Well, I ended up sighting in 4 rifles for a friend the other day so I thought I'd share my impressions on them here. 2 were brand new, 1 was slightly used, and one was over 50 years old (his very first rifle!). All were in .22 LR. First up on the bench was his old Springfield/Savage that we've been dorking around with for the past 6 months trying to get it into condition to actually shoot which included replacing the barrel that had a suspect bulge near the end of the barrel and cleaning out over 40 years of accumulated dirt and residue and it's not a 'simple' gun by any means but more on that later. Without going into too much detail, this is a gun that probably should have just gone up on the wall and never fired again. Not very accurate at all even at 50 yards when we threw an old Tasco tip-off scope on it! I think we'll just end up refinishing the stock and he'll use it in extreme emergency only...
Next up was a brand new Savage 64FVXP that for some reason came with a Bushnell variable power scope instead of the fixed 4x that was listed from the factory. I don't know why it came with it, but neither one of us were complaining to say the least! This particular model doesn't come with factory iron sights btw. The trigger was nice enough with a fair amount of 'slack' or take up and a little bit of creep before it would actually break (break meaning 'fire' not 'fail'). Once I got it on the paper it ended up being reasonably accurate but not the tack driver he was hoping it would be. Spent a fair amount of ammunition trying to get it just right but couldn't get better than ~1-2" groups off a rest. Decent enough for most.
Next in line was his wife's stainless and synthetic Ruger 10/22 with a matching Simmons 22 magnum scope. I was confident I could hit the bull's-eye within 10 shots (and told him so! Have I mentioned I love Ruger 10/22's?) to say the least. First shot, completely off the rather large target. WTF?!?! Maybe it was a flyer, second shot, same thing... Looked very hard at him and asked what the hell he'd done to it. He came back by telling me that neither one of them had shot it yet and it's just like they bought it (used). Uh-oh. I might need more than 10 shots and this just might be why the former owner sold it... I decided to see exactly where it was hitting from point of aim, checked where the range officer was looking, and shot in the dirt between 'official' target boards. More than THREE FEET over where I was aiming, *poof*! Cranked the scope 60 clicks down, fired again into the dirt and it looked about 1.5 ft over POA. Damn, but at least it's responding... 40 clicks down and switch back to paper, 4" high, 1" left. 8 down, 2 clicks right, still 4" high but centered. I start to get worried here at 6 out of 10 shots, I hate being wrong so I put another 12 clicks down and... 7th shot clips the very top of the 1/2" bull's-eye! I shoot a 2nd 'verification' shot and open of the hole a little more... I start to give it one more click so it's 'dead-on' and he gives up saying it's good enough for his wife. Two important things about this, we never got a ragged hole with the Savage and he doesn't like the Ruger and thinks it's a 'kids gun'. Even after out shooting ALL his other rifles (including the Remington which is next) in every aspect, he doesn't like them! As an added bonus, his wife is a consistently better shot than him. Hell, she's better with a pistol than me for sure!
Last one to get sighted in was the Remington 597 in matte/synthetic. This is the only one we sighted in with just the iron sights. From the factory it's set up for 100yds but my eyes were not up to it after a couple hours of sighting in guns (boy are my eyes getting old now!) so I asked him what he wanted to do since tools are required to adjust them (no bobby pin ramp on this one!) and he said 50yds is where he wanted them, fine by me! Right off the bat I started noticing little differences between the Remington and the Savage, some good, some not. Where the Savage's trigger was light with a little creep, the Remington's was heavier but very, very, crisp. I almost wish the Ruger's trigger was that clean if it wouldn't take away the fun factor. The Remington is a 'serious' little rifle. Once I moved the sights back to the first mark, it hit flat and 2" to the left... 'verification shot' made a ragged hole of the 1st shot! Unfortunately the windage adjustment isn't on a worm gear so it took me another 3 shots to get it dead on centered after a couple over-compensation adjustments. It was so good I convinced him to take the scope off his 'old' gun and put it on there so we could see what we could see at 100yds. This is when the problems began. Up to this point we were shooting CCI Stingers but ran out and had to switch to CCI MiniMags that were not exactly factory fresh. I'm hoping it was the ammo and not the rifle because there were more than a couple duds, jams, and stove pipes. We did get it sighted in at 100yds but the groups weren't that nice and the 'zero' was between shooting an inch right or left depending on what it felt like that shot. I personally feel like the Remington is a better rifle than the target was showing that day. The Remington also has one 'feature' that I don't really care for, the magazine release is on the right side above the trigger. It wasn't exactly in the same location as one on an AR 15 but that's as close an I can describe it. I'm sure with more practice, I'd get used to it but it didn't feel like a natural extension of magazine replacement like the Savage or Ruger. It won't replace the 10/22 as my favorite 22 but I would take it over the Savage just for the accuracy potential I saw.
At the end of the day, he tried to pay me for sighting in his rifles. I laughed and said "Seriously? You want to pay me for shooting up your ammo after you already paid for the range time?!? I was going to ask if you wanted me to mow your lawn to make up for it!". I told him any time he wanted someone to shoot his guns for him, I'd be more than happy to do it. I did tell him to reconsider the Savage. Nice 'bonus' scope or not, it should have shot better than it did and might have been a factory return for that reason. I also told him to keep an eye on the Ruger's scope acting up again. I've never had to crank a scope 100 clicks (in the same direction at least) to get to zero so the detents might be worn. Who knows what kind of life it had before he bought it?
All in all, it was a good day. I almost forgot to mention that the Range Officer was interested in my Buzz VV. I told him to check out the site and our forum so time will tell if he takes me up on it. Now that I think about it, I have that Mako just sitting there in a drawer, I should go make a deal with him on it to get him hooked.. er... started.
