Why don't people want e-liquid labels changed?

Status
Not open for further replies.

KingOhms

Full Member
Feb 10, 2015
19
10
Pittsburgh
I think its important to educate both the young and the mature on the dangerous impacts of nicotine. When I was little, my parents took me through the house with Mr.Yuck stickers and educated me on everything that was bad for me by having me place the stickers on things that were harmful to ingest. A little effort towards teaching safety goes a long way. That being said, like others on this thread, every bottle of juice I have bought contains a warning that there is nicotine in the container and to keep away from children and pets. Regulation may be needed to enforce this warning, but not what color and images the label can have on it. Any regulation on appearance of the bottle aesthetically is unjustifiable in my mind. Once you cross that line, then why wouldn't you regulate everything aesthetically pleasing that is harmful in some way. From the top of my head, sugary carbonated beverages, candies, kid cuisines, kia car commercials. not the best examples but they justify my point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jman8

Lessifer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2013
8,309
28,986
Sacramento, California
When it comes to advertising/marketing/packaging...i just don't think it's asking a lot for the vaping industry to not use common things that appeal to both adults AND KIDS...which is dual marketing and for many, it looks like shady and sneaky marketing tactics. For example, something like papa smurf or teddy bears... I like both of those, but clearly so do many 5yr olds and 13yr olds so obviously it doesn't belong in the marketing of this product, especially when this product has the potential to cause harm or death.
We are adults we don't need to be marketed to like a kid in order to vape right?..isn't vaping/devices/flavors/nicotine our top priority?

If the vaping industry can't figure out how to market in a neutral manner, opposed to sending the message that the industry and it's users are suffering from an age identity crisis that renders them incapable of differentiating between adult marketing verse child marketing, then harsher regulations are going to be reflective of an industry that has demonstrated it needs more oversight and guidance given. Or we could see minor regulations that is reflective of a industry that can self regulate and not need guidance to help it understand who it is marketing to and who it is not and to understand the difference and why.

I want to fight the good fight as well, not the one that takes away measures that help minimize harm to kids when their parents fail them. If it only saves the lives of a few children and stops only a few teens..it was well worth it. These preventative measures in no way would threaten my ability to vape...but dissing measures that protect kids and businesses continuing with irresponsible business practices most certainly will.

I agree the child card gets used and abused a lot on many things and yes, there are things being pursued against the vaping industry based on pure political corruption and ill agendas ( I am a hoosier and well versed on political corruption),....but in this case on these matters i agree with the regulators. I care about what's in the bottle and flavorings, not the cute flavor name, bottle shape or labels. I don't want more regulations so as a vaper i prefer to pick my battles wisely and fight for what is most important to me...and it's certainly not these things. Sorry but i refuse to fight with regulators to keep things like papa smurf on ejuice labels, i refuse to support keeping names like Mr. Cookie as the flavor name, i refuse to fight for things like a teddy bear shaped bottle of ejuice. My battleground is flavoring & Nic, but as long as we have these other things being used against us, flavoring and possibly Nic is going to be dragged down with it.

Yes, children and teens love bubble gum, but the difference here is flavors are contained and hidden within a bottle with a child proof cap. As long as the cap is securely locked and we don't scream bubble gum in large letters but rather use a small font print like halo does with no colorful bubble gum cartoon images, the flavor inside is kept very discrete and hidden. I just don't think this is asking for much on this end of things and a reasonable expectation of the industry.

Apparently i am not the only one who refuses to throw a losing card into the fight that will only do more harm then good to our cause...and for what again? oh yeah things like Papa Smurf, Mr. Cookie and Teddy bears LOL!!
VapeFreeYouth.com

Well, let's get some definitions out there, and if you disagree with my definitions, please provide your own.

Marketing - Branding intended to get a group of people to purchase your product over a different product.
Advertising - Usually print or tv ads, aimed at getting people to buy your product.
e-liquid - liquid meant for direct consumer use. Usually found in 36mg/ml nicotine strength or less.
liquid nicotine - Concentrated nicotine liquid, intended for diluting to proper use strength.
kids - ages 1-11(?)
teens - ages 12-20(?)

Let's tackle advertising, the only advertising I've seen has been by Blu, Vuse and Njoy. There could be others, but I haven't seen anything with any of the flavors we seemed to be concerned with.
Marketing is a complicated issue. What's the goal, to not get teens to BUY e-liquid? The age restricted sales ban SHOULD cover that. It hasn't worked for cigarettes, but neither has the flavor/marketing ban. Now if the goal is to keep kids from drinking the stuff, warning labels and CRP should cover that. If a parent doesn't read the warning label, shame on them. Now let's look at the toxicity of nicotine. Liquid nicotine can be toxic, in high concentrations, all of which come in plain packaging with numerous warnings. E-liquid, the stuff that could have the bright packaging, is not concentrated enough to be toxic except to maybe those under 2 years of age, whose gag reflex may be inhibited. Again though, CRP and warning labels should cover this.

