Why do vapers expect to be treated differently than smokers?

Status
Not open for further replies.

newbie85

Full Member
Jul 6, 2013
56
8
Malaysia
An interesting POV, Scott. My concern is that vaping and vapers are being lumped in with smokers and demonized in the same way. If one believes, as I do, that vaping is a better alternative to smoking and should be encouraged, then we shouldn't buy into the "it looks like smoking so we should treat it as smoking" mindset.

like +++ 100
 

Gematria

Full Member
Jul 12, 2013
36
29
37
Denmark
Vaping in public.

Encouraging people to start vaping....even non-smokers and children.

Some of these 'public vapers' need a soapbox/pedestal in a crowded shopping mall to advertise the fact they can 'vape in public and save lives'.

One member here said, "I will continue to Vape everywhere I go." Very bold statement....WILL...EVERYWHERE.

Vaping IS a better/safer alternative to smoking.

Better to target smokers. Not the whole community.

For many smokers, the whole smoking prohibition campaign was a serious blow against their freedom.

By allowing vaping in places where one could smoke back in the day, I'm sure a lot of smokers would be motivated to buy into vaping simply to regain that freedom.
 
Last edited:

Bob Chill

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 22, 2013
1,773
5,360
Sans Nom, USA
There are more than enough studies to show that second hand vapor is 100% safe for those near by. One of the most recent was in Inhalation Toxicology Journel last November. There is more dangerous substances in regular air in every major city in the world than in second hand vapor. So do more research but don't put the bar higher than the regular air we breath everyday or you are just as bad as those who want vaping banned everywhere.

I know it's safe. I read anything and everything before I started so I could make an informed decision. Turned out to be an easy one. However, asking the general public to accept a very small independent study or two and just say "sounds good. Vape everywhere and anywhere" isn't possible. If vaping came before cigarettes then it would be a whole different ballgame.

I think the overall acceptance has made excellent progress in the push towards mainstream acceptance but it's still a touchy subject for many non smokers. I wasn't trying to minimize the need to push back and explain in my post. I think it came off that way. Way too many people are ignorant and could care less about any study. It just looks like a duck therefore you cannot do that is something that we just have respect even though it's aggravating as you know what. It's futile to argue with those folks and they're prolific.

Seems like most everyone (at least in this forum) is quite respectful of others. That's pretty huge. Each curious onlooker that gets educated about it is a small victory and a teeny step towards what we all want and know. But until a big public study is done and *proven* safe we all just have deal with getting lumped with smokers more often than we want. No biggie. I've stealth vaped pretty much anywhere I want and vaping in the house is divine so personally, I feel like I have plenty of freedom already.

My wife was really nervous when she went on a business trip and had to ride with coworkers for 4 hours in a car. She knew she had to either explain and ask or suck it up and go vapeless. She explained and asked and was met with huge open arms in the car. She said the group was fascinated. The all wanted to try it for giggles because it smelled good but nobody smoked and she didn't have any zero nic.

At the hotel she figured she would try it in the lobby and bar. Not one single person cared and many were fascinated. Strangers were asking to try it in the bar and she had an extra cigalike with ry4 that got passed around until the batt died. Just like everybody else's positive experience, I was thrilled with the story but I know it doesn't always work out like that. Our time is coming but we're not there yet so patience is required. We're winning tiny battles but the big victory won't come until the government deems it safe and publicly declares it.
 

serendipitee

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 7, 2013
235
152
Grapevine, TX, USA
Thanks for vaping respectfully and advocating it. I dont think vaping should be viewed at like smoking though. I just completely understand the need for limitations much like speed limits. The crazy thing about the vaping community is that its full of such friendly and nice people but than its like split down the middle and the other half is people that have this "society owes me attitude". Ive met vapors that literally only vape just to go out in public places and make a point that they can smoke wherever they want. A simple guy like me, i just wanted to better my health and my familys. All in all imo i understand alot of people need their nicotine so bad that they will destroy everyone around them if they dont get it. But walking into a kids birthday party at chuck e cheese and chain vaping at 8 watts or blowing vapors in everyones face at disneyland is where the real ridiculousness is. After all, most laws that are in effect are because of the few bad apples right? It definitely should not be banned i dont agree with that. But if people are gonna be immature (wich they are), than their should be laws sorry but thats where i stand.

