I was under the impression that nudenicotine is a highly regarded supplier. Though, I bought my nic from Vapers Tek.
Highly regarded supplier, for sure, but their "science" writing is, as was pointed out, quite convoluted and in my opinion reveals much to be desired in terms of understanding basic chemistry. And I doubt that the tiny amount of ascorbic acid added in their Armor line will do much to prevent long-term oxidation from air exposure. There is just not enough present for that, as far as I can tell. But people value details and peace of mind with their nic, so psychologically it might be beneficial. Chemically I don't see the point at all, and have some concerns.
Here is something I think they fail to understand about nic oxidation. In a closed 50 mL glass bottle of 100 mg/mL nic with 4 mL air headspace there is contained within, nothing to be done about it, enough O2 to react with 8 mg of nic. That's it. So if ALL of it reacts with nic, this will at most mean about 8 mg of nic will oxidize. Not 8 mg/mL, just 8 mg total, out of the 5000 mg of nic present. The cap might allow a bit of O2 over time, but very little, and then in the freezer the reaction rate goes to almost zero. Which means as long as O2 is kept out, a 100.00 mg/mL nic solution will become, at worst, a 99.84 mg/mL solution. This is well within the experimental error (.1 mg/mL precision is not really ever seen), so the 100. mg/mL solution is still 100. mg/mL. And the ascorbic acid added in their Armor line is just enough to prevent not even 8 mg of nic from oxidizing, maybe half of it. And you are inhaling ascorbic acid as well as its diketone oxidation product, neither of which we know about health wise. I think it is a foolish move on their part. They need to find out if inhaling asc acid or its oxidation products are safe. Citing ascorbic acid's use in food/drink preservation has nothing to do with inhalation, and they should know that. It might be fine, but it doesn't look like they explored it scientifically at all.
Another thing is chemical kinetics. Take 50 mL of a 100 mg/mL and a 24 mg/mL nic solution, same carrier liquid, and let them both sit out at room temperature in something more porous to O2, like LDPE. Wait for a given period of time, and measure the amount of nic-oxides in both solutions. The
percent of nicotine oxidized will be about THE SAME for both, but total oxidized amount in the 100 mg/mL solution will be more than in the 24 mg/mL solution. This is because the rate is "first-order" in nic concentration, meaning that the half-life of the nicotine is a constant, that is, the time for half the nic to oxidize is the same for both solutions. 100 mg/mL will turn into 50 mg/mL in the SAME amount of time that 24 mg/mL will turn into 12 mg/mL. They might be aware of this chemistry, but comparing two different temperature conditions adds more complexity (very different reaction rates), and the underlying chemistry is lost on the reader. And everything slows down to a virtual standstill in the freezer.
Purging the headspace with N2 or Ar will keep all of about 7 mg of nic from oxidizing. That is it. Negligible, and adds expense. Again, this is not 7 mg/mL, this is 7 mg of nic total from a 4 mL headspace of air.
Diluting before freezing is ok, but there may be considerable space issues. PG-nic can oxidize faster, since it is more liquid in the freezer, but if it is in glass, this is largely moot if O2 can't get in. I do see faster oxidation of PG-nic in LDPE than VG-nic, however. But people are routinely getting years out of their PG-nic if it is in glass and in the freezer. I don't have much freezer/glass data for PG-nic, since I don't use it. But most PG-nic I have taken from the freezer after many months did not change. Some less-pure from 2009 did change.
Shaking a sealed bottle with a few mL of headspace to mix it is really NO different than just letting it sit, in terms of oxidation potential. You don't introduce more O2 by shaking, but it will take less time to react with all O2 inside. Stirring with a deep vortex (magnetic/mechanical stirring) in open air will introduce a lot more O2. Shaking in a sealed bottle, no.
UV (not visible light) catalyzes nic oxidation, but without O2 present, UV will not do anything, at least not UV from the sun. And glass blocks most UV anyway...well it turns it into heat energy which can raise the temperature (think closed car in summer), which will speed up oxidation, but again, no O2 means no oxidation.
If you want a long-term supply of nic, by high-nic, put it in glass and freeze it, leave a bit of headspace for possible expansion. It's what I have always done, with virtually perfect results after almost 7 years. No N2, Ar or ascorbic acid. Glass + freezer + headspace. Done. People are freaking out over minute quantities of O2, which at worst will lead to negligible oxidation, and paying top dollar for liquid treatments that cannot even mitigate more than a very minor amount of oxidation. But as I said, some feel calmer about their long-term prospects with overkill methods, and this "peace of mind" might be financially worth it to them. NudeNic won't mind that mentality, I'm sure.