The main problem that have with this whole issue though is, if you accept that there is a problem with a smiling cookie label, and the name "Mr. Cookie," what reason do you have to justify the existence of a cookie flavored e-liquid. If you accept ridiculous illogical arguments, you can't go back and refute them, you've already accepted them.
 

DeAnna2112

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Apr 21, 2015
817
1,732
Indiana
Well, let's get some definitions out there, and if you disagree with my definitions, please provide your own.

Marketing - Branding intended to get a group of people to purchase your product over a different product.
Advertising - Usually print or tv ads, aimed at getting people to buy your product.
e-liquid - liquid meant for direct consumer use. Usually found in 36mg/ml nicotine strength or less.
liquid nicotine - Concentrated nicotine liquid, intended for diluting to proper use strength.
kids - ages 1-11(?)
teens - ages 12-20(?)

Let's tackle advertising, the only advertising I've seen has been by Blu, Vuse and Njoy. There could be others, but I haven't seen anything with any of the flavors we seemed to be concerned with.
Marketing is a complicated issue. What's the goal, to not get teens to BUY e-liquid? The age restricted sales ban SHOULD cover that. It hasn't worked for cigarettes, but neither has the flavor/marketing ban. Now if the goal is to keep kids from drinking the stuff, warning labels and CRP should cover that. If a parent doesn't read the warning label, shame on them. Now let's look at the toxicity of nicotine. Liquid nicotine can be toxic, in high concentrations, all of which come in plain packaging with numerous warnings. E-liquid, the stuff that could have the bright packaging, is not concentrated enough to be toxic except to maybe those under 2 years of age, whose gag reflex may be inhibited. Again though, CRP and warning labels should cover this.

The main problem that have with this whole issue though is, if you accept that there is a problem with a smiling cookie label, and the name "Mr. Cookie," what reason do you have to justify the existence of a cookie flavored e-liquid. If you accept ridiculous illogical arguments, you can't go back and refute them, you've already accepted them.


You know what i find not only sad but disturbing Less, is when people like you come on a forum and down play the dangers of a substance that has the potential to harm or kill a child. We don't know who is lurking on these forums but i just hope you have not left the wrong impression on a young person or a newbie to vaping and it causes them to be less concerned about handling and storing their liquid.
As far as the Mr. Cookie comment..if you didn't get it after reading my post then there is no since in explaining the obvious point again i was making. Sorry you comment just didn't make any sense Less.

New England Journal of Medicine....one of the most prestigious and respected medical journals in the world.
MMS: Error

Small ingestions could be deadly. With an estimated median lethal dose between 1 and 13 mg per kilogram of body weight, 1 teaspoon (5 ml) of a 1.8% nicotine solution could be lethal to a 90-kg person.
With the growing use of e-cigarettes, physicians need to be alert for nicotine poisoning. They also need to educate patients and parents about this danger and advocate for measures that will help prevent potentially fatal liquid nicotine poisoning of infants and young children.

Sounds like some tips you could use Less :pervy:
 

Lessifer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2013
8,309
28,986
Sacramento, California
You know what i find not only sad but disturbing Less, is when people like you come on a forum and down play the dangers of a substance that has the potential to harm or kill a child. We don't know who is lurking on these forums but i just hope you have not left the wrong impression on a young person or a newbie to vaping and it causes them to be less concerned about handling and storing their liquid.
As far as the Mr. Cookie comment..if you didn't get it after reading my post then there is no since in explaining the obvious point again i was making. Sorry you comment just didn't make any sense Less.

New England Journal of Medicine....one of the most prestigious and respected medical journals in the world.
MMS: Error

Small ingestions could be deadly. With an estimated median lethal dose between 1 and 13 mg per kilogram of body weight, 1 teaspoon (5 ml) of a 1.8% nicotine solution could be lethal to a 90-kg person.
With the growing use of e-cigarettes, physicians need to be alert for nicotine poisoning. They also need to educate patients and parents about this danger and advocate for measures that will help prevent potentially fatal liquid nicotine poisoning of infants and young children.