These vapors you speak of are not SMOKING!
 

serendipitee

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Jun 7, 2013
235
152
Grapevine, TX, USA
I'm not trying to be a douche, but the eureka moment you had has been discussed here about 100 times.

In the end, we are stuck with it and it is too late to change it.
The whole world knows them as electronic cigarettes, and we don't have any power to change that.

And yes, we have tried, which is why we started trying to call them personal vaporizers.
It didn't even stick here amongst us very well.

Also, it really doesn't matter what we call them, because those that don't want to see "smoke" don't care what they're called.
In fact, many that are opposed to ecigs are now calling them ENDS and they still want them out of sight and out of mind.

ENDS = Electronic Nicotine Delivery System
WHO | Questions and answers on electronic cigarettes or electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS)

As many hours as I have spent in these forums in the last 6 weeks, and it is no small number, this is a topic I have never run across. Admittedly, I have never done a search on the topic.

It's not being a douche to point out facts, thanks for letting me know. Here I was, unaware in my underwear. :D Here I thought I had a brilliant idea and it has died of loneliness. :facepalm:

It's never too late! How can you say "we" don't have the power? We do if we want it!

Isn't it a matter of commitment? Anyone in for the long haul has a vested interest in changing the perception. Anyone with a dog in the hunt (vapers and industry players) that continues to refer to the equipment as "cigarettes or cigs" knowing the negativity it brings to the practice is doing vapers and the industry a disservice.

How hard is it to start referring to the equipment differently? If that's too hard, we get what we deserve. Tissues were tissues until Kleenex came along, copies were copies until Xerox came along, gelatin was gelatin until Jello came along, right? I can't at the moment think of anything where a negative association was changed into a more neutral or positive one, but surely they exist, that's what marketing is all about.

In short order, mine will no longer be an ENDS anyway, as by October, I intend to only vape 0mg nic juice. Maybe that doesn't matter, maybe it does.

Meanwhile back at the ranch, I'll be thinking of something snappy to call my stuff. You guys do whatever you want but prepare to reap the consequences or rather prepare to continue to reap the consequences.
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
We're winning tiny battles but the big victory won't come until the government deems it safe and publicly declares it.
Before I comment further on this, I just want to check...

Are you aware that "the government" is totally against electronic cigarettes and would continue to be even if they KNEW they were safe?
I'm talking about the FDA, the CDC, and any other agencies that are in a position to endorse electronic cigarettes.
 

ricks

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 11, 2011
7,245
10,303
61
Moscow PA
They are against ecigs because they are losing millions of $ from the loss of taxes on cigarettes. Maybe Billions by now...
Before I comment further on this, I just want to check...

Are you aware that "the government" is totally against electronic cigarettes and would continue to be even if they KNEW they were safe?
I'm talking about the FDA, the CDC, and any other agencies that are in a position to endorse electronic cigarettes.
 

Vander615

Senior Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 8, 2013
228
764
Red Boiling Springs,TN
Before I comment further on this, I just want to check...

Are you aware that "the government" is totally against electronic cigarettes and would continue to be even if they KNEW they were safe?
I'm talking about the FDA, the CDC, and any other agencies that are in a position to endorse electronic cigarettes.
And they are totally against it because big tobacco tells them to be.
 

CES

optimistic cynic
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 25, 2010
22,181
61,133
Birmingham, Al
And they are totally against it because big tobacco tells them to be.

Big tobacco isn't our friend, but they're just getting into the game. BT is fine with e-cigs, as long as they're the ones that produce them. The big pharmaceutical companies stand to lose more from vaping- and it's the pharmaceutical companies been pushing anti-vaping legislation and junk science for years. BP has been hiding behind the screen of the public "health" associations (ACS, ALA etc) that get large donations from BP.
 
Also, it really doesn't matter what we call them, because those that don't want to see "smoke" don't care what they're called.
In fact, many that are opposed to ecigs are now calling them ENDS and they still want them out of sight and out of mind.

ENDS = Electronic Nicotine Delivery System
WHO | Questions and answers on electronic cigarettes or electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS)

After reading the linked article, all I can say is WOW! And not a good wow, either. No author is referenced, nor are any sources of the mystery writer's opinion that I could see. (If I missed that info, sorry). That this article is posted on the site of a supposedly respected health authority is alarming, on many levels.
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
How so? We certainly aren't now, right?
I'm really curious and sincere, will you elaborate, please?
We are the ones that let them push us into the back alleys when we were smokers.
And we are the ones that aren't doing nearly enough to fight for what is right in order to prevent it from happening again.

My only hope is that we will rise up and make our voices heard loud and clear should the time come.
But my fear is that too many of us will just put our tails between our legs, grumble a little bit, and take what they give us.

Either way, we'll get exactly what we deserve.
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
After reading the linked article, all I can say is WOW! And not a good wow, either. No author is referenced, nor are any sources of the mystery writer's opinion that I could see. (If I missed that info, sorry). That this article is posted on the site of a supposedly respected health authority is alarming, on many levels.
That represents the official stance of the World Health Organization (WHO) regarding electronic cigarettes.
 

wv2win

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 10, 2009
11,879
9,045
GA by way of WV
We are the ones that let them push us into the back alleys when we were smokers.
And we are the ones that aren't doing nearly enough to fight for what is right in order to prevent it from happening again.

My only hope is that we will rise up and make our voices heard loud and clear should the time come.
But my fear is that too many of us will just put our tails between our legs, grumble a little bit, and take what they give us.

Either way, we'll get exactly what we deserve.

You are exactly right, DC. How many people who commented in this thread are supporting members of CASAA? How many even bother to put a CASAA banner on their posts? How many have written their elected offcials on the positive effect of vaping in their lives?

What are vapers waiting for??
 

wv2win

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 10, 2009
11,879
9,045
GA by way of WV
................We're winning tiny battles but the big victory won't come until the government deems it safe and publicly declares it.

The FDA already did one study that showed vaping was safe. But what did they do? - they lied and strongly implied it was not safe.

Our only hope is to get behind CASAA, by joining, financially supporting them and actively writing our representatives and even demonstrating where needed, to bring out the truth about the safety of vaping.
 

jac1766

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 7, 2013
1,793
3,055
The 6th circle
It was shocking to me when smokers started getting banned in the first place. I grew up in a time when you could smoke anywhere.

I do understand some of the restrictions. They make sense. But, many of them do not.

If we're not smoking, why should we be treated as if we were? Even smokers should have more rights than they are given nowadays. It's gotten to the point that smokers are being treated as if they don't even have the right to exist at all.

IOW they really should have a good reason before they restrict anyone's legal rights. Not just because they feel like it.

I remember walking through the mall, the grocery, Dr.'s offices etc... and hardly anywhere was off limits. Then came the smoking section in most businesses and a great many non-smoking areas, like my high school campus. Fine, it wasn't as if the govt were infringing upon my rights, it was the choice of the owners and administrators of these facilities. When the states started outright out-lawing smoking and the public villifying smokers in general I was up in arms as the choice of private property(business) owners was preempted by a vocal minority through a mostly corrupt political class.

The excuse of this infringement was the health of the non-smoker. Before the law was passed(rammed down our throats) non-smokers were given greater clean-air options as more and more businesses went non-smoking all on their own. I was fine with that. It was a matter of the owner/mgmnt's choice.

One reason I chose Vaping is to regain MY options. It is NOT smoking and I will not be restricted as a smoker. In many places, I do stealth-vape, places like shopping areas (stores) and traditionally non-smoking venues (stealthy but obvious to any paying attention). In bars, I ask first. In smoking areas I vape like a steam-engine.

If questioned, I explain, if told to stop, I do. But I won't leave a bar and stand in the rain/snow/hail to vape. If they send me out, I don't come back...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread