I dont know where you are getting your info from but metals most certainly have molecules lol.
Oh, please. Do tell. I'm all ears.
I dont know where you are getting your info from but metals most certainly have molecules lol.
I dont know where you are getting your info from but metals most certainly have molecules lol.
Its a big surprise....
That would be nice....but I doubt that it's going to happen. What's the phrase? Trade Secret?
Dr. F mentions metals being detected in vapor. He doesn't mention when, what study, detected that or what metals were detected. Those little tidbits would provide some additional guidance in the mean time until a real, comprehensive, study is performed and published.
The other thing that strikes me is that he is recommending caution with coils based on those metals being detected. Given that he is a bonafide research physician, scientist, using traceable test equipment, something in that result of detected metals must be making him feel it is worth mentioning to the vaping community because it MAY present a real problem.
Again, until and unless a real study is performed, reviewed and published, we're all just shooting blanks in the dark.
Never mind.I’ve been thinking.
I wonder how hard it would be to find an oppressed minority group that feels like their right to exercise their passion might be in jeopardy. I could profess to be an advocate for their rights and offer to support them in a public forum, based on my "professional qualifications". Of course, in order to do so, I would need specific, identifiable, hot-button "issues" of concern regarding their passion to debunk. If I took the liberty of fabricating imaginary “issues”, and making alarmist proclamations, I might be able to raise these fabricated concerns to a level of serious worry amongst this community. Then I could offer to conduct studies of these "issues", and come up with findings that show them to be of no importance. Heck, I could even use crowd funding methods to solicit my research funding. Very little effort invested for a nice little research budget boost. It shouldn’t be too hard to come up with a continuing string of “concerns”. This could be a nice little income stream.
What am I thinking? This would be immoral. And there’s no way people would continue to fall for it (besides, I don’t have the necessary qualifications). Forget I even mentioned it.
I shouldn’t try to think and drink (and vape) at the same time.
We now return you to our regularly scheduled programming.
Forget I even mentioned it.
I shouldn’t try to think and drink (and vape) at the same time.
As for Dr. F. giving "opinions", I'll take an opinion from a vape friendly medical researcher any day over 1) antz or 2) anyone in the general vaping population who does not have a formal background in medical / physiological / combustion science areas....
Sure he could be less than perfectly right about some things, but when he says "use caution" those are the very things I will tend to be cautious about.....because I don't think Dr. F. makes pronouncements in order to hear himself talk LOL
I subscribe to the "less is more" when considering putting stuff into my lungs, ....
Other studies have found chromium, nickel, zinc, lead and probably others. Since Kanthal is made of Chromium, Iron, and Aluminum, then it follows that the metal in the vapor much be "leeching" from the coil wire itself. (Nichrome, as its name implies is Nickel, Chromium, Iron. Some cigalikes probably use Nichrome which would explain the nickel being found).
That's the problem. We don't know for sure. I've seen many speculations about possible dangers of chromium in kanthal...
We can't really compare Ni in gums (or food) to Ni in vapor--which we inhale directly into our lungs.
Imeo is using titanium wire (Ti) in his new device. Is that any better? I wish Dr. Farsalinos did a study comparing all kinds of wires used in our coils. I've seen a study where Cr and Ni levels were elevated in vapor, but they were still lower than Cr and Ni levels in ambient air. So, if you vape in Los Angeles, your e-cig vapor is cleaner than the air you breathe....
The Dangers of E-Cigarettes: Toxic Metals Exposed | E-Cigarette Forum
As for Dr. F. giving "opinions", I'll take an opinion from a vape friendly medical researcher any day over 1) antz or 2) anyone in the general vaping population who does not have a formal background in medical / physiological / combustion science areas....
Obviously some vapers who are used to dry-burning their liquids for a long time did not like my statement.
so far, Dr. F, whom I respect and admire, hasn't offered any scientific explanation for his recommendations. On the contrary, he himself says that tests are needed because we really won't know until we test.
this is exactly how I feel about it. His warning sentences began with "suggest" and "advise" -
<snip>
Dr. F. frequently talks about "minimizing the risks", I tend to take this recommendation for what it is: a potentially risk-minimizing recommendation from a very risk-conscious person, which is more than fine with me (given the fact that I don't have to stop vaping if I follow his advice).
I'll take any opinion that is sound and backed by good science. I don't care where it comes from.
I hear you Katya. Its just that I do "consider the source".
Last time Dr. F. had "concerns" about something, let's just go ahead and call it a hunch.....it ended up with testing eliquids for diacetyls. And to the surprise of many, over 70% contained it.
I agree, with a small modification for my own use :
I'll take any facts (i.e., something stated as a fact) backed by good science.
An opinion is just that, an opinion.
Right, except he never indicated to us that he was just offering his "opinion." Rather, he quite emphatically stated:
"Do not overheat the coils. It's one of the worst things that you're doing is to burn the coil until it's getting red. ... It's the most disastrous things you are doing. Because when you are heating the metal to the point that it's getting, where it's glowing red you are basically destroying the bonds between the metal molecules and then you are greatly facilitating the emission of metals from the coil into the vapor. ... Period. Just by doing it once you are destroying the metal structure. You shouldn't do it. ... It's the worst thing that you are doing. You're completely destroying the metal structure."
Does this sound like an opinion to you?
"WE" did not exaggerate. I've deleted further comments for propriety.Of course not, Katya, if we take this part of his communication. But I began reading at the first sentence
He misstated facts based on a completely erroneous interpretation
If you take only this part: yes, too much, especially considering his authority and the expectations he is confronted with.
But let's also consider that this was not even a publication - only a verbal recommendation. This is why, all in all, taken the whole context, maybe he exaggerated as to how to word a recommendation correctly, yes. And then, we exaggerated back
I'm not sure which study you're referring to, but I do remember our discussion not long ago. Follow the link if you want to see the thread. We've been at it for quite sometime...