Shinyitis Support Group

Morning shinies

I'll swap places @Letitia. It was 88°F here yesterday, I much prefer the cold!

View attachment 1034767
I'm the opposite; I'll take sweaty over layers of clothes and still be cold any day! On top of that I'm afraid to take my girl out for more than a few minutes when temps are that low. I didn't take her out this morning since I wouldn't be home to keep an eye on her.

INNOKIN PLEXUS PRO & GO DEVICES REVIEWED BY BIGBOB2322

Airflow is fully adjustable on both devices by way of a slider control using 3 holes that can be reduced to tailor the vape, fully open is a RDL vape, completely closed down is a tight MTL vape. The USB-C charge port is in different spots for both devices, both can be charged in the upright position.


20251213_093546.jpg

20251213_093344.jpg



Innokin ships these devices with a sticker covering the bottom of the pod to prevent a accidental firing so don't forget to fill the pods, let them sit for 5-10 minutes then remove the safety sticker. Both devices use 1 airflow intake nozzle making the airflow very smooth and quiet.


20251213_091907.jpg



The biggest difference between the two devices is a slight more battery capacity ( 350mAh ) and a display screen with adjustable wattage on the Pro and it's a hair taller than the Go. Both batteries last a good long time and depending on your style and frequency of vaping you should get a full day of life or need 1 recharge. The Pro shows you the battery strength along with a puff counter on a screen while the Go uses a LED ring around the fire button with 3 colors indicating battery strength.


GREEN - 100-30%

YELLOW - 30-10%

RED - 10% And Under


20251213_082154.jpg

20251214_111551.jpg



FINAL IMPRESSIONS


My thoughts on both devices are this, each one has it's place. For the vaper that likes to play with wattage settings fine tuning their vape to their particular liking along with a visual showing their info on a screen then the Plexus Pro is for them. I haven't even said how great the flavor is on both of these pods, Innokin coils and pods have had good flavor in the past but they have really improved on their flavor production with these pods.

I like the fact that on the Go everything is set for me except for airflow, it makes things simple for out and about trips. Both of these devices have the ability to lock/unlock the fire button with the simple quick 4 presses of the fire button. I prefer a device with a auto draw feature if it functions correctly and both devices do it nicely.

It really doesn't matter to me which device I grab because there pretty much the same device. I also think that the Plexus Go would make a great choice for someone transitioning from cigarettes to vaping because it's so simple to use with great flavor as well. The top fill is a great bonus also.

I highly recommend both the Plexus Pro and the Plexus Go and give them both a solid A rating. I would like to thank Alisa and Innokin for providing both Plexus devices for my review and I would also like to thank all of you that read my reviews.


THANK YOU
BIGBOB2322

NEW Flavor Series from Bull City Flavors Reviewed by SessionDrummer

fc77deb17c82ffdd62ff3f1eeae91898d91d78f3.jpeg


f8c9be48063c9170aff13188dfec19330ed52456.jpeg


da8174ce8389a3ec76f266191e49fd0cc5d57088.jpeg




Alright people, JUST mixed these up, and they are **STEEPING**. With only the Rich Vanilla to worry about, I decided on a short 1 week steep, and a 3.5% testing weight.

> As always, these are mixed and steeped as listed, in a 70v/30p/3mg base. Tested on the SteamCrave RDTA v.1, running dual vertical Kanthal 24ga. coils, with Koh Gen Do cotton. Fresh or dry burned coils w./ fresh cotton before every test. Tested at 65 watts.

These flavors were provided free of charge for the purposes of these reviews, but you'll get it, like I get it.

**Baja (BCF) 3.5%/5.5% (12-7-25)** -- FINALLY (after a short 1 week steep), breaking into this BRAND NEW Series from Bull City Flavors. Because it was a BRAND NEW line, I had to guess as the percentages, and this one I started out at 3.5%, but bumped up to 5.5%. It was much fuller at the higher weight, but not linearly, so the single flavor ceiling might be closer to 5%. At the higher weight, it was VERY close to a Baja Blast Mountain Dew. No other way to put it. I almost did a double-take, to see it the flavor was Teal colored LOL. Exactly like the soda, it was centered around a sweet, smooth lime, with some lighter Pineapple accents. There were possibly some other fruits in there, but they were to hard to pick out, with the exception of maybe a mango.

At 5.5% it was fairly full, and at about a 7/10 on the strength scale. Sweetness was just about mid-level, and I couldn't pick out any squirrel-y notes, and/or any complaints. About my only want would have been just a bit more saturation, but that was about it. VERY true to a Baja Blast. There was a slight fizzy-ness, but only slight. All in, a great first one, from this batch of first ones, and leaving it high at an **8.8/10**. You CAN do the dew with this one. :)

**Blueberry (BCF) 3.5%/5.5% (12-7-25)** -- I also started this one out at 3.5%, but 5.5% proved to allow it to open up a lot more. This one was a VERY interesting take on a Blueberry, as it straddled not only a natural blueberry, but also a slightly candied/jammed. A VERY interesting medley. I think that blueberries are one of the FEW flavors, where a little "funk" actually IS a good thing, and this one had JUST enough, to add to the overall depth, and realism. Just a TOUCH of funk.

At the lower 3.5% weight it was good, but just wasn't as full and deep, as it was at the higher weight. Strength wise, at the higher weight, I would give it an 8.9/10 on the strength scale. Sweetness was a few ticks below mid level, and I could find NO off-notes to complain about. All in, this was a very "fresh" take on a blueberry, which was fairly complex, with natural, candied/jammed nuances, along with just enough of the funky-ness. On the finish, there was also a nice little punch, which presented as slightly tarty, almost somewhat fermented, which in this flavor, was an absolute PLUS. Very complex, tasty, and didn't leave you (or me) wanting. Leaving this near the top end, at a **9.4/10**.

**Blue Raspberry (BCF) 3.5%/5.5% (12-7-25)** -- 3.5% felt a little thin, and 5.5% worked much better with this one. Tart, Sour, and Blue were the big take-aways with this one. The good news is Bull City Flavors left out the Blue #1. It doesn't matter how many people you talk to, no one really knows what's in a Blue Raspberry. Some seem to have banana, pineapple, even cherry on top of a tart raspberry. This one seemed more centered around a blueberry, sharp/tart raspberry combo. Perky, tart, and fairly artificial, but true to the actual ICEE flavor (for those of you in the US).

No off-notes, and sweetness was surprisingly lower than expected, at a few ticks below mid-level. I typically don't like over-sweetened flavors, as you can't take it out, BUT, I think this one might actually benefit from a touch of sweetener, to help it POP more. Kudos out to BCF for not over-sweetening it, as that left it up to US to decide. At 5.5% it wasn't a screamer, and it was about a 7.5/10 on the strength scale. All in, a good tart raspberry/blueberry-ish combo with lower than expected sweetness levels. Leaving this one fairly high at a **8.5/10**.

**Candy Cane (BCF) 3.5%/5.5% (12-7-25)** -- Like the previous flavors, I started out at 3.5%, and quickly bumped it up to 5.5% where it was much fuller. This one smelled literally, EXACTLY like a candy cane in the bottle, and when testing it, that's EXACTLY what I got. One of the most impressive things for my tastes, was that there was very little cooling effect, which is very common in many/most mint flavors. There was a slight hint of cooling on the finish, but that was IT !!!! I don't use cooling agents, so that was a big deal for me.

At 5.5% it was very good, and at about a 9.5/10 on the strength scale, and I had ZERO wants with this one. No off-notes, and even though it was billed as a "candy" it actually came in a tick or two below mid-level sweet. Very authentic, and literally, a perfect candy cane, nothing more, nothing less. Bull City Flavors did an outstanding job with this one, as it wasn't simply a sweetened peppermint, but they really captured the almost "smooth" candy texture if that makes sense. Very good, and I can't believe I'm going to do this for a "mint" flavor, but release the Kraken folks, too spot on not to. **10/10**. Get your peppermint bark recipes ready.

**Cherry (BCF) 5.5% (12-10-25)** -- Initially (because of past cherry incidents), I was hesitant to try this at the higher 5.5% as some cherries can go nuclear when tested too high. My fears however, were misplaced, and this one did NOT hit DEFCON 1 levels. It presented as a fairly artificial cherry, with hints of natural. It actually reminded me of a mashup between a Luden's Cherry Cough Drop (no medicinals), and a Rita's Water Ice Cherry. At the 5.5% weight it was fairly strong, and at a 8/10 on the strength scale. Sweetness was just below mid-level, and I didn't get any scary off notes from this one.

