, and nicotine consumption remains a luxury, not a necessity. Let's hear some reasonable arguments against taxing eCigs in some manner.
Above and beyond normal sales taxes? Why?

How about a logical argument against the death penalty for using taxation as a social engineering tool?
 

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,272
7,687
Green Lane, Pa
All I'm asking is that instead of tearing down my statements with spurious logic try making some reasonable arguments of your own. I'm not a zealot either way, and I'd love to hear reasons why eCigs shouldn't be taxed. It seems like a no duh to me, but then again I might be missing something.

There's no logical reason that e cigs or e cig liquid should be taxed any different than any other consumer good, at the States sales tax rate. The hardware should be taxed identically to a flashlight. Basically most of the components, sans the heating element and liquid holder are identical. The liquid is PG, VG and water, again sales tax products. The only ingredient in question is the nicotine if you're using it that has any association with tobacco. It's an alkaloid found in tobacco as well as many nightshade vegetables. Unless you can establish a societal cost of vaping, there is no justification for taxing it above and beyond any other consumer product.
 

Sirius

Star Puppy
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 19, 2013
18,632
76,259
North Carolina
Ok, let's try a different tack.

Explain to me why eCigs SHOULDN'T be taxed. I'm sorry, but I don't buy the "They Save Lives" reasoning. Not that they don't, but it's still all voluntary, and nicotine consumption remains a luxury, not a necessity. Let's hear some reasonable arguments against taxing eCigs in some manner.

Consumption of nicotine isn't a luxury imo. It feeds a need. If you're addicted to nicotine as I am, you need to feed that addiction
but juice and mods are not luxury items imo. At least not in the way I'm thinking a luxury item is anyway.
That being said, a luxury tax is for products not considered essential. Charged as a percentage on all items of particular classes, except that it mainly affects the wealthy because the wealthy are the most likely to buy luxuries such as expensive cars and jewelry.
By definition the term luxury tax has remained even though many of the products that are assessed with luxury taxes today are no longer seen as luxuries in the literal sense. The terms "sin taxes" and "excise taxes" would work if we are going to have tax revenues put upon us for our vaping pleasures. I still say we are taxed enough on our other pleasures but I admit I can't see any way around the government not making us pay taxes on it. It would be nice to leave Uncle Sam out of the loop, but with the way people are purchasing all the high end products associated with vaping, I doubt it will be long before Uncle Sam gets into the game, whatever they choose to call the taxes.
 

rothenbj

Vaping Master
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2009
8,272
7,687
Green Lane, Pa
Consumption of nicotine isn't a luxury imo. It feeds a need. If you're addicted to nicotine as I am, you need to feed that addiction
but juice and mods are not luxury items imo. At least not in the way I'm thinking a luxury item is anyway.
That being said, a luxury tax is for products not considered essential. Charged as a percentage on all items of particular classes, except that it mainly affects the wealthy because the wealthy are the most likely to buy luxuries such as expensive cars and jewelry.
By definition the term luxury tax has remained even though many of the products that are assessed with luxury taxes today are no longer seen as luxuries in the literal sense. The terms "sin taxes" and "excise taxes" would work if we are going to have tax revenues put upon us for our vaping pleasures. I still say we are taxed enough on our other pleasures but I admit I can't see any way around the government not making us pay taxes on it. It would be nice to leave Uncle Sam out of the loop, but with the way people are purchasing all the high end products associated with vaping, I doubt it will be long before Uncle Sam gets into the game, whatever they choose to call the taxes.

If you can recall back in the early 90s, there was a luxury tax placed on yachts and expensive cars, I believe. It expired sometime fairly early in the new century. Very little got collected with this 10% tax as people just went out of the country to buy. I know it put a lot of people out of business and jobs in the boat building business.
 

Vocalek

CASAA Activist
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
If you can recall back in the early 90s, there was a luxury tax placed on yachts and expensive cars, I believe. It expired sometime fairly early in the new century. Very little got collected with this 10% tax as people just went out of the country to buy. I know it put a lot of people out of business and jobs in the boat building business.

That's because those who impose taxes keep breaking the law.

The law of diminishing returns.

You can only raise the cost of something so high in your efforts to bring in more money. If you pass that point, you will start to lose money because people will go elsewhere to get what they want.
 

AgentAnia

Resting In Peace
ECF Veteran
May 22, 2013
3,739
9,455
Orbiting Sirius B
That's because those who impose taxes keep breaking the law.

The law of diminishing returns.

You can only raise the cost of something so high in your efforts to bring in more money. If you pass that point, you will start to lose money because people will go elsewhere to get what they want.

As states and cities have learned to their financial disadvantage. Tax cigarettes up the wazoo? People will go to the nearest city or state that has lower taxes, or patronize their friendly neighorhood smuggler and pay no taxes at all. (I believe NYC is finally realizing this...)
 

