I remember the last time this kind of stuff happened, it was with mechmods the last go around. There were things happening that people didn't know about, so when I posted some cautions about going too far, there was a tremendous pushback. Everybody and his dog was telling me I had gone too far, didn't know what I was talking about, the vendors are all saints who have our best interests at heart - and all the rest of it.
It stopped soon enough when the media picked up on people blowing their faces off, though.
People are welcome to their opinions; but if they are not in a position to know everything that is going on, they might consider not promoting that opinion as gospel.
My position on this topic is clear: RBA use and sub-ohming is not dangerous, contrary to the many posts I have read that warn that it is. That opinion seems to be regarding the battery aspect, but using a single cell in any device has never caused any serious incident that we are aware of. It is important to avoid warnings about things that have no evidence for danger, otherwise people will disregard genuine warnings.
However, mechmod-RBA use is one of the most variable forms of
vaping, and an individual can easily take it beyond the boundaries of what is generally recognised as safe. For example, by stacking batteries then driving them hard in a sealed metal sub-ohm rig. If the individual chooses to do that, it's fine by me, as the Darwin Awards generally take care of it. It's bad for
vaping when that hits the news but realistically there is nothing we can do about it; and since I'm a believer in ultimate personal freedom, I wouldn't really want to stop others doing whatever they like anyway.
What I very strongly object to is members promoting extreme
vaping as the norm, where beginners can get the idea that madness such as stacking cells then driving them at high amps in a sealed metal tube inserted into the face is a good idea. I will do anything and everything possible to point out the huge risk elevation implicit in certain operational modes of vaping to those who may not have the experience to recognise the risk.
RBA use is not the same as sub-ohming. Many people use RBAs now and we can legitimately regard that as a normal and safe form of vaping.
Some go further and drop coil resistance below 1 ohm. This is a small minority of vapers as a whole (there are about 8 million in the USA by my calculations, and there are probably around 80,000 sub-ohmers or less, so that's <1% of the vaping population). Sub-ohming
per se is equally safe, but there are limits. Nobody knows exactly what those limits are yet. It is not correct to present the most extreme forms of sub-ohming as 'normal' to beginners. Experienced vapers probably realise that super-heating refills with ultra-low-ohm coils, and vaping 20ml of creamy custard a day, and stacking batts driven hard in a sealed tube inserted into the face, have additional risk. Beginners, newcomers, and others may not, and it is simply our duty to point this out.
What people do if/when they know the risks is up to them. Suggesting there is no elevation of risk no matter how far you go is just wrong.