I'm in the camp that says there is a, rather clear, distinction between vaping and smoking.
Yet, I think this comes down to target audience and more so, who cares what others think, really?
If current smoker approached us (vapers) and said, "I really love smoking, but don't like the poor health effects." I believe many here, perhaps myself included, would persuade the person to consider vaping instead, and would insinuate that vaping is just like smoking, at some point. If that person were to say something like, "I heard vaping is nothing like smoking and I really love smoking," I'm curious how those, in the same camp that I am, would handle the situation. Methinks you'd say something along lines of, "it is a lot like smoking, virtually the same."
But if non-smoker or ex-smoker approaches us and says things like that mentioned in OP, then suddenly it is us saying, "they are completely different."
I as dual user can lay honest claim to the fact that I am no longer addicted to smoking. So, not sure how the addiction thing really matters when the perception is (among the vast majority) that smoking at any amount is inherently bad. Therefore the substitute is seen as very closely the same.... type of problem.
We are having this discussion on a thread, in a sub-forum titled, "General E-Smoking Discussion." That name will stick because smokers need to know that it is virtually the same and that there is a suitable alternative which amounts to THR.
I can very much relate to need to vent in way OP did, and pretty sure I've done similar thread/post here on ECF. Yet nowadays, I mostly don't care about others opinions unless they really want to walk through the distinctions and have civil discussion. If they want to just preach ANTZ rhetoric, then I'm apt to say it is smoking, for you, not for me and am very glad to tackle your issues with smoking first before we get to vaping. Let me know when you are up to the task.
Yet, I think this comes down to target audience and more so, who cares what others think, really?
If current smoker approached us (vapers) and said, "I really love smoking, but don't like the poor health effects." I believe many here, perhaps myself included, would persuade the person to consider vaping instead, and would insinuate that vaping is just like smoking, at some point. If that person were to say something like, "I heard vaping is nothing like smoking and I really love smoking," I'm curious how those, in the same camp that I am, would handle the situation. Methinks you'd say something along lines of, "it is a lot like smoking, virtually the same."
But if non-smoker or ex-smoker approaches us and says things like that mentioned in OP, then suddenly it is us saying, "they are completely different."
I as dual user can lay honest claim to the fact that I am no longer addicted to smoking. So, not sure how the addiction thing really matters when the perception is (among the vast majority) that smoking at any amount is inherently bad. Therefore the substitute is seen as very closely the same.... type of problem.
We are having this discussion on a thread, in a sub-forum titled, "General E-Smoking Discussion." That name will stick because smokers need to know that it is virtually the same and that there is a suitable alternative which amounts to THR.
I can very much relate to need to vent in way OP did, and pretty sure I've done similar thread/post here on ECF. Yet nowadays, I mostly don't care about others opinions unless they really want to walk through the distinctions and have civil discussion. If they want to just preach ANTZ rhetoric, then I'm apt to say it is smoking, for you, not for me and am very glad to tackle your issues with smoking first before we get to vaping. Let me know when you are up to the task.