It leaned heavily towards an artificial maraschino, and there was some slight dryness on the finish. Overall it was very smooth, and missing much of the tart or bite that some fresh cherries have. If you need a natural cherry, this one may not work out for you, but for smoother, artificial needs, this one would work out. All in, a very smooth, heavily artificial cherry. Saturation levels were great at 5.5%, and the only knock would be the slight dryness on the finish. Leaving it high at a **9/10**.

**Coffee Candy (BCF) 5.5% (12-8-25)** -- The moment I started this test, I was immediately struck with, "This is just like an RY4, but for Coffee" !!!! Yes, that was my first thought, and I was never able to shake it. I don't think I've ever had a "Coffee Candy" (or a Candied Coffee, more on that later.....), but this flavor made me wish I had. Because I ended up increasing all of the previous flavors to 5.5%, I've moved this, and all the remaining up as well. At 5.5% it presented as a pretty believable (you guessed it), Coffee Candy. It tasted like a mix of both coffee and espresso, at about a 60%/40% Coffee/Espresso split. After the finish there was a great lingering just slightly bitter coffee/espresso note, which completely worked here.

The carrier for the caffeines seemed to be mostly caramel, but I swore I was getting a light vanilla cream note in there as well. Sweetness was just above mid-level, which worked for a "candy". No off-notes, but I had one thought. I kept thinking it was more of a candied coffee, than a coffee candy, which I think worked in it's favor, as the focus was more on the coffee, than the sweet. It was an outstanding flavor, and I'd probably give it a 10/10 on just the taste, but the "candy" part had me somewhat unconvinced. It was soo good, I didn't feel right marking it down too much for that one aspect, so I finally decided on a **9.5/10**. Very good, coffee w./ espresso, layered on top of a creamy, slightly vanilla'd carrier, with a touch of caramel. DAMN good !!!!


**Grape Slush (BCF) 5.5% (12-11-25)** -- Right Out Of The Gate I had two big take-aways from this one. First, I was GLAD as hell that BCF did NOT taint this flavor with ANY COOLING !!!! The second, was it was EXACTLY what it claimed to be. If you wanted cooling, you could ADD it, and DAMN, this tasted exactly like a sweet, grape, almost candied syrup that you would pour over shredded/crushed ice, and enjoy on a hot summer day. EXACTLY. As previously mentioned, I stopped playing around with 3.5%, and just started testing at 5.5%, and this one POPPED at this weight. I don't think I've ever done this before, but I"m giving it a 10/10 on the strength scale. Grape, grape, and MO grape here people. I could try and list a hundred different comparisons to try and convey exactly what it tasted like, like grape bubbleyum, grape nehi, tart grape candies, but I think you get the idea. It was almost entirely artificial, with only hints of natural grape, sweetened higher as you would expect for a slush/ie syrup, and kissed off with just a bit of tart/sour on the finish.

The grape profile was actually kind of complex, despite being a one dimensional "artificial" grape, as it wandered around a bit, and sometimes it would make me think of grape bubble yumm (the grape, not the gum profile), other times a grape nehi soda, other times simply a great candied syrup. It didn't really keep you guessing what it was, but it kept you interested if that makes sense. Sweetness was a couple of clicks above mid-level, but never reached "cloyingly sweet' status, and it worked for the flavor profile. All in here, BCF nailed the flavor, as it tasted to me exactly as it should, and at times, it reminded me of how I responded to my first tests of Medicine Flower Blueberry. Blueberry explosion !!!! Well, hehe, this was a GRAPE explosion my friends. Not natural, not like the fruit per se, so if you want that, look elsewhere. If you want something to make a Grape Slushie, WITH, the ability to add cooling if you WANT to, get this flavor. I can't not release the Kraken again with this one. **10/10**. Zero hesitation.

**Mango (BCF) 5.5% (12-14-25)** -- Out of the gate, I could tell this one was going to cover MORE of the Mango spectrum than most. My current go to has been Flavor Express Mango which excelled at the bright and punchy notes. Kind of syrupy, but never a full on "syrup-ed" flavor, nor candied. Sweetness was about 2 ticks above mid-level, and without any off-notes to complain about, it did have just a touch of mango funky-ness, that did help sell it even more.

At 5.5% it was damned full, and near the top of my Strength-O-Matic strength scale, and it landed at about a 9.2/10 on the strength scale. This mango was really a FULL spectrum flavor. Juicy, bright yellow and orange punchy notes, sparkly high end notes, and even more of the mid, and mid-dark lower notes to fully round it out. Syrup notes, but not sickly sweet, and just a touch of funk. It was honestly, very hard to fault this one, or decide where it might NOT work out. About my only "ehhh" was a slight dry kick on the finish, but only on the finish, and very minor. Leaving this juicy one high at a **9.2/10**.

**Peach (BCF) 5.5% (12-14-25)** -- Moving onto the Peach, and 2nd to last in this series from Bull City Flavors. At 5.5% this one presented more of a semi-vague yellow peach. I mean, it was actually a GREAT flavor, and had aspects of a juicy yellow peach, fairly natural, and with some nice syrup-d notes. It just didn't feel like it made it 100% of the way there. Throughout the tests, I kept getting the aforementioned notes, along with a light apricot, and if you can believe it, an almost red delicious apple. Now, hehe, this wasn't an apple flavor, but I did get some of that in the mix.

At 5.5% it was present, but not what I would call strong, and maybe an 8/10 on the strength scale. I didn't get any definitive "off-notes", but it still felt like it could use a little help getting across the full on peach finish line. With that said, I could see loads of uses for this one, but maybe not as the primary yellow peach driver. Very tasty, but not 100% of the way there. Leaving it squarely at an **8.1/10**.

**Rich Vanilla (BCF) 5.5% (12-14-25)** -- Moving on to the LAST ONE in this series, and maybe the one I wanted to test the most (kinda). Right from the start, I could tell, this wasn't going to be a "regular" vanilla ride. I picked up on a few notes from this one, a Madagascar Vanilla, an interesting bakery undertone with caramel, and nutty-ness (??), some light spicy-ness, and a creamy carrier. WOW, talk about a complex flavor. The creamy undertone/carrier was a very interesting inclusion, and it stayed present, but below the main vanilla note, and helped bridge in the caramel, bakery, spicy notes. The nutty-ness was a guess, as it wandered around a bit to avoid complete isolation.

At 5.5% it was almost too damned good, and almost assaulted you with it's rich, creamy, vanilla. I would put it very high on the strength scale at this percentage, about a 9.7/10. It tasted very solidly in the Mada camp with it's darker notes, and slight spicy-ness. The amount of notes/nuances might sound like a lot, but as a whole they worked in concert, and presented as, well, a pretty Rich and Interesting Vanilla. I have to say, it had a lot more than I had expected it to. I could see a LOT of uses for this one, and honestly, I can't think of another flavor on my racks that it was like, and I've got a LOTTA racks, so that's saying something. No one wants to buy a flavor, only to dupe another one (or more), that they already have. You won't with this one. If you are in the mood for a hella surprising "vanilla" flavor, madagascar based, with light bakery, nutty, and spice notes, riding on a smooth creamery carrier, you might want to look at the BIG bottles for this one. Sweetness was about mid-level, and it worked here, and I could not find any off-notes, complaints, or hell, even any "wants" with this one.

I love it, when I can close out a series, especially a NEW series, with a banger, and that's exactly what happened her folks. Releasing the Kraken one final time in this new flavor line from BCF with a **10/10**. I have quite a few "Vanilla-Head" friends, and I can't wait to hear what they think.

**Root Beer (BCF) 5.5% (12-10-25)** -- After @Lynda_Marie asked me I'd tested this one, I bumped it to the front of the line. I was curious to see what she tasted, but as always, I don't read ANY other reviews, before I complete mine. Let me start this by saying, if you love a traditional, old school, home made Root Beer, you should BUY this flavor. Period. Bull City Flavors really nailed this one. Before I get into the specifics, the thing that most impressed me, was that I could actually TASTE the individual ingredients, and they were in an almost perfect ratio. Right out of the gate you were slammed by a very good Wintergreen, followed directly by an almost as powerful anise/black licorice, and it finished with a somewhat creamy vanilla note, topped with JUST the right amount of cinnamon. Now, even though I could easily pick out those notes, they summed together into just a damn near perfect Root Beer.

At 5.5% it didn't taste like it was smashing the ceiling, and it was about a 9.9/10 on the strength scale. Sweetness was about a tick above mid-level, and I, hehe, GAVE UP trying to find any complaints, wants, or issues with this one before I even finished the first tester. This one was SOO good, that it might have just knocked my current secret weapon [Tasty Puffs Rasta Rootbeer](https://tastypuff.com/product/rasta-rootbeer/) off of it's perch. I didn't get any overt "fizz", but it did have a little bite to it, that honestly, worked just as well. NOTHING was lacking in this flavor, and as you may have guessed, it's BBA (Big Bottle Approved). In closing, one of the other great things about this one, was it didn't present as a "generic" RB, or even a Fanta, or Shasta, but as an honest, Homemade, Old School Root Beer. Releasing the Kraken on this one folks. NO hesitation. **10/10**. Can't wait to throw this in with some LB VIC !!!!

**Strawberry (BCF) 5.5% (12-12-25)** -- As the number of Strawberries on the market increases, I always wonder if the one I'm testing will be different, or unique in any way from all of the others I've tested. Luckily BCF made it easy on me with this one. It WAS fairly unique, and that's always GREAT for me when testing. It presented as a fairly "artificial" strawberry, but with some unexpected TWISTS. It was candied, but maybe almost more of a syrup, or syrup'd might be more accurate. Throughout the tests, I did keep getting some damned nice jammie notes, and some high end, sparkly notes. The initial on-rush was very full, and with some jammie notes, but the mid and finish morphed into a smoother strawberry. It actually proved to be fairly complex throughout my tests. I kept getting a light under tone that I had a hard time nailing down, and I think it was similar to a juicy white grape note. Very light, but still there, and worked very interestingly along with the SB notes.

At 5.5% it was full, and I'd rate it at about a 8.9/10 on the strength scale. No real complaints other than a slight dryness at the very end. I got brief, very slight natural notes, but overall it was 98% artificial. My first mixing thoughts were Strawberry Milks, SB Malted Milkshakes, etc., and it would power them very nicely. I think we can all agree that coming to market with a new and unique SB is hard, but BCF did it, with this one. If you're looking for a realistic natural, this one isn't for you, but it you are in the mood for a VERY good, unique, and complex artificial SB with some nice tart, and syrupy jammy notes, this one SHOULD be on your list. As a general rule, I don't mark down purely for artificial or natural for that matter, and it is/was a great SB. My only complaint would be the ever so slight dryness on the finish, but that was minor. Leaving this sticky sweet one very high at a **9.6/10**.

Pick some up from Bull City Flavors:

Main Review Thread:

INNOKIN PLEXUS PRO & GO DEVICES REVIEWED BY BIGBOB2322

1765728940231.png



1765729035475.png



FIRST IMPRESSIONS


Packaging of both devices are pretty standard with both devices resting in a foam cutout, the Plexus Go only comes with 1 0.8Ω pod while the Plexus Pro comes with a 0.8Ω and a 0.6Ω pod.

Both devices are pretty lightweight with the Go being in a Matt Black color and the Pro being in the Iridescent Lavender color that really shines in good lighting conditions. Both devices were off and needed to be turned on with 5 quick presses of the fire button.

Surprisingly both devices were fully charged when plugging then in to charge. Checking the strength of the pod magnets I found them to be strong, so strong it actually connects itself when the pod is very close to the device.

The pods are top fill by way of a sliding top cap that has a arrow pointing which the way to slide the top cap, I wish it was white in color because in dark conditions it's hard to see it.


20251213_073705.jpg

20251213_074716.jpg

20251213_074834.jpg

20251213_075635.jpg

20251213_120905.jpg

20251213_101027.jpg

20251213_101931.jpg

Attachments

  • 20251213_121055.jpg
    20251213_121055.jpg
    700 KB · Views: 4

INNOKIN PLEXUS PRO & GO DEVICES REVIEWED BY BIGBOB2322

Hello folks and welcome back for today's review on 2 devices that are very similar but in the same token very different. I'm talking about the Plexus Pro and the Plexus Go devices from Innokin. Both of these devices are tube type vape devices with the Pro having adjustable wattage and adjustable airflow control with a rechargeable 1350mAh internal battery with a maximum power output of 25 watts. The Plexus Go on the other hand is a simpler device having fixed wattage by way of smart wattage in which the device senses the pod being used and sets the correct wattage for that pod. There is adjustable airflow as well with a rechargeable 1000mAh internal battery with a maximum wattage output of 20 watts. Both can be vaped using the button or auto draw, the button can be deactivated on both devices. Let's check out these 2 gems now.


1765724219244.png



COLOR CHOICES ( PLEXUS PRO )


1765724375579.png



COLOR CHOICES ( PLEXUS GO )


1765724425309.png



IN THE BOX
( PLEXUS PRO )


* Innokin Plexus Pro Device


* Plexus 0.6ohm Dual Mesh Cartridge 2ml

* Plexus 0.8ohm Mesh Cartridge 2ml

* Quick Guide


IN THE BOX
( PLEXUS GO )


* Innokin Plexus GO Device


* Plexus Cartridge (2ml/0.8ohm Mesh)

* Quick Guide


PLEXUS PRO SPECIFICATIONS AND PARAMETERS



Specifications​


Plexus Pro Parameters:




PLEXUS GO SPECIFICATIONS AND PARAMETERS


Specifications​


Plexus Go Parameters:





PLEXUS PRO FEATURES


1765726843231.png


1765727103291.png

1765727123373.png

1765727179093.png



• Dimensions: Sleek and Portable


• 360°Transparent Pod Cartridge: 2ml E-juice Capacity


• Rechargeable Internal 1350mAh Battery


• Top Slide Filling Design


• 0.87-inch Color Display Screen: Battery Life, Output, Resistance and Puff Count


• For Tight MTL / Light RDL


• Resistance Options: 0.6ohm Dual Mesh Coils (20-25W) / 0.8ohm Mesh Coil (13-16W) / 1.2ohm (Best for MTL)


• Compatible with Innokin Plexus Replacement Pod Cartridge


• Type-C Fast Recharging


• 0.01s Fast Draw Inhalation


PLEXUS GO FEATURES


1765726882962.png


1765727222085.png



• Dimensions: Sleek and Portable


• 360°Transparent Pod Cartridge: 2ml E-juice Capacity


• Rechargeable Internal 1000mAh Battery


• Top Slide Filling Design


• 20W Max Output For Vaping


• For MTL - RDL


• Resistance Options: 0.8ohm Mesh Coil (13-16W)


• Compatible with Innokin 0.8ohm and 1.2ohm Plexus Replacement Pod Cartridge


• USB-C Fast Charging


• 0.01s Auto-draw Inhalation


iTASTE POD



1765727507396.png












BrandInnokin
Product NamePlexus Pro Kit
Max Output25W max
Battery1350mAh
Display0.87" color screen
Airflow ControlRear airflow control
Frame304 Stainless Steel
Included Cartridge1x 0.6Ω Dual Mesh, 1x 0.8Ω Mesh
Refill SystemTop-sliding refill
Capacity2ml
ColorMidnight Black, Navy Blue, Shadow Grey, Pearlescent Cream, Pearlescent Rosaline, Iridescent Lavender
Packing Size70*25*145mm (1pc)
Carton Size39*35.5*28.5cm (130pcs, approx. 16.78kg)
BrandInnokin
Product NamePlexus Go Kit
Battery Capacity1000mAh
Max Output20W
DisplayLED indicator
AirflowSide airflow control
Included CartridgePlexus 0.8Ω Cartridge
Draw Activation0.01s auto-draw
Pod Capacity2ml
FillingTop filling
ColorFrost Blue, Indigo Blue, Moonlight Silver, Midnight Black, Sakura Pink

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit Review By Frenkyou

  • Like
Reactions: Innokin_Alisa

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit Review By Frenkyou

On the top of the device is the PB LED, which consists of three lines. When the three lines are white, the charge level is between 75 and 100%; two white lines indicate between 75 and 30%, one white line indicates 30-10%, and one red line indicates less than 10%.

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 11.jpg


Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 12.jpg


The excellent magnetic connection between the PB and the vape pen ensures the two modules remain securely connected. The overall capacity of this kit is 2,400mAh, so it has a fairly high energy reserve considering that the 1.2Ω and 1.6Ω cartridges deliver fairly low power, typical for MTL vaping, at 12W and 9W, respectively.

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 13.jpg


Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 14.JPG


The bottom of the EZ Leva Kit shows the USB-C charging port for the 2,000mAh power bank. This image also shows the bottom of the vape pen, where its 400mAh capacity is displayed.

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 15.jpg


The metal body of the EZ Leva Vape Pen is a guarantee of sturdiness. The design is slim and sleek. The light weight of this vape pen allows you to vape simply by closing the pen between your lips, which I find very useful, especially when your hands are full. On the side, you can see the two small air passages, perfect for MTL vaping.

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 16.jpg


The EZ Leva Vape Pen holds the cartridge in place with two small but very powerful magnets. Inside the compartment are gold-plated contact pins and a puff activation sensor. As I mentioned earlier, when you insert the cartridge into the pen, vibration feedback kicks in, and the LED displays the current charge percentage.

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 17.jpg


The Leva kit includes two cartridges, one for 1.2Ω (12W) and one for 1.6Ω (9W). They are color-coded for easy identification and provide good visibility of the e-liquid level. Lifting the rubber fill cap allows you to fill up to 2.5ml of e-liquid, and the protective membrane on the port helps prevent overflow during filling. Innokin kindly sent me two packs of 3 replacement cartridges each. Thank you, Innokin.

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 18.jpg


Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 19.jpg


► Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit; Final Thoughts:
First of all, I'd like to say that the Power Bank and Vape Pen look nice when combined. The slim and compact design makes them easy to carry. Together, they offer several days of battery life. The 400mAh vape pen can be quickly recharged independently or fully charged at least four times using the 2,000mAh power bank. The hole in the panel allows you to easily view the pen's LED even during use, which I really like. The airflow is calibrated for a smooth MTL draw, and I find the flavor produced to be very good. I was surprised considering the low wattage of these cartridges; my favorite is the 1.2Ω one. The cartridges have a capacity of 2.5ml and use a protective membrane on the filling port. In conclusion, I think the EZ Leva Kit is an excellent choice for those looking for an effective tool to kick the habit of smoking.

Thank you to Innokin for sending me the EZ Leva Pod System Kit for review.

• Thank you for reading.

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 20.jpg

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit Review By Frenkyou

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 1.JPG


Hi, today we're taking a look at the EZ Leva Pod System Kit sent to me by Innokin. In this review, I'll examine each of the features that distinguish this item. I hope that by the end of this review, you've understood this product and can decide whether or not to invest in it. As always, my opinions are free and based on my personal experience. Enjoy the read.

► Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit; Before we begin, let's take a look at some of the special features listed by the manufacturer:

• Lightweight and compact
• Easy operation for beginners
• 2400mAh PCC + 400mAh device
• Magnetic wireless charging
• Visual battery indicator

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 2.JPG


► Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit; Packaging:
The EZ Leva's case-shaped packaging is white with a picture of the kit in the center. It features the Innokin and EZ Leva logos, a badge indicating its ease of use for beginners, and a color code indicating the device inside. On the back of the box, you can find the packing list, warnings, and Innokin's address.

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 3.jpg


Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 4.jpg


► Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit; Packing List:
• 1x EZ LEVA Device (400mAh)
• 1x EZ LEVA Pod (2.5ml/1.2Ω)
• 1x EZ LEVA Pod (2.5ml/1.6Ω)
• 1x EZ LEVA Power Bank (2000mAh)
• 1x Dual USB-C Charging Cable
• 1x User Manual

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 5.jpg


► Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit; Specifications:
• Dimensions: 83.4 x 21.1 x 12.1mm
• Battery: 2000mAh (PB) + 400mAh (device)
• Device Charging: Magnetic wireless charging (with power bank), Type-C charging (with cable)
• Capacity: 2.5ml
• Filling: Side
• Maximum output: 14.5W

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 6.jpg


► Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit; Available Colors:
• Sky Blue
• Midnight Black
• Teal Blue
• Champagne Gold
• Silver
• Blush Pink

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 7.JPG


► Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit; How it's made:
Innokin sent me the silver version of the EZ Leva Kit for this review. Below, we can see the leather coating on the handle and side panels of the power bank; on one side, we can see the "Innokin" branding. The leather coating is pleasant to the touch and offers a premium grip.

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 8.jpg


The front panel, where the vape pen is located, is metal and extends laterally onto the panels. On one side, there is a hole that allows you to view the Vape Pen's charge indicator. During use, the PB powers the Vape Pen, and while charging, the LED flashes and turns off when fully charged. The Vape Pen's LED remains white until the charge is above 10%, after which it turns red. You can charge the Vape Pen independently or recharge the PB, which in turn powers the Vape Pen. Additionally, the device vibrates when the cartridge is inserted into the pen and also when the pen is removed from or inserted into the PB.

Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 9.jpg


Innokin EZ Leva Pod System Kit with PCC 2400mAh 10.JPG

Filter