Sirius

Star Puppy
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 19, 2013
18,632
76,259
North Carolina
If you can recall back in the early 90s, there was a luxury tax placed on yachts and expensive cars, I believe. It expired sometime fairly early in the new century. Very little got collected with this 10% tax as people just went out of the country to buy. I know it put a lot of people out of business and jobs in the boat building business.

rothenbj -- and that is why companies are not doing as much business in the US and moving their manufacturing
overseas. The government has imposed way to many taxes and regulations upon US companies to the point where they can't
make a profit with staying open here in the US. That and unions have all but ruined manufacturing in the US and in turn have
taken jobs from our citizens and given work to others in other countries. It's all about the bottom line, the dollar.
I use to not buy anything but US made goods, but now it's hard to go into any store and not find all of the goods there made in China or other countries that use cheap labor. NAFTA was just the start of a spiraling downward of companies that are US
based moving their factories to China and other places. Those companies that haven't moved all of their facilities to overseas
production have expanded their overseas workforces much faster than the ones at home. At a time when more than 12 million people are still unemployed here in the US.
The government will never learn not to tax businesses into moving overseas, or to impose regulations on them where it
is no longer profitable to make their products. Lets hope they don't start regulating vape products like tanks and atomizers.
But don't be surprised if they do just that very thing.
 

Orb Skewer

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Oct 19, 2011
1,230
2,459
Terra firma
I'm not sure that YOU recognize the difference. You say this is not something you need to do, but what makes you think everyone is just like you?

If you do some exploring on this forum, you will find posts from plenty of people who describe how they become dysfunctional when they stop using nicotine. As David Krogh described in Smoking, The Artificial Passion, "...the smoker begins to turn into something slightly different: a person desirous of his controller, edgy, hostile, depressed, confused. Behold man."

In my case, despite the fact that I did everything I was supposed to do...attended the "learn how to stop smoking class", got the prescription for the patch, stepped down from 21 to 14 to 7 mg in dosage as prescribed, when I took off the last patch, it only took two days to turn me into a basket case, curled up in a ball on my couch, sleeping 12 hours a day, uninterested in personal hygiene, and crying my eyes out without really understanding why.

When I got in my car to go to the doctor, I nearly caused an accident when I looked left, looked right, looked left again and pulled out, only to hear a horn blast, the screech of brakes, and looked in my rear view mirror to see a car inches away from my own. My eyes had probably seen the car coming from the right, but it did not register in my brain. I had several more of these episodes when pulling out of a parking spot or making a left turn. As you might imagine, they were very frightening.

I can be stubborn when I want to be, and I stubbornly refused to stop quitting. Call it "will power" if you like. I kept waiting for those "temporary" withdrawal symptoms to stop. After 6 months, when they had not done so, I went back to the doctor who prescribed the anti-depressant that fixed up the sleeping problem and the depression, and asked her to give me some way to get back the 50 or so IQ points I seemed to have misplaced when I stopped using nicotine. When she told me there was nothing she could prescribe for that, I told her that I couldn't afford to lose my job, and so I was making a conscious decision to resume smoking. My boss had been very understanding about what I was going through for 6 months, but now I was being assigned to work onsite at the client's place of business and my performance was suffering from my inability to concentrate and pay attention.

So, SimianSteam, regardless of what you believe, people are not interchangeable. One person's mere want is another person's minor need, and is still another person's vital need.

Because nicotine improves the ability to concentrate and pay attention, improves mood, improves visual memory, and relieves anxiety, people with special needs in those areas find that nicotine helps them be able to function normally. Those taking anti-psychotic medication often fight terrible side-effects, and nicotine seems to help keep those side-effects under control.

Nicotine analogs are being studied to treat a wide variety of diseases from Parkinson's to Tourette's Syndrome to Ulcerative Colitis.

So I say, if we are going to put a luxury tax on anti-depressants, anti-anxiety medications, drugs to treat ADHD, MCI, dementia, or any other disease with symptoms nicotine can help to control, then--and only then--we can think of nicotine as a luxury. Many people are using nicotine as a low-cost, readily available, self-medication that is darn near free of side effects--especially when compared with drugs typically prescribed to treat those conditions. (Think suicide, think uncontrollable muscle movements, weight gain, etc. etc.)

Some people can get by with using Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT) products as their long-term substitute for smoking, but not everyone can. And, again, there's no luxury tax on Nicoderm, Nicotrol, or Nicorette.

Since e-cigarettes are closest in design to pharmaceutical nicotine inhalers, and as far as we know are no more hazardous to health than NRTs, I see no reason to pretend that they are a tobacco product and include them in the Draconian laws that are applied those products.

A slightly tenious but related link Elaine

We, the vapers of the World could be in a prime position to aid in 'studies' regarding (isolated) Nicotine and brain chemistry-Thats IF those (insert very bad words here) leave us all alone to carry on as before without too much interference.
another arrow in the quiver ? (it may mean aligning with that big bad word at the moment re 'classification' -medicine).

BBC News - G8 'will develop dementia cure or treatment by 2025'
 
Last edited:

Vaporlass

Full Member
Verified Member
Sep 9, 2011
49
114
Texas
Volcalek said it perfectly...
Studies are showing nicotine isnt as bad as we have been led to believe by society. Studies suggest it has been used to self medicate -which means its saved lives and not just the user -in my case it has saved the lives of others. Some people refer to my Provari as a crack pipe but I tell them its my Peace pipe. It helps keep me peaceful among the natives. :evil:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread