Wall Street Journal trashes ecigs, including a video on Hulu

[spaceballsrules]

http: //online. wsj . com/news/article_email/SB10001424052702304448204579184052293918312-lMyQjAxMTAzMDEwMjExNDIyWj?tesla=y

http: // www . hulu . com/watch/557951

 

[tommy2bad]

WSJ reprints the 10 Things article and I have no idea why. It wasn't a good article or accurate so WSJ must be stuck for page filler.
With so many good articles they could have chosen, you have to wonder if theirs an agenda here or some sponsorship, perhaps it just a business pandering to advertisers. Who knows. We just have to suck it up and comment.
As to the video, excellent example of how to get 5 wrong facts into 2 miniuts, and he looked so confident of his opinion too.

 

[Uma]

Thankfully, Bill Godshall & Dr. Ross are on the ball in the comments section.

 

[Anjaffm]

What an utter bull poo poo article

Just look at the headline:

10 Things E-Cigarettes Won't Tell You
They're Safer and Cheaper, but They Could Upend Anti-Smoking Efforts

... and after "safer and cheaper" they go on to claim utter bovine excrement? Duh..
And who needs "anti-smoking efforts" (for big money) when smokers switch to e-cigs voluntarily, eh? That is the real question behind all that blathering. Like in a criminal case: just look who profits. And you will find your culprit pretty soon

The comments by Dr Ross and Bill Godshall ROCK!