Sounds like some tips you could use Less :pervy:

How much nicotine kills a human? Tracing back the generally accepted lethal dose to dubious self-experiments in the nineteenth century

"Despite these uncertainties and the complex pharmacokinetics of nicotine (Hukkanen et al. 2005), a rough estimate of the amount of ingested nicotine from postmortem analyses of blood levels appears feasible. Smoking a cigarette results in uptake of approximately 2 mg of nicotine and gives rise to mean arterial plasma concentrations of about 0.03 mg/L (30 ng/ml) (Gourlay and Benowitz 1997). Based on 20 % oral bioavailability of nicotine (Hukkanen et al. 2005) and assuming linear kinetics, an oral dose of 60 mg would give rise to a plasma concentration of about 0.18 mg/L. The literature reports on fatal nicotine intoxications suggest that the lower limit of lethal nicotine blood concentrations is about 2 mg/L, corresponding to 4 mg/L plasma, a concentration that is around 20-fold higher than that caused by intake of 60 mg nicotine. Thus, a careful estimate suggests that the lower limit causing fatal outcomes is 0.5–1 g of ingested nicotine, corresponding to an oral LD50 of 6.5–13 mg/kg. This dose agrees well with nicotine toxicity in dogs, which exhibit responses to nicotine similar to humans (Matsushima et al. 1995).

...

The discrepancy between the 60-mg dose and published cases of nicotine intoxication has been noted previously (Matsushima et al. 1995; Metzler et al. 2005), but nonetheless, this value is still accepted without scrutiny and taken as the basis for worldwide safety regulations of tobacco and other nicotine-containing products. Nicotine is a toxic compound that should be handled with care, but the frequent warnings of potential fatalities caused by ingestion of small amounts of tobacco products or diluted nicotine-containing solutions are unjustified and need to be revised in light of overwhelming data indicating that more than 0.5 g of oral nicotine is required to kill an adult."

The US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health is pretty well respected as well... perhaps you should work on your google fu.
I never said that it shouldn't be kept out of the hands of small children, just that it's not as lethal as you and many others seem to believe it is.
 
Last edited:

philoshop

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 21, 2014
1,702
4,306
geneva, ny, usa
You also apparently didn't get my point, that the people who are waving the red flags about marketing and flavors will not be satisfied with a plain label, they want the flavor gone too.

The fact is, they want vaping gone entirely. It doesn't fit into their worldview. Nothing is a small concession.
Carrion crow nibbling at the edges until the whole organism succumbs and they can feast.
 

PermaPuff

Account closed on request
May 22, 2015
76
29
34
I collect the bottles because of the interesting labels, if they make us change the lables it's just more game like sanctions. They don't make tobacco companies change their designs because they appeal to teens with sexy designs. If you think I'm making up the idea of sexy designs you need to do more research. Cigars are flavored, cigarettes are not, is a completely different issue and discussion.
 

AndriaD

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2014
21,253
50,807
64
LawrencevilleGA
angryvaper.crypticsites.com
You must be kidding - isn't NEJM the home of the latest and greatest formaldehyde scare article? Prestigious and respected, eh?

Yeah, they're a legend in their own minds. :D

Andria
 

AndriaD

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2014
21,253
50,807
64
LawrencevilleGA
angryvaper.crypticsites.com
.5 grams of nicotine to kill a man? That's not alot...

That would be .5 gram of PURE nicotine... the highest concentration that we deal with is 100mg, which is only a 10% concentration.

Andria
 

AndriaD

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2014
21,253
50,807
64
LawrencevilleGA
angryvaper.crypticsites.com
I understand that. When an ejuice bottle is labeled 12mg does it mean their is only a total of 12 mg in the bottle or does it mean 12mg/ml?

12mg/ml. Multiply that by the number of mls to get the total quantity in the bottle. It can also be expressed as 1.2%/ml.

Andria
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lessifer

AndriaD

Reviewer / Blogger
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 24, 2014
21,253
50,807
64
LawrencevilleGA
angryvaper.crypticsites.com
Ok so my math is not squify in quantifying that it would take a small child only two 32ml bottle of 12mg/ml mixture to kill themself. Worst outcome of course, not trying to kick a dead horse, just wrap my head around it.

Probably true... but have you ever tasted 12mg eliquid? It's really not tasty. I could maybe see the kid getting 3-5ml down, before going UGHHH!!!!!! and throwing it down. And where is the parental supervision that would disallow any such youngster even getting their hands on it, nevermind turning it up and drinking it. Children don't exist in a vacuum -- there's pretty much always an older person around somewhere, and if not, then that eliquid is the least of the problem. What about all the other poison in most homes? all that junk in the laundry, garage, under the sink....?

Kids don't wander around grabbing stuff and drinking it. The ones small enough that might actually try it, are likely to have the most and closest supervision.

Andria
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,620
1
84,746
So-Cal
I understand that. When an ejuice bottle is labeled 12mg does it mean their is only a total of 12 mg in the bottle or does it mean 12mg/ml?

We say an e-Liquid is 12mg. But we Should be saying 12mg/ml.

Every Milliliter of liquid contains 12mg of Nicotine.

So a 30ml Bottle of 12mg/ml has 360 Total Milligrams of Nicotine in it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread