Simple, it's a matter of degree. But if you claim it's the same, I disagree. Americans, as people, are taught JudeoChristian ethics from infancy, and have internalized the concepts of the American Constitution and Bill of Rights much more than the British or Europeans. America has fallen a lot in the last decade, become more "pragmatic", children have not been raised as "close", and corporate workers are pressured to serve their employer, but still, it's far far different from people who were taught to pretend to serve the fatherland and the party above all, that all traditional values are laughable lies, that older people who talk about traditions or religion are dangerous reactionaries, and then (rather suddenly) that making money and getting ahead are after all very important. Imagine how different, after all, that is from what you were taught! No, it's not xenophobic to recognize social/historical effects. It has a huge impact on what is at least reasonably believable, like can you at least in part believe what it says on labels.
So Banjo, it's a "rant" if it's against Chinese business practices, but if it's against American ones you don't react?
So Banjo, it's a "rant" if it's against Chinese business practices, but if it's against American ones you don't react?
Last edited: