If Rosa Parks had continued to sit at the back of the bus because it was the law at the time and it made people "uncomfortable" to sit beside people like Rosa, Rosa's grandchildren would still be sitting at the back of the bus.
If Rosa Parks had continued to sit at the back of the bus because it was the law at the time and it made people "uncomfortable" to sit beside people like Rosa, Rosa's grandchildren would still be sitting at the back of the bus.
Wow, you are kind of angry and nasty, aren't you? Seriously, if you studied the anti-smoker and now anti-vapor movement, you would understand that the principles behind it are a much more serious affront to our freedom to live our lives however the hell we want to live our lives than most people can fathom. So, you make jokes and try to be clever. Why? Recently, a South African chef was denied the right to continue to live in New Zealand where he had lived and worked for 6 years because he was too FAT. Last year and all of the years previously, he had no problems, but suddenly, now he is too FAT and presents a health risk. For that, he is being tossed out of the country. Smokers are denied jobs, housing, the right to foster children, etc. etc. simply for being smokers. If you cannot see that the future can also present those same basic rights to vapers, to overweight people, to drinkers, to those who do not exercise according to a prescribed plan, then you are either unable to see the big picture or just like to try being clever.And with that, I think this thread is complete. Vaping rights have already been likened to the Jewish holocaust on here, it was only time until we started equating the state of a vaper with an oppressed black person pre Civil Rights legislation. I for one am sick of waking up in my own house to the sight of a burned, blackened e-cig effigy in my front yard. My uncle was lynched the other night because he was vaping outside. Can we go ahead and appropriate I Have A Dream for our cause, brothers and sisters?
Please tell that to my government because they came to they came to a different conclusion when they banned smoking in all private businesses and offices. The owners don't get to make that decision. Now they are trying to do the same thing with vaping.
Was that the right to vape period? Or the right to vape anywhere we damn well please?Vaping rights have already been likened to the Jewish holocaust on here...
Have they shown scientifically that lead paint or asbestos can cause harm?You mean the same way they banned lead paint from being used, or asbestos?
Have they shown scientifically that lead paint or asbestos can cause harm?
Have they shown scientifically that lead paint or asbestos can cause harm?
SFbrianT-My take on it is if you were to have a car running in your living room you would croak within hours. If you smoke in your living room you'll die decades later. The ban of outside smoking makes less sense as banning car exhaust.
You mean the same way they banned lead paint from being used, or asbestos?
Seriously, if you studied the anti-smoker and now anti-vapor movement, you would understand that the principles behind it are a much more serious affront to our freedom to live our lives however the hell we want to live our lives than most people can fathom. So, you make jokes and try to be clever.
Should open up a vaping lounge with a REAL coffee shop in it. That's the ticket.
That is the best idea ever...I think I'm gonna get to work on that.
And I'm only halfway joking about it. I want to open a business and if I could make it successful, I think you just gave me a winner. Don't worry, if it works I'll put your name on the sign somewhere...somewhere in the fine print.![]()